Form: Quote Commentary

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544306457 Timestamp) A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others. … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseq…See More —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—- Does it? Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law. “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”. We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler. Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544380948 Timestamp) GENDER BIOCHEMISTRY by Bill Joslin As far as I can tell – testosterone in men increases in-group loyalty and bonding (ingroup preference) but not out-group hostility. Oxytocin in women increases out-group hostility. This makes sense. Women in charge of young (reduced mobility and defense) by being outgroup sensitive would afford “proximity” sensing for a group (enemies are at the gates). Men who must then defend, do so cooperatively and this ingroup loyalty would have men fight to protect each other (opposed to fighting to kill an enemy or flee and abandon brothers). The two together: female-low resolution high sensitivity may not provide much detail in assessing the quality of a threat (those strangers might not be hostile, they might be, but might not be) – where as men, driven by loyalty will approach and assess the threat (they are not necessarily out-group hostile) and if it is a threat will not flee, but rather stand and defend. So we have a binary, at a distance, early warning (female) coupled with a spectrum, approach and assess defense (male). Our current migrant sentiment might be best seen as a female out-group hostility turned in on the ingroup (toward their own males due to feminist political power seeking) coupled with or playing off males low outgroup hostility and high loyalty (to their woman). We might harp on the girls in Curt’s circles – but it is the gals through mate selection who drive changes in males (hypergamy creates male hierarchy and selects for robustness and agression or the inverse as laid-out above). Girls maketh the man. It’s then males that provide a counter-balance. Women drive changes, men constrain the tails.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544310847 Timestamp) by Alex Macleod The magical yellow vest is great, because it has no significance or association (not even the motoring association really) and is anonymous, anyone can ‘take up arms’ under this banner, for any purpose, and it can deflect all the accusations thrown at known flags and regalia of left or right or centre. The powers are much diminished in their ability to ‘know your enemy’.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544306457 Timestamp) A PROFOUND LESSON IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING —“Curt, First of all, I’ll correct a point you make that is actually mistaken. It’s commonly made by leftists in connection with the First Amendment: …”The rule of law does not protect the people other than it limits the state, under the courts, to actions permitted in the constitution…”… No, it also obliges the state to protect its citizens from infringement of rights posed by others. … Two, the constitution is not absolutist. It is not law that encodes in itself as law indelibility. That being said, although I am not a constitutional law expert, I believe that it does enshrine a set of principles that cannot be controverted by subseq…See More —“…rule of law…obliges the state..”—- Does it? Read the constitution and find that. You wont. And its very interesting that you wont. The inference is in the preamble, and in the second paragraph of the declaration. Why? under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law. We bear the burden. We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule. The rule the left has sought to restore. By circumventing the constitution via the weakness in it: the supreme court’s ability to make law. “Every man a citizen, a sheriff, a warrior, a sovereign”. We are not continental serfs, or obliged britons. We are americans – and the state but a service like any other we consume. and if that is no longer the case, then we are equally permitted under our declaration and constitution to replace this government which restores our rule and revokes rule from that government-become-ruler. Curt Doolittle

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544543671 Timestamp) —“I’ve never been a fan of Mr. Doolittle. Most of his commentary is pure gibberish. Written as if he were drunk at the time.”— Chris Shaeffer Why I am harder to understand than Bohm Bawerk, Nietzsche, Hegel, or Heidegger is beyond me. I think the principle difference between readers who grasp quickly and those who don’t is of course, IQ, but whether you have been exposed to the scientific method, programming, and economics sufficiently to ‘think scientifically’ in each of the dimensions: diligence(Science), operations(programming), equilibrations(economics). There are twenty something novel inventions in propertarianism. They can easily be understood. What is difficult is putting them into practice – particularly use of the definitions, series, incentives, and their equilibrations.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544644340 Timestamp) Papers by Japan’s Dr. Kenya Kura —“Dr. Kenya Kura of Japan has quite a few papers on racial differences in behavior and cognitive ability and he actual teaches on economics and racial differences. In one of his works, he argues that although East Asians have higher average IQs than Caucasians, they win far fewer Nobel Prizes because of their tendency towards low risk-taking and low-sensation seeking.”— by Rosenborg Predmetsky Links below added by CurtD https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282411443_Why_do_Northeast_Asians_win_so_few_Nobel_Prizes_1 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265090206_The_correlation_between_g_loadings_and_heritability_in_Japan_A_meta-analysis https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262383148_Cognitive_function_among_the_Ainu_people https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259098419_Japanese_north-south_gradient_in_IQ_predicts_differences_in_stature_skin_color_income_and_homicide_rate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265525298_Do_testosterone_levels_in_females_have_influence_on_the_distrust_game_the_beauty_contest_game_and_risk-aversion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544605074 Timestamp) by Pat Ryan To recap, stem cells are coerced into specialization as a byproduct of endless bacteriophage and virus flow perpetually offsetting the magnificent exponential power of mitosis. Having one universal cell for all time proved to be impossible due to potentially fatal delays in energy availability. AKA energy isn’t universally abundant for the singular cell and so pressures selected for different cellular strategies. Mitosis speed variation, thickness in membranes, organelle placement and function, replication techniques, DNA structure, RNA methodology, etc. Each variable tuned ever so slightly per generation and tested under the crucible of entropy and bacteriophage. Specialization was inevitable under these circumstances. Cells do “cooperate” in a manner that their structural biases assume other systemic pressures will be reliably available. For example, most cells don’t handle their own immunological defensiveness because they have grown to assume an immune system is actively on the job. This is less a “cooperation” in an empathy sense and more of a “we don’t know any better, we just do one thing” ecosystem adapting to its own metastructure.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544658549 Timestamp) –“In a discussion of Japanese religious psychology, Brendan Branley, a Maryknoll missionary to Japan, has noted that “essentially, there is a heightened consciousness of their identity as a distinct people, of their membership in a group whose purposes they are willing to serve at the expense of their own.” This observation is supported by Robert BelSah’s analysis of the relationship between Japanese religion and economic development. Bellah describes the enduring notion of kokutai, which arose during the Tokugawa Period (1600-1868) as “a concept of the state in which religious, political and familistic ideas are indissolubly merged.”39 Jesuit missionaries to China in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were similarly confronted with a high level of organic unity that was expressed through ancestor and emperor worship. A strong sense of social unity and collective security also prevailed among the Germanic peoples in the early Middle Ages. Although they may have been less culturally sophisticated than the contemporary Japanese, like them, the Germanic peoples did not have immediate social or spiritual needs which Christianity might fulfill. Also, the homogeneity of early medieval Germanic society, like that of contemporary Japan, did not predispose it to the Christian message. Christianity tends to flourish in heterogeneous societies in which there exist high levels of anomie, or social destabilization. Since the relationship of social structure to ideological structure and religious expression will play a significant role in this inquiry, a brief discussion of fundamental concepts is presented here. Similarly, the Anglo-Saxon missionaries did not emphasize the central soteriological and eschatological aspects of Christianity. Instead, seeking to appeal to the Germanic regard for power, they tended to emphasize the omnipotence of the Christian God and the temporal rewards he would bestow upon those who accepted him through baptism and through conformity to the discipline of his Church.52 Other medieval advocates of Christianity, such as the authors of the Heliand53 and The Dream of the Rood,54 apparently sought to appeal to the Germanic ethos and world-view by portraying Christ as a warrior lord.”— from The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity by James Russell https://propertarianism.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/russell-james-c-the-germanization-of-early-medieval-christianity-_-a-sociohistorical-approach-to-religious-transformation-1994-oxford-university-press.pdf

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544648838 Timestamp) DIFFERENCES —“Compared with Whites, Native Hawaiians had higher androstenedione (+22%, P = 0.017), total testosterone (+26%, P = 0.013), bioavailable testosterone (+33%, P = 0.002), E1 (≥21%; P = 0.009), total E2 (+26%, P = 0.001), bioavailable E2 (+31%, P < 0.001), and lower SHBG (−12% P = 0.07) levels. Compared with Whites, Japanese Americans had higher E2 (+15%, P = 0.036) and bioavailable E2 (+18%, P = 0.024) levels. African Americans also had higher E1 (+21%, P = 0.004), E2 (+20%, P = 0.007), and bioavailable E2 (+20%, P = 0.015) levels compared with Whites, whereas mean levels in Latinas were similar to those of Whites.”—-

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1544605074 Timestamp) by Pat Ryan To recap, stem cells are coerced into specialization as a byproduct of endless bacteriophage and virus flow perpetually offsetting the magnificent exponential power of mitosis. Having one universal cell for all time proved to be impossible due to potentially fatal delays in energy availability. AKA energy isn’t universally abundant for the singular cell and so pressures selected for different cellular strategies. Mitosis speed variation, thickness in membranes, organelle placement and function, replication techniques, DNA structure, RNA methodology, etc. Each variable tuned ever so slightly per generation and tested under the crucible of entropy and bacteriophage. Specialization was inevitable under these circumstances. Cells do “cooperate” in a manner that their structural biases assume other systemic pressures will be reliably available. For example, most cells don’t handle their own immunological defensiveness because they have grown to assume an immune system is actively on the job. This is less a “cooperation” in an empathy sense and more of a “we don’t know any better, we just do one thing” ecosystem adapting to its own metastructure.