Exactly. Very smart. π
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-29 00:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884400853618167860
Reply addressees: @Father_Speaking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884389186167529731
Exactly. Very smart. π
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-29 00:39:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884400853618167860
Reply addressees: @Father_Speaking
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884389186167529731
(Belief in God)
Q: –“@curtdoolittle are you an atheist or do you believe in the God of whatever faith you are a part of?”–
I am able to separate my job which is judicial and is extremely uncommon, from my psychological needs which are the same as every other human. I do not find difficulty with this dualism. Most do.
I was raised with familial puritanical church of england ethics in the catholic church and graduated from a private catholic high school taught by Xaverian brothers. I am, like most europeans a synthesis of european and christian traditions. And I see those traditions as european aristocratic vs semitic slave-peasant as do most philosophers. We define our gods as we need to.
As such I am both Pagan: Natural and Ancestor ‘worship’ and christian: extension of kinship love to all.
Personally, I talk to god every day. The difference is I don’t claim I have knowledge of that god’s mode of existence, and I don’t find that god is analogous to any in the abrahamic or other religions (even if closest to Tyr or Zeus). And I don’t submit to that god because in the european aristocratic tradition it is our job to ascend into demigods and gods ourselves. So, my version of god is more of ‘the universe is god and the laws of the universe are his laws and how I discourse with that god is unknown and irrelevant to me.
The result is that the Natural Law is in fact, the will of god or gods or nature, if will it possesses. Otherwise it is just the law of the universe. And I explain that law more so than all in history combined. Because I stand on the shoulders of those great men of history beginning with Aristotle and Democritus. π
See Oath of Transcendent man:
https://t.co/hMytVaRgha
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @PlayerJuan11
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 18:53:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884313852416004096
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884306307232289092
(Doolittle on AI)
Q: Curt: –“How does AI intersect with Metaphor Theory? AI seems very logic based while Metaphor Theory seems to postulate that we humans think in layers and layers of metaphors built up based on our physical experience in the world.”– @patriciamdavis
Metaphor is a category of analogy and analogy is a category of generalization – neurons compete to achieve a coherence of competing networks of generalizations.
AutoAssociation of episodic memory in the hippocampal region seeks analogy for the purpose of identification > prediction > competition > valence > attention (choice).
LLM AI is not logic based (sets), but bayesian probabilism (statistics). Instead, we are having a hell of a problem making it Reason because reason (wayfinding) requires parallel competition and preservation of state. So, Math and Programming ( set logic, procedural logic, finite references and referents) are much much easier than reasoning (episodic logic, infinite referents). And my (our) work requires mathematical decidability, programmatic reasoning, and auto-associative narrating (episodic traversal).
Cheers
CURT
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 18:38:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884310136313069569
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884306479798440187
Yeah. I kinda know these things. But at least you don’t want to be sure of the wrong things. lol -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 18:18:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884305069744722174
Reply addressees: @Johnny2Fingersz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884304780413272285
I don’t even know any worth mentioning, and I’m from the Popper-Kuhn Critical Rationalist faction – which is pretty solid by comparison to the rest. :(. Personally I think philosophy is dead for other than improving argumentation. But then I’m sure to be categorized as aβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 18:02:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884300957057704234
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884295534665748761
PS: I love discourse and some debate, as long as (a) we’re both seeking to understand (b) it’s intellectually honest (c) and not a waste of my time. None of those three requirements is common in social media, and all three in a context is … let’s just say too infrequent. Conversely with fellow academics the desire to seek to understand, especially anything that generates conflict, is taboo, or tangential is met with intellectual dishonesty, avoiding seeking to understand, and all too often a waste of my time – even when I use my most deferential tone.
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 17:52:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884298420434952192
I mean… I could spend the next 45 minutes laying out the argument in detail, or I could take advantage of our friendly acquaintance to use humor to insert a delay until I have that amount of time available.
I’ve already drafted the answer to one hard question this morning and I’ve only been up for two hours.
And I have to get a beard trim before a meeting in 90 minutes. So we’ll have to pick up this tet-a-tet later on.
lol -Cheers
PS: I love debates, as long as (a) we’re both seeking to understand (b) it’s intellectually honest (c) and not a waste of my time. None of those three requirements is common, and all three in context is … let’s just say too infrequent. Conversely with fellow academics the desire to seek to understand, especially anything that’s taboo, or tangential is met with intellectual dishonesty, avoiding seeking to understand, and all too often a waste of my time – even when I use my most deferential tone.
Reply addressees: @Johnny2Fingersz
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 17:50:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884297985401790464
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884295298027319648
Reckless. Hmm… That’s bedroom fun with the ladies. π Has no place in epistemology. π
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 17:37:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884294799739740367
Reply addressees: @Johnny2Fingersz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884239868328567211
RT @Empty_America: From what I gather, the native “higher fertility group” in France is made up mostly of affluent or even aristocratic, trβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 15:51:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884267963089576407
RT @ThruTheHayes: THAT’S UNREASONABLEY KIND
To think the CIA is simply 5 years behind collecting data about scenarios they have an intimatβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2025-01-28 15:49:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1884267643873681858