(FB 1548268885 Timestamp) via Brandon Hayes and Rosenborg Predmetsky This is super interesting https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842692/ “Cultureâgene coevolutionary theory posits that cultural values have evolved, are adaptive and influence the social and physical environments under which genetic selection operates. Here, we examined the association between cultural values of individualismâcollectivism and allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter functional polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) as well as the role this cultureâgene association may play in explaining global variability in prevalence of pathogens and affective disorders. We found evidence that collectivistic cultures were significantly more likely to comprise individuals carrying the short (S) allele of the 5-HTTLPR across 29 nations. Results further show that historical pathogen prevalence predicts cultural variability in individualismâcollectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele. Additionally, cultural values and frequency of S allele carriers negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Finally, mediation analyses further indicate that increased frequency of S allele carriers predicted decreased anxiety and mood disorder prevalence owing to increased collectivistic cultural values. Taken together, our findings suggest cultureâgene coevolution between allelic frequency of 5-HTTLPR and cultural values of individualismâcollectivism and support the notion that cultural values buffer genetically susceptible populations from increased prevalence of affective disorders. Implications of the current findings for understanding cultureâgene coevolution of human brain and behaviour as well as how this coevolutionary process may contribute to global variation in pathogen prevalence and epidemiology of affective disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are discussed.”
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle added a new photo to Eli Harman’s timeline.
(FB 1548209761 Timestamp) ( dunno if you saw this but it’s a hilarious compliment and jab at the same time. ) There is an advantage to having a hemisphere between you and the guy you’re teasing… lol
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1548301897 Timestamp) MARGINAL INDIFFERENCE IN FRAMES AND PARADIGMS https://www.studyfinds.org/avoiding-social-media-privacy-still-risk/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548277311 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM’S INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT BY KASH VIKAAS. —“Propertarianism and its proxy testimonialism is the operational theory of critical naturalism (praxis). Naturalism was the dominant theory of modern idealism before postmodernism before grammatology (Derrida) appeared on the scene.”— Well, you know, in the context of grammatology, I also produced the table of the grammars which is sort of the Periodic Table of Speech. My view of Derrida and grammatology is that they’re just updating pilpul (sophism), for the same reason the rabbis invented pilpul (sophism) and the same reason plato invented idealism (sophism). So social construction from the postmoderns, and the prohibition of social construction (sophism) from propertarianism (critical naturalism).
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548357673 Timestamp) —“The solution is for us to stop being reasonable. Stop compromising and start being intolerant and objective. The most intolerant win, and that needs to be us. Propertarianism gives us the tools to be totally intolerant and objective in our demands. This is the reason we are the Winning Right.”–Noah J Revoy
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1548301897 Timestamp) MARGINAL INDIFFERENCE IN FRAMES AND PARADIGMS https://www.studyfinds.org/avoiding-social-media-privacy-still-risk/
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1548277311 Timestamp) PROPERTARIANISM’S INTELLECTUAL CONTEXT BY KASH VIKAAS. —“Propertarianism and its proxy testimonialism is the operational theory of critical naturalism (praxis). Naturalism was the dominant theory of modern idealism before postmodernism before grammatology (Derrida) appeared on the scene.”— Well, you know, in the context of grammatology, I also produced the table of the grammars which is sort of the Periodic Table of Speech. My view of Derrida and grammatology is that they’re just updating pilpul (sophism), for the same reason the rabbis invented pilpul (sophism) and the same reason plato invented idealism (sophism). So social construction from the postmoderns, and the prohibition of social construction (sophism) from propertarianism (critical naturalism).
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1548516629 Timestamp) —“Itâs hard to compare our collective loneliness against that of previous generations, as we simply havenât been measuring it consistently, but recent estimates suggest that anywhere from 22% to 75% of American adults are persistently lonely”— This is the end result of hyperconsumption.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
(FB 1548516629 Timestamp) —“Itâs hard to compare our collective loneliness against that of previous generations, as we simply havenât been measuring it consistently, but recent estimates suggest that anywhere from 22% to 75% of American adults are persistently lonely”— This is the end result of hyperconsumption.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
(FB 1548433145 Timestamp) YEAH IT SURE LOOKS MESSY. SO DOES MATH. —“it’s like languages were to be spoken not written down. if you can’t write 5 volumes on your ideas, that I can’t read it at all. Don’t get me wrong your work is correct but it’s so god damn awful messy”—Mediocre Croat Yes, um, spoken grammar and written grammar are different because it is easier to continually disambiguate speech with tone and paus than the written word with () , …, -. ;, ,., lol. On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the completion of the scientific method and applies it to every single field at some level or other in order to create a commensurable and therefore testable language. So, on average 6m-2y to learn it. You’re a smart enough guy and you can probably undrestand the grammars, the operational grammar, the epistemology, and the law fairly easily. (This is what people tell me.) But since we combine terms from so many disciplines and disambiguate them so heavily, terms are a pain. No other way to turn a lot of ‘very conflated colloquial language’ for the purpose of discounts on conveying meaning by free association, into a set of measurements for the purpose of prohibiting ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, fraud, and deceit prohibiting free assoc. There is no short route to algebraic geometry, no short route to the current law, and not short route to testimonial speech. Just is what it is. As Max Weber suggested, the future would consist entirely of reducing all knowledge to some form of calculation. Not that someone wont come along after me and simplify it, but honestly how do you simplify something as simple as this: https://www.facebook.com/thepropertarianinstitute/posts/1989176281196492 ⦠Aside from the Grammars and Operational Grammar that’s about has simple as it can be.