(FB 1542396784 Timestamp) —I’m sure there is a solution that can “protect the commons” and provide an efficient and cost-effective solution. My understanding is that passenger flights are required to carry USPS, where the private companies must own their own planes. Curt Doolittle maybe you can chime in a propertarian solution to this problem?”—@[572309326:2048:Bryan Nova Brey] The problem is the cost of government employees. The service is also supported by spam mail none of us want (or need, in the age of the internet). All political services can be provided by libraries (forms etc). All shipping better provided by private agencies. Selling it whole yet requiring all domestic postcards, and ‘letters’ at a subsidized price would solve the problem. Insuring the private postal service and ups and anyone else for that matter, the way we insure banks (insurer of last resort) in the case of national emergency is adequate.
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542562192 Timestamp) —“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542562192 Timestamp) —“The left tests the limits capital accumulation. The right tests the limits of capital outlay (consumption).”— Skye Stewart
-
(FB 1542560560 Timestamp) USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACRO
(FB 1542560560 Timestamp) USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept) One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit. Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism. -hugs brother.
-
(FB 1542560560 Timestamp) USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACRO
(FB 1542560560 Timestamp) USING SERIES TO TEST A LINE OF CONSTANT RELATIONS ACROSS SCALES —“Always love this structure of Aphorism”— A Twitter Friend danqueseq (referring to use of series to illustrate a concept) One point – an ideal, or ideal type – tells you nothing. Three points to test a line. More points falsify the line such that it is increasingly free of ignorance, error, bias and deceit. Hence, demand for definitions in series as a defense against conflation, inflation, and fictionalism. -hugs brother.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542558043 Timestamp) IDEALS VS LIMITS by Bill Joslin The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to moral foundations asserted as universal and well… An ideal…. Opposed to the notion that all concepts exist with in limits (boundaries and context). By doing so, following a moral foundation which doesn’t acknowledge proper conditions which allows that action to exist has said action producing different and often opposite effects (ideal morals often result in immoral outcomes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542558043 Timestamp) IDEALS VS LIMITS by Bill Joslin The notion of “ideal and unlimited” pertains to moral foundations asserted as universal and well… An ideal…. Opposed to the notion that all concepts exist with in limits (boundaries and context). By doing so, following a moral foundation which doesn’t acknowledge proper conditions which allows that action to exist has said action producing different and often opposite effects (ideal morals often result in immoral outcomes )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557719 Timestamp) GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Garner Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west. I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea. The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky. Itâs simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us âfree menâ again. Iâve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry. In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557719 Timestamp) GOVERNING IS SIMPLE IF TRUTHFUL AND DIFFICULT IF DECEITFUL AND CORRUPT by JG Garner Agreed. Black and white. Dark or light. North or south. East or west. I read a book a few years back. A book well known to many. I will paraphrase the general idea. The author wrote governing is not hard. It is easy. The corrupt make it complicated. The compromised make the waters murky. Itâs simple. Is it good for the nation? Is it good for the economy? Does it weaken us? Do we want those convicted of the most heinous crimes to still breath. As long as they live, they could be amongst us âfree menâ again. Iâve provided a small paragraph on an entire chapter. But you get my point. Things should be pretty cut and dry. In the criminal justice system we now look at the accused in a sympathetic view. Was his life hard? Did his parents beat him? Ect. The only thing we need to unwind is was a crime committed? Did the accused commit said crime? Is the victim dead or injured.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1542557522 Timestamp) THE NATURAL ORDER by Bill Joslin Patriarchy is older than humans. Patriarchy evolves naturally because nature rewards ability and action (and nothing else). Patriarchy is driven by female sexual selection in all animals (including humans until the counter culture). Females with offspring produce demands (food, protection, shelter etc). Males provide supply (build shelters, provide protection, find food etc) and limits to consumption. Men are better equipped to secure communities (and nations) than women. Further to that men are expendable (do not produce children, can mate in seconds then die etc – where as women need gestation time and to raise children i.e. expensive) thus men are a better choice for dangerous work (protections, hunting, high-risk occupations). Women who chose men who are better able to provide and this increase their likelihood to survive. Those who choose differently will not thrive. Those men better disposed to these task will rise above others. This results in patriarchy. Patriarchy will always rise, if not explicitly it will be implicit (even the modern feminist manifestation only exists because of the support by a stack of powerful men ) When our laws take in consideration natural phenomena and also what undergirds these phenomena (survival strategies) then a proper patriarchy will be restored. A proper aristocracy will be restored. Islam won’t do this. Why? It’s a River Delta survival strategy adapted to a desert people (raider’s strategy). It scales up well, but crumbles under its own weight and tends to destroy human flourishing. Anglos got it right – velocity via natural law (judge discovered law), empiricism and shallow -via negativa- moral foundations (which results in velocity). This produces the best survival strategy Where this has failed has been universalism and idealistic moral foundations both of which are a result of Abrahamic rhetoric – the first middle eastern invasion of Europe .