(FB 1550946206 Timestamp) R.E. CHRISTIANITY SPECIFICALLY: by John Mark Christians need us. They cannot and will not save themselves. (In the sense of producing sufficient resistance to the Left.) And they know the Left seeks to destroy them. This gives us leverage and the ability to garner their support: “We are the only ones who can save you. You will not have a “Christian-run nation” until Jesus comes back. You don’t have the power to make it happen. BUT together we can ensure you and our shared (family/conservative) values survive. On the other hand, if we don’t work together (if you don’t support our rule-of-law that punishes evil as the Bible commands), then Christianity as you practice it will be outlawed & you will lose everything you value. Work with us (support our solution), you survive, and our shared family/conservative values survive. Refuse to support us, and you lose everything.” We say this knowing that after the shakeout their religion will continue to die and will be the “crazy uncle” of the Right in the meantime. And the negative effects of their universalism will be nipped in the bud by Propertarian law. We can communicate this in a palatable manner: “We have many shared values. You can’t win on your own. Too many people will rebel against a “Christian nation”. However, a sufficient number of people will accept a “Propertarian nation” with no consumer interest, no corrupt politicians, no special interests controlling politics, rule of law enforcing reciprocity, many social policies determined more locally, etc. Your support is valuable to us in making this a reality and doing Romans 8 “punishing evil” better. Let’s do this.
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1550935427 Timestamp) via Andy Ujku-Dardania https://arktos.com/â¦/an-autopsy-on-the-ron-paul-revolution/⦠A very insightful article. âMost of the groups that split from the Ron Paul movement are caught in a political twilight zone, forever pontificating about unattainable and ultimately illogical goals, unable or unwilling to ask the questions that finally, fully explain what makes society function.â âYes, social systems and principles are important, but who builds social systems and outlines principles? People. Humans are not robots that can simply download new moral schemes or codes of conduct; we are animals, many of which cannot understand or be made to care about anything more complex than where the next emotional or sensory thrill will come from.â âIn the end, libertarianism fails because it is trying to answer a question of who? with a description of what. The critical factor in society and politics is not systems and principles as such; it is if and how certain systems and principles can ever be adopted â which leads inevitably to the question of what human material provides fertile ground for what systems and principles. Libertarianism, it turns out, is simply an âautisticâ codifying of what most white males do, and value, without being told. Or, perhaps more accurately, libertarianism is a codifying of what most white males would do, in a world in which they were not browbeaten and fooled into endorsing Marxist egalitarianism.â âAlt-righters, broadly speaking, are just libertarians who realized that we â that is, white people â cannot save the world. We cannot rewire the brains of black or brown people, or even Northeast Asians, so that these groups will, as groups, enthusiastically embrace Lockean property rights. It will simply never happen. A multicultural utopia â of a libertarian or any other variety â is biologically impossible.â
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550932044 Timestamp) STUDY SPAIN TO UNDERSTAND FASCISM —“If you want to understand the history of fascist versus communist struggles of the interwar period between WW1 and WW2—study the story of Spain, and especially the work of Stanley Payne…and to understand the deep historical processes that led to the conflict between Fascists and Communists (and the various sub-factions of each side) in Spain dating back to the 1700s, check out this work….”—Nick
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550953643 Timestamp) (Today in absurd video. Russian cops making some woman do nipple prints in addition to finger prints. Seriously. You just can’t make this stuff up.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550946206 Timestamp) R.E. CHRISTIANITY SPECIFICALLY: by John Mark Christians need us. They cannot and will not save themselves. (In the sense of producing sufficient resistance to the Left.) And they know the Left seeks to destroy them. This gives us leverage and the ability to garner their support: “We are the only ones who can save you. You will not have a “Christian-run nation” until Jesus comes back. You don’t have the power to make it happen. BUT together we can ensure you and our shared (family/conservative) values survive. On the other hand, if we don’t work together (if you don’t support our rule-of-law that punishes evil as the Bible commands), then Christianity as you practice it will be outlawed & you will lose everything you value. Work with us (support our solution), you survive, and our shared family/conservative values survive. Refuse to support us, and you lose everything.” We say this knowing that after the shakeout their religion will continue to die and will be the “crazy uncle” of the Right in the meantime. And the negative effects of their universalism will be nipped in the bud by Propertarian law. We can communicate this in a palatable manner: “We have many shared values. You can’t win on your own. Too many people will rebel against a “Christian nation”. However, a sufficient number of people will accept a “Propertarian nation” with no consumer interest, no corrupt politicians, no special interests controlling politics, rule of law enforcing reciprocity, many social policies determined more locally, etc. Your support is valuable to us in making this a reality and doing Romans 8 “punishing evil” better. Let’s do this.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1550935427 Timestamp) via Andy Ujku-Dardania https://arktos.com/â¦/an-autopsy-on-the-ron-paul-revolution/⦠A very insightful article. âMost of the groups that split from the Ron Paul movement are caught in a political twilight zone, forever pontificating about unattainable and ultimately illogical goals, unable or unwilling to ask the questions that finally, fully explain what makes society function.â âYes, social systems and principles are important, but who builds social systems and outlines principles? People. Humans are not robots that can simply download new moral schemes or codes of conduct; we are animals, many of which cannot understand or be made to care about anything more complex than where the next emotional or sensory thrill will come from.â âIn the end, libertarianism fails because it is trying to answer a question of who? with a description of what. The critical factor in society and politics is not systems and principles as such; it is if and how certain systems and principles can ever be adopted â which leads inevitably to the question of what human material provides fertile ground for what systems and principles. Libertarianism, it turns out, is simply an âautisticâ codifying of what most white males do, and value, without being told. Or, perhaps more accurately, libertarianism is a codifying of what most white males would do, in a world in which they were not browbeaten and fooled into endorsing Marxist egalitarianism.â âAlt-righters, broadly speaking, are just libertarians who realized that we â that is, white people â cannot save the world. We cannot rewire the brains of black or brown people, or even Northeast Asians, so that these groups will, as groups, enthusiastically embrace Lockean property rights. It will simply never happen. A multicultural utopia â of a libertarian or any other variety â is biologically impossible.â
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551030934 Timestamp) (from elsewhere) —…it is very hard for much of the world, and in particular the muslim world, to grasp the function of ‘heroism’ and ‘truth before face’. It is contra-ethical to their intuition. It is however what makes us adapt and innovate thru continuous competition – and them not.—CD
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551019651 Timestamp) FILLING MARKET DEMAND —“Curt: I think one reason you are refreshing is that you are an example of older WASP masculinity. We are taught from a young age that to be masculine “cool”, assertive, that we must adopt the identity or manner of Irish or Italians [bravado] to be masculine white men. And most who are not WASPs implicitly support this, as it lowers our SMV relative to theirs, to have a large segment of their competition deemed stiff, uncool and out of style.”— G.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551033275 Timestamp) THIS DEFINITION OF ALT RIGHT IS ONE I CAN BUY INTO —âAlt-righters, broadly speaking, are just libertarians who realized that we â that is, white people â cannot save the world. We cannot rewire the brains of black or brown people, or even Northeast Asians, so that these groups will, as groups, enthusiastically embrace Lockean property rights. It will simply never happen. A multicultural utopia â of a libertarian or any other variety â is biologically impossible.â— GEORGE T. SHAW I would state lockean property rights as “Heroism and Excellence, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth before Face and Duty before Family, Rule of Law and Competing Markets – in every walk of life- producing disproportionate competitive velocity that compensates for small numbers. Property is a system of measurement for all of the above. Alone, property is just jewish ghetto ethics. As a system of measurement of sovereignty and reciprocity, heroism and markets, truth and duty, it provides the underlying standard of weights and measures.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551032329 Timestamp) I wish I could capture into words the world view when this song was written compared to the world view today. —” There is no pain you are receding A distant ship’s smoke on the horizon You are only coming through in waves Your lips move but I can’t hear what you’re saying “– We lived in a civilizational luxury, at the cost of continuous civilizational warfare. We were dragging mankind out of the dark. But in doing it paid too high a price. The collapse of communism was good for mankind. The collapse of the russian empire, rather than its conversion into a conservative version of european civilization on the eastern european model is the great catastrophe of the second half of the twentieth century. If you had told me that a decade ago I would have disagreed.