Form: Quote Commentary

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_319932843

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_3199328431644868608_o_10157055895227264.jpg OPEN SEASON.Corey HarmsHANG EM UP AND BLEED EM OUT!Mar 18, 2019, 1:17 AMHoward Van Der KlauwBlocked yet?Mar 18, 2019, 1:18 AMCurt DoolittleJohn MarkMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMSolomon VolodymyrWant to see it happenMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMPhilip SaundersStephan Kinsella keeps stating things are “not libertarian” as if this is an argument.Mar 18, 2019, 1:29 AMJames PortocarreroMar 18, 2019, 1:31 AMPhilip SaundersYikes.Mar 18, 2019, 1:33 AMCurt Doolittle(((ethics)))Mar 18, 2019, 1:34 AMPhilip SaundersLow trust afMar 18, 2019, 1:36 AMVince Reefuck that guys a piece of shitMar 18, 2019, 1:40 AMConnor SumnersLol I love this. I may have to make a portrait in this theme of Curt now.Mar 18, 2019, 1:41 AMJosef KalininI’ve always found Libertarian individualism to be a grotesque rebranding of hedonistic egoism and an immensely hateable rationalistic reductionism. It’s easy to ignore the problems of society when you define the individual and his direct self-interest as the highest category of importance and explain literally the entirety of human dynamics according to the egoistic paradigm. They don’t care about issues like racial suicide and demographic replacement because the entire concept of an ethnic identity is too collectivist for them and they would happily see the world blend together into mystery meat under some utopian view of a world of individuals without nations, cultures, or otherwise “collectivist” blankets defining them.

    TLDR, libertarians are sellouts, and deserve 9mm hollow point inside the backs of their skulls.Mar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMSaber LambertHes a fucking lawyer what did you expect hahaMar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMFelix RyanGarbage rothbardian ethics.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMJosef KalininThe fucking constitution itself is anti-libertarian because it’s not a private document.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMFelix RyanJosef Kalinin nice.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMCurt DoolittleJosef Kalinin Shit. That made me laugh hard… lolMar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMFelix RyanI can hear the hand rubbing when he tweets that.Mar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMRyan WilliamsTear him to bits and shit on the remains. His ghetto pilpul libertarian freeriding must die.Mar 18, 2019, 1:54 AMM Shawn DavisMuh philosophical purityMar 18, 2019, 1:55 AMAdam DavidI used to call myself a libertarian.

    The special mystery meat blanderup was the fundamental hangup i had which lead me to search out a better way.

    Lets expose them to P law before putting them against the metaphorical wall.Mar 18, 2019, 2:17 AMJohn EdwardThey violated the rights of the people who worked hard to get degrees from those schools without cheating/bribing. You reduce the value of the good (diploma) by issuing counterfeits.Mar 18, 2019, 2:46 AMMichael D HaasWhat an idiotMar 18, 2019, 3:45 AMPaddy LynchCurt’s giant dick busts more hips than old age and car accidents combinedMar 18, 2019, 3:55 AMPhill KnyspelThe sophist takes on Doolittle . Round 1 ding ding hahaMar 18, 2019, 4:17 AMJaromír MiškovskýOk Ideology with with such strong dictionary that it can be translated to call computer porgram. Vs. project where dig accros multiple sources. Hmm….Mar 18, 2019, 4:26 AMSolomon VolodymyrI used to be L before I realised that utopian state of non-coercion can’t exist for most peoples. That’s where P comes in.Mar 18, 2019, 5:16 AMMathuin HillgarthStephanie who???Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMathuin HillgarthGotta love autocorrect to aid in an insultMar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMSolomon VolodymyrIt’s our insurance, guaranteeing liberty by seizing sovereignty; removing parasitism by promising reciprocity.Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMicah PezdirtzAnyone calling P nonsense just demonstrates to me the state of their denial.Mar 18, 2019, 6:10 AMEric BestPhilip Saunders his rhetoric is very “religious.”Mar 18, 2019, 6:59 AMHans JohanssonModern libertarianism has essentially turned into corporate neoliberalism.Mar 18, 2019, 7:13 AMEly HarmanBuying your way into college is a lot less stupid and destructive than affirmative action. At least the money benefits the merit based admissions and compensates them for putting up with fuckwit heirs. And if people make something of THEIR lives, I don’t see the harm in giving their children a shot.Mar 18, 2019, 9:04 AMMoritz BierlingIt would be ok if they openly said that you can buy admissionMar 18, 2019, 9:22 AMCurt DoolittleMoritz Bierling correctMar 18, 2019, 10:38 AMJoseph RossI agree with you Curt. Even if I thought you were wrong I wouldn’t side with Kinsella because he had a blue check mark he doesn’t deserve.Mar 18, 2019, 9:26 PMJoseph RossKinsella is someone who just needs to be laughed at. He literally said it’s not a NAP violation to steal bitcoins because there’s no contract involved since it’s decentralized. According to him, since it isn’t a NAP violation there’s no recourse against someone who steals them.Mar 18, 2019, 9:28 PMJimmy KnowlesHe goes over the wallMar 18, 2019, 9:29 PMMichael PattinsonAll this years with HHH and still winging like a little girl.LolMar 19, 2019, 2:50 AMVince Reeoy vey all this antisemetic dog whistlingMar 19, 2019, 2:55 AMJC TrottStealing a seat at a college is “Libertarian”?

    Doesn’t that offend the NAP?Mar 19, 2019, 6:15 AMPhilip SaundersJC Trott the point is that it’s done under the table, rather than openly (which would be fine). There is a false pretence of a purely meritocratic game.

    Also, it has potential to counterfeit the value of the qualification.Mar 19, 2019, 6:21 AMCréachán Ó NáraighPlease take down his intellectual communism in the most public and conclusive manner. It’s already been done but it needs to be done again for a new audience. Example:

    https://strangerousthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/the-economic-principles-of-intellectual-property-and-the-fallacies-of-intellectual-communism/Mar 20, 2019, 12:05 AMDerek YoungFormer libertarian! John Mark has introduced me to Propertarianism! Amazing stuff!Mar 20, 2019, 9:19 AMRichard HeathenMar 22, 2019, 6:32 PMOPEN SEASON.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:16:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53803575_10157054935572264_172668112

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53803575_10157054935572264_1726681121913044992_o_10157054935567264.jpg HERE IS THE FINAL BRICK IN THE WALL => IT”S ALL VIRTUE SIGNALING

    —“Javier Perez de Quaoar

    [Liberals are] Not motivated by their good intentions, but by their emotional need to continue a just war that was won in 1965 by mutating it into a wrongheaded (and conveniently unwinnable) war on every perceivable or imaginable inequality. It is as if Patton, upon reaching Czechoslovakia, had decided to launch a general war on “tyranny” to satisfy his lust for a good tank battle.”—

    —“It is the liberal order that is fundamentally hierarchical, class-based and difractive (it relies on difference and division to survive). Like Hillary’s recent resurrection of her southern drawl or wealthy/hollywood lib types buy their kids into elite schools, it is a conscious (or even unconscious) methodology for obtaining/keeping power while faking solidarity with hundreds (if not thousands) of seperate groups they actually care nothing for.

    This liberal order is breaking down in that the infighting and emboldening of these various castes is bringing their own power struggles to the surface (ihlan omar and muslims vs jews, blacks vs latinos, lgbtqflavor-o-month libs against straight libs etc) in such a way that reveals the real shell game.

    This also fits an idea out of Albion’s Seed where there is a distinct relationship with liberals (and southerners) to the ‘cavaliers’…those anglo-saxon nobility that came to America in it’s early years. It is the ‘borderer’ that is actually more egalitarian.

    African Americans have never left the plantation. Ever. LBJ was absolutely successful. They have remained a solid Dem voting block ever since his ‘great society’ project.”—Brandy RosenbergBrian MillerMar 17, 2019, 3:21 PMEric BestLet’s be honest though, at this point we’re the ones on the plantation. The underclass sits and consumes the fruits of productive labor who has no real representation any longer.Mar 18, 2019, 9:24 AMHERE IS THE FINAL BRICK IN THE WALL => IT”S ALL VIRTUE SIGNALING

    —“Javier Perez de Quaoar

    [Liberals are] Not motivated by their good intentions, but by their emotional need to continue a just war that was won in 1965 by mutating it into a wrongheaded (and conveniently unwinnable) war on every perceivable or imaginable inequality. It is as if Patton, upon reaching Czechoslovakia, had decided to launch a general war on “tyranny” to satisfy his lust for a good tank battle.”—

    —“It is the liberal order that is fundamentally hierarchical, class-based and difractive (it relies on difference and division to survive). Like Hillary’s recent resurrection of her southern drawl or wealthy/hollywood lib types buy their kids into elite schools, it is a conscious (or even unconscious) methodology for obtaining/keeping power while faking solidarity with hundreds (if not thousands) of seperate groups they actually care nothing for.

    This liberal order is breaking down in that the infighting and emboldening of these various castes is bringing their own power struggles to the surface (ihlan omar and muslims vs jews, blacks vs latinos, lgbtqflavor-o-month libs against straight libs etc) in such a way that reveals the real shell game.

    This also fits an idea out of Albion’s Seed where there is a distinct relationship with liberals (and southerners) to the ‘cavaliers’…those anglo-saxon nobility that came to America in it’s early years. It is the ‘borderer’ that is actually more egalitarian.

    African Americans have never left the plantation. Ever. LBJ was absolutely successful. They have remained a solid Dem voting block ever since his ‘great society’ project.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-17 15:08:00 UTC

  • RT @wjfrisby: @alexisgoldstein Those who don’t want Third Reichs shouldn’t build

    RT @wjfrisby: @alexisgoldstein Those who don’t want Third Reichs shouldn’t build Weimar Republics.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 23:19:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107058853273878529

  • “I now perceive and define philosophy as the rationalization of the universe’s h

    —“I now perceive and define philosophy as the rationalization of the universe’s hostility towards man.”–Deus Ex


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 22:35:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107047657254469632

  • “When you meet someone for the first time treat them the best way that you can,

    —“When you meet someone for the first time treat them the best way that you can, after that treat them how they treat you”—Jose Martinez


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 19:01:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106993986634313728

  • “I now perceive and define philosophy as the rationalization of the universe’s h

    —“I now perceive and define philosophy as the rationalization of the universe’s hostility towards man.”–Deus Ex


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 18:34:00 UTC

  • “We’re the only people on the planet expected to transcend our own subjectivity.

    —“We’re the only people on the planet expected to transcend our own subjectivity. But we can’t afford to any longer.”—Tim Beckley-Spillane Because

    (Tim Beckley-Spillane pls comment with an explanation so that I can add it to this post.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 15:53:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1106946615330385921

  • “When you meet someone for the first time treat them the best way that you can,

    —“When you meet someone for the first time treat them the best way that you can, after that treat them how they treat you”—Jose Martinez


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 15:01:00 UTC

  • EXAMPLE OF WHY THE 88’S ALWAYS FAIL —“Propertarianism is bullshit. It’s mental

    EXAMPLE OF WHY THE 88’S ALWAYS FAIL

    —“Propertarianism is bullshit. It’s mental gymnastics for above average IQ spergs. @curtdoolittle doesn’t even have a book defining it. It’ll never catch on. Nationalism, Populism, Socialism, these are already popular among Americans and don’t require new gobbledegook ideologies.”— @HonkHonkler88

    We don’t do ideology. We do law. Countries are run by an operating system we call ‘law’. It’s the only way that they CAN be run. You can build all three of those ideologies, but you must do it with law. And to do it and prevent (((enemies))) you must do it with Propertarianism.

    We don’t do ideology. Because we do law we do policy. People will vote for and act in favor of policy. What you mean is stupid people can’t argue law and policy. I agree. They don’t have to. They just have to fight for something that is ACTIONABLE rather than an empty word.

    You have no leaders. Because you are from the bottom. The bottom never leads. So be nice to your betters who work in your interests despite your thankless ignorant overconfident empty words.

    In fact, all you and those like you do, is illustrate to your betters, that maybe you deserve to disappear into the night.

    (BTW: book or not, except for the very formal work on logic and grammars, the content is all online and easily understood by anyone with a high school education and access to wikipedia. We are in an era where wiki has replaced Britannica, and living documents online replaced books.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 11:41:00 UTC

  • “Globalist agenda is disguised as solution to’ colonizer guilt ‘ an equalizer, t

    —“Globalist agenda is disguised as solution to’ colonizer guilt ‘ an equalizer, to pay penance for ancestors atrocities ,guilt by association is the White Mans albatross ,one that’s psychologically reinforced by not fighting the accusers for fear of appearing indeed racist”—Lezlee Dutton


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-16 09:54:00 UTC