Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “Marcuse’s whole repressive tolerance theory. His goal was to remove stuff so pe

    —“Marcuse’s whole repressive tolerance theory. His goal was to remove stuff so people would forget it ever existed at all.”— Michael D Abbott.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 12:57:00 UTC

  • “Because it’s hard to see what isn’t labelled.”— Michael D. Abbott. The correc

    —“Because it’s hard to see what isn’t labelled.”— Michael D. Abbott.

    The correct term is ‘named’.

    –“If you can name a thing, you can destroy at thing”–

    This quote in many forms is one of the oldest ideas in the western tradition. it is where our ‘spells’ come from. its origin is in metallurgy.

    Knowledge directs power.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 12:56:00 UTC

  • LARGE SHIPS TURN SLOWLY by William L. Benge If participants (participation) in a

    LARGE SHIPS TURN SLOWLY

    by William L. Benge

    If participants (participation) in a market cannot punish (selective refusal of exchange [ban]) their bad actors (peers) then neither can they reward (select for favorable exchange) the trusted actors for gain, since the black hat bad actors will forever have incentive to target, attack, undermine and displace the white hat trusted party (worthy, desirable), and therefore can be relied upon to act on those nefarious incentives.

    It is my opinion the above describes the modern western experience of the now.

    The difference between what occurs in a) the faster markets and b) in the West overall is not outcome but only c) time.

    Reciprocity will assume, emerge. Natural law. Markets in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 12:49:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55462914_10157069797497264_466188474

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55462914_10157069797497264_4661884745779511296_n_10157069797492264.jpg PAINFUL TRUTHDawid Wellabut no amount of lies can ultimately overcome truthMar 24, 2019, 12:16 PMCurt DoolittleYou can’t demonstrate that can you since we have clearly lost the war.Mar 24, 2019, 12:16 PMDawid WellaWho said it’s over?Mar 24, 2019, 12:20 PMEdmund BlackadderThe truth IS like a lion though. And they’re all just zebrasMar 24, 2019, 12:29 PMEric BurkettI’ve been trying to tell people this for years.

    ‘The truth will always win!’

    ‘So I keep hearing. It didn’t though, did it?’Mar 24, 2019, 12:33 PMWilliam L. Benge.

    LARGE SHIPS TURN SLOWLY

    If participants (participation) in a market cannot punish (selective refusal of exchange [ban]) their bad actors (peers) then neither can they reward (select for favorable exchange) the trusted actors for gain, since the black hat bad actors will forever have incentive to target, attack, undermine and displace the white hat trusted party (worthy, desirable), and therefore can be relied upon to act on those nefarious incentives.

    It is my opinion the above describes the modern western experience of the now.

    The difference between what occurs in a) the faster markets and b) in the West overall is not outcome but only c) time.

    Reciprocity will assume, emerge. Natural law. Markets in everything.Mar 24, 2019, 12:44 PMDawid WellaEventually it will out, the problem is how long it takes and at what price.Mar 24, 2019, 12:47 PMNathan VeldstraYet, in western countries people have been ideologically subverted to believe all kinds of lies and those lies are now passed on to the next generations.Mar 24, 2019, 12:49 PMWidukind FünfzehnA lot of history has been written in the blood of the vanquished with no rebuttal. History hates propaganda however. I hope this trend of truth-telling continues.Mar 24, 2019, 12:51 PMDavid StephenTruth always bubbles to the surface. The issue is sometimes the time it takes can make the truth no long relevant.Mar 24, 2019, 12:55 PMIgor WallaertVirgin St. Augustine vs Chad Doolittle.Mar 24, 2019, 12:58 PMAhmed RedaTruthful people should be lions, or something far better: Wolf Packs.Mar 24, 2019, 12:58 PMAlex RobinsonTruth doesnt defend itself, the evidence supporting the truth does so long as its compared to the evidence of a lie that goes against the truth.Mar 24, 2019, 1:01 PMSean Hernandezlost many battles but not he war. otherwise we wouldn’t be here to fight backMar 24, 2019, 1:51 PMJeffery Gog Magog Hughes>assuming that we are capable of unleashing truth on the worldMar 24, 2019, 2:18 PMGabriel Schmeiske LaportCurt Doolittle, stop talking shit and go back to work for truth. 😛

    Love you man.

    Ps. I think the Wotan archetype, at the core of Western tradition is ultimately the archetype of truth being exactly like a lion (which on another aside, is why Lions were often the statues outside places of learning or the aristocrats).

    The return of truth, by the brave, servants of truth, which rise and unleash the revolt of existence and against the monsters of non-existance (lies) is us.Mar 24, 2019, 2:46 PMCurt Doolittleviolence makes right.Mar 24, 2019, 3:16 PMJeffery Gog Magog HughesRight hand rulesMar 24, 2019, 3:29 PMKeith TiedemanA lie can make it around the world before the truth has time to get out of bedMar 24, 2019, 4:53 PMSteve PenderA LOT of old quotes, platitudes will need to be killed or revised. They don’t pass propertarian accounting.Mar 24, 2019, 4:59 PMNick HeywoodHhmmm

    St Augustine is still correct?

    The lion’s caged by lies?

    Curt, you’re describing how to cage the truth and make lies work?Mar 24, 2019, 5:22 PMNick HeywoodHhmmm

    St Augustine is still correct?

    The lion’s caged by lies?

    Curt, you’re describing how to cage the truth and make lies work?Mar 24, 2019, 5:30 PMMicah Pezdirtzwell take a look at lions. they spend 90% of their time.. lying around not doing shitMar 24, 2019, 6:22 PMDan DonleyUntil one day, the lion gets up and tears the shit out of everybody.

    https://youtu.be/e7Cbzrp6I5IMar 24, 2019, 11:40 PMAndrew PenderMight makes right even without need for violence. A mighty wall keeps out transgressors. No one gets shot. Violence is only a weak substitute for powerful might.Mar 25, 2019, 1:26 AMAndrew PenderFun fact about zebras; their stripes keep flies from landing on them.Mar 25, 2019, 1:28 AMEdmund BlackadderThey also mark them as prey animalsMar 25, 2019, 2:09 AMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes Robert HenkeMar 26, 2019, 7:40 AMPAINFUL TRUTH

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 12:11:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54361695_10157069766397264_168269425

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54361695_10157069766397264_1682694257300733952_o_10157069766392264.jpg by Michael AbbottMichael D. AbbottHa ha ha. Unethical pigs in heat. Ha ha.Mar 24, 2019, 12:16 PMMichael D. AbbottChrist. Why are leftists so dumb?Mar 25, 2019, 1:57 AMby Michael Abbott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:56:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54798309_10157069765892264_257868599

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54798309_10157069765892264_2578685990717620224_o_10157069765882264.jpg by Michael AbbottSvan HerulBut then you look at the people that cultivated all that into the left….and they are a majority of a certain race….Mar 26, 2019, 3:56 AMby Michael Abbott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:56:00 UTC

  • THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS PSYCHOLOGY (important) (read this) —“is there any small

    THE SERIES OF GRAMMARS PSYCHOLOGY

    (important) (read this)

    —“is there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).”— Gerard

    I think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and reward systems. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Training: Stoicism (Acquisition of virtues by CBT)

    4 Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    5. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    This series begins with the most precise but least experiential and moves to the least precise but must experiential.

    Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list.

    This series is as important as:

    1. The hierarchy of Measurements (mathematics)

    2. The hierarchy of States of Matter (physical science)

    3. The hierarchy of Grammars (language)

    4. The hierarchy of Knowledge (aristotelian categories)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:54:00 UTC

  • IN CASE YOU MISSED IT … FRAMES OF PEOPLES (important) (read this) Continental

    IN CASE YOU MISSED IT … FRAMES OF PEOPLES

    (important) (read this)

    Continental vs Scandinavian vs Anglo thought, (vs Latin and Orthodox thought for that matter).

    —“It’s just been a challenge suggesting to [Curt] that declarative constructs are not how morality is actually processed.”–Josh Jeppson

    It’s not how it’s processed. I agree. Its however how it is CALCULATED.

    (a) this is forever going to be a debate between occult semitic supernatural, the continental(german) phenomenalistic and the scientific (scandinavian) anglo, and as far as I know tells us nothing other than the amount of time under semitic (church) influence (rule) and the demand for obedience between island (scandinavian/athenian naval security), and territorial (germanic/spartan army vulnerability), or the imperial (Roman Anglo/Germanic-American power confidence)

    (b) So the *demand* for Scientific Rules of Dispute resolution (American), Conformity of Values(Scandinavian), and Conformity of Thought value and deed (German), is determined by the environment for certain. By habituation (tradition) over time out of consequence. By genetics over longer time by rates of reproduction and eugenic suppression.

    (c) And while we EVOLVE a system to satisfy that demand (cheap law of engineering, more expensive law of norms, and very expensive law of thought word and deed), the system of rules one implements need not be limited to the means under which it evolved, any more than reason, measurement (math) and science (testimony) need be limited to those who evolved it.

    (d) My understanding is that one writes law (science) by calculation, one teaches norms (public experience) by imitation of rules, and one indoctrinates into thoughts (education) by parable. ie: Specific Formulae, General Rules, Loose Parables.

    (e) we develop ‘values’ in response to internal trust and external security. These are adaptations. A russian, a Pole, an Italian, a Frenchman, a German, a Dane, an Anglo, an Australian, and an American develop values suited to our condition. However, we assumed these are CHOSEN, and we assume their method of communication must be non-rational. Neither is true.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:36:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55837863_10157069668602264_836174848

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55837863_10157069668602264_8361748481416626176_o_10157069668597264.jpg Quote by Michael Abbott

    CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.Gearóid Walshis there any smaller sphere in which you think psychoanalysis is an appropriate method or inquiry? (ie, hopefully the one it is intended for – personal therapy rather than public argumentation).Mar 24, 2019, 11:29 AMCurt DoolittleI think that it is always better to use this series:

    1. Means: Personality traits and rewards. (anglo/physical)

    2. Cause: Acquisitionism and Propertarianism.(masculine/objective)

    3. Affect(Heroic): Jungian ( Archetypes as proxies for traits) (german, sympathetic)

    4. Defect:(Victim)Freudian Analysis (feminine conformity) (Jewish feminine)

    Personally I would prefer, that we use the above series just like the series math, physics, chemistry, biology, cooperation (sentience/economics), speech (negotiation), that we all knew the hierarchy of those from the most physical to the most experiential, and as such that we understood how each expresses a more fictional but more experiential grammar as we proceed down that list.Mar 24, 2019, 11:46 AMGearóid Walshthe best psychoanalytic writing I have seen has been when it’s synthesized with bodywork. then, it’s not storytelling (with some possible emotional dimension) any more. it’s linked to a material and external standard – something I would still consider highly experimental, but at least with some empirical markers.Mar 24, 2019, 11:49 AMMichael D. AbbottI believe that Freud was right about the following: The super-ego comes from man (the father) and when man is removed, the demonic id possesses women, making them hysterical, while men become infantilized and neurotic.Mar 24, 2019, 12:20 PMMichael D. AbbottFreud is currently unpopular, but he was right about some things. In particular, masculine stoicism in society (from fathers) actually locks down the ego’s potential for hysteria, by curtailing its egoism under a kind of masculine oppression of emotion.

    Contrary to leftist ideology, some oppression is in fact righteous.Mar 24, 2019, 12:22 PMGearóid Walshthe superego also somewhat corresponds to the internalized social contract on the collective level.

    it’s very important to look into that – to see if it’s too harsh and debilitating or whether its views withstand testing.Mar 24, 2019, 12:24 PMQuote by Michael Abbott

    CurtD: Correct. Although, we can say, conversely, that both freudian theory, and feminine strategy, are genetic expressions of the same interests, and that neither freud nor woman chooses their strategy, but is an animal barely conscious, and simply following baser instinct.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-24 11:12:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55908375_10157067345242264_196414199

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/55908375_10157067345242264_1964141999623766016_n_10157067345237264.jpg via james santagataSteven OwenHold back this day is a decent readMar 23, 2019, 11:38 AMVincent PicciottiI’m not sure if we live in 1984 or brave new world

    I’m starting to think we live in brave new world

    Child based orgies are next

    I mean Jesus it’s okay to molest them now

    What’s the next step??Mar 23, 2019, 11:46 AMRaymond WarnerAlways thought Brave New World was the future.Mar 23, 2019, 12:16 PMErich LandserThat’s not really how the meme works but I still like itMar 23, 2019, 12:16 PMZak Douglasread siegeMar 23, 2019, 1:00 PMMason Grey HainesWe live in the turner dairies not 1984Mar 23, 2019, 1:16 PMJason HeisenbergThe Northwest Republic novels by Covington essentially do the same thing 10x better.Mar 23, 2019, 2:04 PMJason HeisenbergYeah, that’s a great one. Chrishinduslambuddhism is hilarious, and how Melbourne is now Mandelabourne.Mar 23, 2019, 2:05 PMShawn Wheeler”Hunter” was better than TD.Mar 23, 2019, 2:10 PMPaul MulquineyMeme variation infinityMar 23, 2019, 6:47 PMDaniel EssIt was. Pierce wrote it with the intention of being a very pointed novel, while the TD was a weekly serial in National Vanguard.Mar 23, 2019, 9:01 PMvia james santagata

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 11:02:00 UTC