Form: Quote Commentary

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51733963_10156986188277264_7313914329642827776_o_10156986188272264.jpg (author redacted upon request)Noah J RevoyMetaphysics, obfuscating obvious concepts for 3,500 years.Feb 14, 2019, 8:33 AMCurt Doolittlequoted sharedFeb 14, 2019, 8:41 AMRichard HallWell f*ck. Big chunks of Evolas works are largely obfuscation.Feb 14, 2019, 8:44 AMCurt Doolittlesurprise. ;)Feb 14, 2019, 8:47 AMCurt DoolittleIt’s entertaining. it’s inspiring. But it’s obfuscation.Feb 14, 2019, 8:47 AMRainhard PitschkeMetaphysical Philosophy: A game played by Mediterranean fishermen when hunkered down during bad weather, consisting of tying knots in word strings to make nets.Feb 14, 2019, 9:03 AMJim YankowskyRichard Hall honest question; whats the point of writing these tomes for the folks in question? Just to dazzle people with verbal pyrotechnics and appear smarter than the average bear?Feb 14, 2019, 9:05 AMRainhard PitschkeLawyers: Modern fishermen who employ nets made by the above, but with hooks attached. The hooks are baited with revenge and greed offers.Feb 14, 2019, 9:14 AMCurt DoolittleEvola continued the european tradition of continental philosophy and literature, which remains, fundamentally, theological (even today), and quite unlike anglo (legal-scientific). It is meant to inspire more than educate – as if in church. Anglo literature is meant to educate more than inspire – as if in court.Feb 14, 2019, 9:15 AMChris FowlerThis is a great conversation to illustrate the fundamental placement of grammar in critical thinking Curt,great post.Feb 14, 2019, 9:16 AMRainhard PitschkePriests: Fishermen who convince fish that the net is the ocean, so……”c’mon out!”.Feb 14, 2019, 9:20 AMPhilip Clarkcurt honest question:

What are the faults/weaknesses to propertianism?

I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.Feb 14, 2019, 9:21 AMCurt DoolittleUm. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few. They are all reducible to:

1. its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. People want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism.

2. people want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.

3. jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.

4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.

5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.

6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )

As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever.

THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS are listed in Section 3 Here:

https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264Feb 14, 2019, 9:50 AMCurt DoolittleYeah but dammit, how do we explain this shit to people without all this damned painful argument?????Feb 14, 2019, 9:51 AMPhilip ClarkCurt Doolittle thanks for responding and in a quick and polite way

Along with sourcing.

I do hope that one day we can actually get propertianism to be enable for all of the of the US or maybe just a part of it that we can call ours.

Thanks againFeb 14, 2019, 9:55 AMChris FowlerCurt http://dontfallacy.me/Feb 14, 2019, 10:27 AMRichard HallJim Yankowsky Seems so. Plus you can get an adulating following that way.Feb 14, 2019, 10:32 AMCurt Doolittle(BTW: that links to a virus installer)Feb 14, 2019, 10:50 AMCurt Doolittleit is not a matter of hope. it is a matter of choice, and violence.Feb 14, 2019, 10:56 AMRustle MoreFeb 14, 2019, 12:13 PMGabriel Schmeiske LaportThis and while we’re on this.

Wasn’t that one of Hiedegger’s points all along, too? Every philosopher after Plato and Aristotle, according to him, had gone in the wromg direction. Into the realm of proof, not truth or as Curt Doolittle said before, into the realm of mathematical operations, which is tautological by virtue.

They called him a Nazi and proceeded to misinterpret and obfuscate his thoughts into the post-modern milieu.

Am I off base here, or what?Feb 14, 2019, 12:39 PMCurt DoolittleGabriel Schmeiske Laport No. Heidegger and Hegel are not wrong in many of their assertions and observations (particularly hegel) they are just trying to solve the wrong problem by retaining german phenomenalism and retaining conflation of experience and existence. Heidegger tries to complete this project by reversing existence and experience. And thus heidegger brought the phenomenalist project to a dead end, just as frege kripke at all brought the anglo analytic project to a dead end. The problem is NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THEY WERE DEAD FUCKING ENDS… lol.

However I am still stuck with the fact that while anglo is superior for the aristocracy and middle class, it cerainly appears that the germans are optimum for pedagogy and the working classes. And it increasingly appears that the christians (italians basically) are optimum for the underclasses. And I cannot (god damn fcuk!!) find a way around this problem other than the traditional ‘teach them what you can and take them to their limits, with the law constraining each’.Feb 14, 2019, 1:04 PMJim CatreThe difference between “I think, therefore I am”, to the subsequent “what am I?”Feb 14, 2019, 1:47 PMBill Joslin(The sorting-label an Arab librarian scrolled across lecture notes of some old writer)Feb 14, 2019, 2:11 PM(author redacted upon request)