(FB 1550236001 Timestamp) —“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-identical with our Law”—Nick Dahlheim
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550282310 Timestamp) —“There’s another way to sum up your approach, Curt Doolittle—Critical Naturalism with an Operational Epistemology requires “metaphysical humility” before the Natural Law. Nature has many undiscovered secrets to be sure, but we use Testimonialism and Scientific investigation rather than metaphysical speculation to gain insight.”–Nick Dahlheim
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550249213 Timestamp) —“Teaching the [christian] myths as factual would be [illegal]. But teaching the myths as myths[lessons] and conveying truthful values through them is good. And Christianity does contain [critically important] truthful values.”—Martin Å tÄpán
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550247431 Timestamp) THE SIMPLE STRATEGY OF THE WEAK By: Rosenborg Predmetsky —“It follows that the physically weaker must engage in subterfuge in order to survive the disgust of the stronger and better-constituted. Leftists and degenerate women disingenuously employ the masculine language of reciprocity in order to conceal the feminine substance of dysgenic equality, in attempting to convince others that they have been defrauded of their just deserts. This is the function of social constructionism; to make the creditor their debtor by arguing that inequality of outcome is the function of a historically contingent narrative rather than the natural order of things.”—- (via Brandon Hayes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550236001 Timestamp) —“Nothing in our Law will undermine your Faith, but your Faith cannot be co-identical with our Law”—Nick Dahlheim
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550343211 Timestamp) TRY IT. by Bill Johnson How could one outsmart a reasonable man (like Curt) who is merely pointing at a truth-testing device? A standard of measure with near NIST-Traceable Calibration. 😉 Curt is not saying he is unbeatable. Rather he is subjecting Propertarianism to the crucible. Bring on the heat. To attack Curt, is not to attack Propertarianism. That would be a fool’s errand. Could they say Curt are pointing at Propertarianism with the wrong hand or finger? Could they say you are not pointing at Propertarianism? That might be more irrational than a Christian Scientist saying his cancer and pain are not real.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550328032 Timestamp) EZRA POUND —“Angered by the carnage of World War I, Pound lost faith in Great Britain and blamed the war on usury and international capitalism. He moved to Italy in 1924 and throughout the 1930s and 1940s embraced Benito Mussolini’s fascism, expressed support for Adolf Hitler, and wrote for publications owned by the British fascist Sir Oswald Mosley. During World War II, he was paid by the Italian government to make hundreds of radio broadcasts criticizing the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Jews, as a result of which he was arrested in 1945 by American forces in Italy on charges of treason.”—
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1550344856 Timestamp) PLEASE. PLEASE DO IT. GIVE US AN EXCUSE. https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/02/15/maxine-waters-calls-for-rallies-across-america-to-send-trump-a-message-no-fake-emergency/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550344302 Timestamp) —“Teaching women philosophy is like teaching boys abstinence.”—Nikolai Petroff (ouch. But there is a grain of truth in that) Did y’all see how oxford is dumbing down the classics degree because women can’t pass it? Damn. What is this world coming to.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550343211 Timestamp) TRY IT. by Bill Johnson How could one outsmart a reasonable man (like Curt) who is merely pointing at a truth-testing device? A standard of measure with near NIST-Traceable Calibration. 😉 Curt is not saying he is unbeatable. Rather he is subjecting Propertarianism to the crucible. Bring on the heat. To attack Curt, is not to attack Propertarianism. That would be a fool’s errand. Could they say Curt are pointing at Propertarianism with the wrong hand or finger? Could they say you are not pointing at Propertarianism? That might be more irrational than a Christian Scientist saying his cancer and pain are not real.