RT @elonmusk: Yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914866186598436900
RT @elonmusk: Yes
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914866186598436900
I dunno about that. In my case it’s more about the behavior that generated the circumstance on one hand (presumptions) and the theories that follow (presumptions) that fascinate me. “How do people think about these things?” That’s what I find interesting.
Personally? The stuff that ‘bothers’ me is … the purely evil. Like that psycho Bryan Kohberger who killed a group of young people in the northwest a year or two ago. It’s just randomness out of nowhere. Without reason. The time and energy to spin up that much fked-up in one head is just … that’s just not good. Human time bombs walking around with enough IQ points to hide it. Not good.
On the other hand …I love horror movies. π lol
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:09:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914864084870422529
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914853152093819210
—“Curt: Do you have an interest in any real-life mystery stories?”—
I do when I want to fall asleep at night. π Which is the only time I spend on such things. But, yes, I’m interested in edge-cases in general (in fact that’s what I study, right?) So as edge cases they’re fascinating.
My wife once said “everything interesting happens at the edges” and I thought it was one of the best little quotable insights. We look for knowledge in regularities but it’s insights we find at the edges – where conflict happens. π
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:24:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914852803228602368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851053821895161
I mean, by now we all know Hoe_Math is brilliant, and a great communicator, and a strong comedian. But you know, this one’s next level. lol https://twitter.com/ItIsHoeMath/status/1914802170320617942
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:20:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851874458755139
OK HM. That was next level. ;). -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 01:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914851649149133258
Reply addressees: @ItIsHoeMath
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914802170320617942
–“What do you mean by universal ethno nationalism?”–
It means that given the distribution of differences between groups that we should maximize the capacity of ethnicities to self govern in those cases where the marginal difference in those ethnicities generates demand for different personal, social, economic, and political traditions, norms, and institutions – and in particular economic and legal institutions to the degree that the degree of autonomy and informality under natural law varies by the degree of agency in the population and the resulting demand for formality.
Given that people vary in ability and agency for production, cooperation, and trust, people need institutions both informal and formal sufficiently persistent in all contexts to provide external regulation for continuous preservation and improvement of individuals and the group such that it imposes no harms on other groups by its failure to do so.
This is about all there is to understand to ‘peace prosperity and evolutionary development’. The problem of course is that knowledge, methods, processes, technologies, and the surpluses that provide the capacity to disrupt networks of parasitism and predation remaining from the age of agrarianism and early industrialization are equally unevenly distributed and that we are going through the same category of transformation as we did from hunter gather to agrarian, and agrarian to industrial and now to technological.
in some ways, as others before have oft stated, the industrial revolution was either delayed by the fall of rome and the abrahamic cancers of judaism, christianity, and islam, (and now, again, by the marxist sequence), or early, if we account for their vicissitudes, and that the technological revolution we are now experiencing could equally have happened centuries earlier, and so when we were less entrenched in falsehoods and thus struggling due to the falsehoods (again abrahamisms) and recalcitrant corruptions (bureaucratic religion of the ccp, common corruption of the russian oligarchy, archaic corruption of iranic muslim demand for another caliphate of ignorance.)
Evolution isn’t merciful. We either create it by cooperation or we are destroyed by it for failing to cooperate. And to cooperate by the law of evolution: the natural law of evolutionary computation by the natural law of cooperation by the natural law of sovereignty by the duty of insurance of reciprocity in our demonstrated interests.
It’s just calculation. It’s physics. We don’t get a choice.
Reply addressees: @RichardArion1
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 00:22:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914837156780232704
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914831346264105279
If and only if the general strategy doesn’t work, and compared to what? Not acting now before the chinese act.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 23:37:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914825982181319007
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1911495729186848980
RE: LLMs using helix and trig for arithmetic.
–“This is incredible but itβs interesting because it also strikes me as an overly complicated way to represent things.”– @vartanshad
Nodding to hammers and nails: If everything you have for representation uses vectors it shouldn’t be surprising that everything looks like a vector. π We have this same problem with humans using mathematics in physics and economics: the grammar of mathematics breaks down at the point of demand for the causality of discrete operations. Personally I find it’s solution fascinating. π
Reply addressees: @vartanshad @LiorOnAI
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 20:11:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914774126709104642
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914515578154369071
WTH? I do hard science. Sorry.
Those are the reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 19:06:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914757604322238477
Reply addressees: @Johnny2Fingersz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914756724973846650
(You’re not a “noisy” provocative activist but a discrete collaborative one. And this is social media… π Takes both kinds. But noise gets more attention. )
Source date (UTC): 2025-04-22 14:43:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914691464711561551
Reply addressees: @bierlingm @Logos_Elect @NutriDetect @NathanWiens9 @Will_of_Europa @MicroBerto @ChrisDeVocht_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914661095022776689