That’s correct.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:23:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868391347520180378
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868387853555683414
Form: Reply
-
Correcct
Correcct.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:22:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868391316637495762
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868388365391012170
-
Correct. And very well said
Correct. And very well said.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:06:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868387085272719470
Reply addressees: @ArcologyTech
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868385636685943199
-
I simply want what is in the interests of the most evolve population because I a
I simply want what is in the interests of the most evolve population because I am in the most evolved population (despite its current crisis). That is a preference. My preference varies little from the institutions I live under. It varies little from the laws of nature. That’s my preference. There is just limited divergence between my preference and the laws of nature because I have the privilege of living under a legal system that most converges on the laws of nature.
That is a want.
The laws of nature are not a want. They are a description., I don’t confuse the two.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:05:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868387002573619200
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868384793668513916
-
Not sure why you don’t grasp that like libertarians you’re presuming you have th
Not sure why you don’t grasp that like libertarians you’re presuming you have the choice of moral utility or preference independent of externalities that determine its limits. Immorality exists as universally demonstrated behavior, and therefore morality exists as a universal description of human behavior. Like all scientific propositions you may choose to pay the costs and obtain the benefits of bending or violating those laws in order to achieve a utilitarian end. But you will pay those costs. The trade off is just a matter of choice. That does not mean morality is relative between polities any more than it means morality is relative between individuals in a polity. It means morality, moral utility, and moral preference describe a spectrum of from science to applies science.
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 20:03:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868386334848774144
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868383363989479509
-
I don’t make people feel good. My job is scientific and judicial. It’s up to pop
I don’t make people feel good. My job is scientific and judicial. It’s up to populists to make you feel good.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 19:54:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868384168138473976
Reply addressees: @Cryptogal3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868383526653149391
-
I have not expressed my preferences as universalism I’ve expressed evolutionary
I have not expressed my preferences as universalism I’ve expressed evolutionary computation as the standard of comparison against which all decisions can be made by establishing and fully accounting between the lower limit (evocomp) the operation (cooperation) and the consequence (rate of evolutionary computation). It’s just mathmatics of the rate of the development of the conversion of energy per capita. There is no ‘opinion or preference’ there.
My ‘advice’ is that the process of evolutionary computation, operations, and rate provide the maximum utility possible for a population in and across time, at the cost of market suppression of reproduction of the unfit.
Again, that’s just math of the rate of development of the conversion of energy per capita into adaptation and evolution.
It’s just math. sorry.
You choose what to do with the math.
I just tell you what the math is.Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 19:53:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868383840332656640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868382412696392067
-
If you wish to abandon decidability in matters of conflict and instead embrace r
If you wish to abandon decidability in matters of conflict and instead embrace relativism such that morality is not decidable but only utilitarian then that’s a choice you man to redefine a term to suit your bias – as does the left. you avoid first principles of decidability to…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 19:47:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868382335202378028
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868381517157703943
-
So again, you’re talking about science vs applied science. I realize you’re talk
So again, you’re talking about science vs applied science. I realize you’re talking about application instead of the science itself.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 19:42:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868381160012984434
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868380823344300408
-
The staff hates that I waste my time on it. And it’s not always helpful to stomp
The staff hates that I waste my time on it. And it’s not always helpful to stomp on the intellectual bunnies. But yes it’s often humorous and educational.
THey just don’t want me to do it. They don’t even want me to respond to trolls and nitwits. The problem is I do learn…
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 18:59:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868370312162873519
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868314159924093207