(FB 1551447331 Timestamp) YES PSYCHOLOGY IS PLAGUED BY PSEUDOSCIENCE AND YES THE REPLICATION CRISIS DESTROYED ITS CREDIBILITY â —“Paper finds evidence that the reproducibility crisis may already have damaged the trust in psychological science and the perception of its value among lay people beyond repair. https://osf.io/4ukq5 “— Rolf Degen It has in both Psych. and Soc. Cog-Sci Won. Better model is neural networks, neural economy, the Homunculus, hemispheric competition (predatory prey), gender differences, reward systems, division of labor, and that all human behavior is expressible as acquisition using economics. In other words, if you can’t explain human behavior in economic language you’re projecting judgements (biases) to conformity on what is a division of perception, cognition, memory, advocacy, and labor.
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551397685 Timestamp) WEAPONIZED GYNOCENTRISM by JWarren Prescott The primary neurochemical for the pleasure response is dopamine. Yes, itâs evolutionary, however, political power triggers not only dopamine but testosterone in both men and women. Then the dominance/submissiveness hierarchy further rewards individuals as they gain dominance and penalizes them as they lose dominance. Too much dopamine disrupts normal cognitive function and emotions giving rise to errors in judgment and erratic behavior. While it is true that Men are better suited to handle higher levels of testosterone, women have a greater sensitivity to it. Addicted to power? Yeah, pretty much. Now, clear the path to political power by legitimizing victimhood and philanthropy and you have just weaponized gynocentrism.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1551541000 Timestamp) Danny Frederick, IMO (selfishly on my part ) one of your best papers – success and failure of institutions being near and dear to my heart. RE: https://www.academia.edu/38466999/Are_Institutions_Created_by_Collective_Acceptance? CONTEXT QUESTION 0. Could be a little more ‘bold’ in the abstract, because the question you are trying to answer is relevant to the urgent present condition – abstract under rates the argument? My understanding is that you consistently address the arguments of other authors in proper academic fashion, but do you tie your work back to general theory, or general arguments? Or do you intend your audience to interpret each paper in a vacuum rather than as a collection of your works in defense or advocacy of a theory? ANSWERED QUESTION 1. Attributing greater agency to people than they have? (not sure if this is answered) 2. Do institutions(producers) rules (products) and actions (services) fulfill a market demand or fail to fulfill a market demand? (answered) 3. Is the failure to fulfill a market demand due to (a) contrary to demand, (b) limiting demand, (c) assisting demand? (answered) UNANSWERED QUESTION 5. Do you mean to say that status is assigned or that institutions can provide a vehicle for signaling by virtue of either the coercive power delivered to their members or success at competing within the limits of those coercive powers? 6. Is the market demand determined by Moral Intuitions (group strategies), Ethical Intuitions (Organizational Strategies), or Generational, or Gender intuitions (strategies)? 7. Are the Neocon, Marxist, Libertarian, Postmodern, Feminist movements made possible by temporary economic windfalls from hydrocarbons, the industrial and technological revolutions lasting only until asymmetry of underclasses and technology is ameliorated by regression to the mean? And is that the underlying conflict? 8. Are we not only discovering that this luxury makes females and males diverge in demonstration of genetic interests (rather than converge as the left anticipated), but that groups within empires and nation states are seeking expression of genetic interests generating unresolvable conflict of interest? 9. What equilibrium must be established to move in any given direction from existing intellectual, narrative, economic, political, social, and familial orders? 10. Is there any value of scale, or (as in the ancient world) do we regress to the mean and decline slowly in order to preserve what we perceive as benefits of institutional and political scale? thanks.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551561470 Timestamp) By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses. Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy. Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years. Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family. (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551558172 Timestamp) —“The Church was a force for division when Europe needed unity and today it is a force of subversion when we need traditionalism. The church is always on the wrong side of history.”—Andrey Sokoloff
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551561470 Timestamp) By: Bill Joslin Removing barriers allows people to express there preferences more fully. As seen in the Nordics – general differences are more greatly expresses. Further to that, the largest impact over the smallest time horizon to reduce crime and increase productivity in a society is to educate and enfranchise mother’s into the economy. Why? Because values on education and work ethic are learned first from the mother (at home) which deepens instillation of those values. Countries which open education and work to there woman after these being closed to woman see a start increase in productivity and crime reduction in less than ten years. Our issue isn’t woman working but rather an economic situation where woman must work. When woman must work for a family to survive this causes an intra-family competition over resources and resource distribution (marital tensions) – when working for luxuries this competition doesn’t come into play… It ends up being a net benefit for the family. (via Brandon Hayes)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551558172 Timestamp) —“The Church was a force for division when Europe needed unity and today it is a force of subversion when we need traditionalism. The church is always on the wrong side of history.”—Andrey Sokoloff
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551652765 Timestamp) —“A harmless man is no man at all.”—Holly Morrigan
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551645740 Timestamp) —“….I think this is just the Overton Window moving rapidly – which means by 2020 it’s gonna be ripped of the frame, since lefties are accelerating the other way.”—James Santagata Yep. Demographics are destiny. Window is moving fast.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551641165 Timestamp) —“( starvation is the best disinfectant )”—Bill Joslin Ouch. Damn.