–“Voting is a tool to reduce violence amongst a
warrior class within a polity. Modern war
opened the warrior class to all men and
therefore the franchise was then extended to
them. Women are not, as a class, effective
warriors yet they have been granted the
rights of fighting men.”–Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:58:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426233737644983
(…continued)
Why? “The desire for equality under poverty, monopoly under the herd, authority over markets, and feminine dysgenia over masculine eugenia.:
“The Mindless Equalitarian Dysgenic Herd.”
There is and can never be equality. The demand for equality is to devolve mankind to one’s own lowest level – as an animal. The demand of aristocracy is to evolve mankind into one’s own level – transcend the animal into reason. THe anglo enlightenment experiment has been one of attempting to raise man into an ‘aristocracy of everyone’ and it has failed because only our kin appear able to do so – and even then some men and many women resist it.
The reason Jewish Christians are “Cucks’ and do not fight against the enemy is because their debt, loyalty, and fealty, is to the ancestral enemy of our people – and not to Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
The reason Aryan Christians are ‘not cucks’ is that we fight against the enemy because our debt, loyalty, reality is to our ancestors, Family, Kith, Kin, Nature, Excellence and heroism, Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Jury and Law and Markets in Every Aspect of Life.
Choose Aryan Christianity of Kin and our persistence, or Semitic Christianity of the Enemy against our kin and your extermination.
I am An Aryan, An Aristotelian, A Heathen, A Christian.
Because that is all I can be, while maintaining the debt, loyalty, and fealty to my kin, my people, my ancestors, nature, the universe, and transcendence of man into the great gods our ancients imagined.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:48:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426193407615382
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and foremost: 1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism), 2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d 3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature). I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt. I can however, be: 4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I: a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason; b) claim belief in a falsehood; c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin. Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks (a) abandon reason, (b) claim belief in falsehood, and (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin. The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is: (a) False promise(lying), (b) Sophism(lying), (c) Straw Manning(lying), (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth), (e) Denial(lying), (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial. There is no difference between: (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and; (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression) The First wave of Abrahamists created (a) Judaism to undermine, (b) Christianity to undermine further, and (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened. … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason. The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts: (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism. (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness. … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!). (continued…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947
THE GAINS TO BE HAD FLUSHING AND CUTTING TIES WITH WEAKNESS AND TREACHERY
—“The harder you go against enemies; the more of your own, moved by sympathy or weakness, will defect to the other side. This too, can have positive returns, up to a point. But there is probably also a limit beyond which it is counter productive. The main risk is endangering the eventual achievement of any kind of victory. The secondary risk is of achieving one at too high a cost. But to the side of the optimum on which we presently find ourselves, there are still gains to be picked up in flushing out and cutting ties with weakness and treachery among our supposed ingroup.”—Ely Harman
We don’t want ALL our own. This is an OPPORTUNITY to exit them not a challenge to be overcome.
(eli as master of the game, writing in poetry)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425558507118949
THE PHILISTINES WERE AGEANS
ie: the minoan relocation theory is true.
—“The ancient Mediterranean port city of Ashkelon, identified as “Philistine” during the Iron Age, underwent a marked cultural change between the Late Bronze and the early Iron Age. It has been long debated whether this change was driven by a substantial movement of people, possibly linked to a larger migration of the so-called “Sea Peoples.” Here, we report genome-wide data of 10 Bronze and Iron Age individuals from Ashkelon. We find that the early Iron Age population was genetically distinct due to a European-related admixture. This genetic signal is no longer detectible in the later Iron Age population. Our results support that a migration event occurred during the Bronze to Iron Age transition in Ashkelon but did not leave a long-lasting genetic signature.
The most likely scenario has long been that the Biblical Philistines were a composition population, made of Aegean folk who mixed with the local Canaanite substrate. These results confirm that.”—
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 23:53:54 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425508775576115
Again we have known about this phenomenon for decades and it’s an artifact of memory.
—“One instance of this sort of simple manifestation (I visualize the item, feel the emotions I associate with that item, wistfully muse “I wish I had a ____” and Shazam! The item appears out of nowhere) would be mere coincidence. “—
Or it’s that some set of columns has stumbled upon a prediction alerts your thalamus enough to excite a few neurons in your frontal lobes, and you feel the impulse to visualize that which you have already predicted. (This happens all the time.)
The smarter you are the more it happens. The more you spend in the free association “zone” the more frequently it happens.
—“yet must also admit there is more going on”—
That is different from claiming a thing, testifying to a thing, depending upon such a thing, or asking others to depend upon a thing, or even suggesting that they might depend upon a thing – even if such a thing is true.
I have worked on this problem quite a bit and as far as I can tell, and as far as any ‘magician’ and ‘debuker’ can tell, it’s all suggestion. The best way to test yourself on these ‘metaphysical’ question sis to learn the art of suggestion.
My favorite example is a woman who ‘feels’ something is wrong on the bust but doesn’t realize it’s the breathing of people behind her that is cueing her.
The most common is subjectivity to the same information produces synchronicity without communication.
So that means I can’t find a reason to think it’s other than synchronicity and suggestion by exposure to information.
Doesn’t mean I don’t feel the same thing sometimes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:44:56 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424765784835464
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424764699895143
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
( …. continued:) So given that reason and then science evolved from law, and law dependent upon testimony, and that we are seeking to produce in the science that degree of testimony we would produce in court, then I see nothing terribly novel about continuing and completing that evolutionary process. In other words, science adopted operational prose as a means of suppressing the untestifiable. And I can see no reason why we would not extend this from the sciences to the pseudosciences – especially those which are used to construct and enforce law. —“The reason I care at all about this metaphysics issue is because I must partially disagree with the last line in the 18MAR2018 statement. While the list Curt provides is a good start, it is just a start, just a tip, and I suspect there is a whole lot more as yet unseen and undescribed to that iceberg. “— Despite trying, and the efforts of tens of thousands of researchers we cannot find a single case that is inexplicable by naturalistic means. In other words, I can’t find a reason to put money on (demonstrated belief in) other than common cognitive artifacts. —“That course was SOM 212: Myth & Spirit – The Life of Joseph Campbell”— My argument is that if metaphysics refers to what exists, then what do we name the study of the imaginary and fictional. In other words, how do we disambiguate between the operational, and the non? That does not mean that we do not find solace, escape, entertainment, ideation, or wisdom in fictional worlds. it does mean that we cannot testify to them or use them in argument (truth testing, evidence, persuasion, law). —“I have observed many, many, demonstrations of this effect which go far beyond pop psych positive thinking, social group effect, and anything else reasonably explicable by conventional Newtonian understanding of a mechanistic universe. “— As far as I know we have understood this phenomenon since the late seventies as nothing more than synchronicity when subject to the same information. We cannot find a single case otherwise. —“Rather, an example of this metaphysical (meaning, we just do not yet know how the black box of the universe does it) effect would be my thinking about a certain extremely unusual item, which I have not seen for many years, while in a fuge state washing dishes in the evening, then the next day driving down the road find that this exact item has literally fallen out of the sky and is laying there on the center line of a deserted stretch of road right in front of me (fell off a truck, presumably).”— (continued….)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424764699895143
—“We Sense The World Fine] with the extension that while I’d agree we sense it fine, we demonstrably do not sense it completely -at least, not via direct experience of our senses. For example, radio waves exist and contain information yet unless we have a loose filling in a tooth which happens to be tuned to the same frequency as a transmitter, we do not appreciate any information in the signal. Technology allows us to access radio waves while our unaided senses would be unaware they exist (thanks, Marconi).”—
Yes, we sense only that which is actionable, since brains are extremely expensive, and the inactionable is a waste of calories. Hence why we can’t see the infrared.
—“The second statement, or first if taken chronologically (18MAR2018: What Is Your Personal Philosophy As It Relates To Ethics and Metaphysics? Why?] elicits more agreement and a couple more caveats. The first is that “why” is a philosophical question rather than a scientific question,”—
Incentives are just as scientific (open to description in general rules, constructed from observations (measurements).) As far as i know all human behavior is open to description by incentives and information error in our cognition. This might be because I am current on both cog sci, neurology, and comp sci.
—“but my perception is that P is actually a philosophy at this point rather than a science (if it was a science then the question would asl “how” rather than “why”) so this is internally consistent.”—-
I am not sure that defines the discipline of science because it produces an arbitrary distinction between our state of measurement of invariant processes (physical) with measurement of variant processes (cognitive), despite the fact that we have at present a fairly good understanding of the physical process which produce experience and cognition by physical means.
Moreover, as far as I understand our present knowledge of the wave, particle and upward universe, there is no possibility for the transmission of information by other means within that state of the universe.
My understanding of the discipline of science after a century of failure to articulate a via-positiva method, is that it consists of whatever due diligences are necessary such that through the use of observation, measurement, and deduction, to reduce that which is beyond our senses, perception, reason, and memory, to analogies to experience that can be tested(compared) within the limits of our sense, perception, reason, and memory, such that we can warranty that we do not engage in fiction, ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading, framing, obscurantism, fictionalisms (sophism, pseudoscience, mysticism), fraud, or outright deceit.
(continued….)
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:43:23 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424759624047899
NFANTILE AUTHORITARIAN ECHO CHAMBERS
—“Fascism, racism and anti-semitism are doing pretty good in my FB feed tbh😆”—Arran Byrnes
Echo chambers echo precisely because they’re empty.
Miltants like (R)Fascists and (L)Communists mater because they will take up arms.
Conservatives, Libertarians, and Centrists matter because the eliminate the need to. (Or at least reduce the body count.)
I’m a universalist, ethnocentric, nationalist, by Rule of Law under Natural Law, fascist because its the optimum human condition that does not result in hyper-consumption, de-civilization, parasitism, predation, dysgenia, conquest, genocide, and endemic warfare.
In other words, there is no argument against this form of ‘fascism’ – intolerance for parasitic conquest of others – that is not reducible to lying as a means of engaging in parasitic conquest of others.
One cannot choose corporation over kinship for others without engaging in genocide. Therefore the only restitution for attempted genocide is the same by reciprocity. Ergo do not engage in such.
So war is necessary to correct the condition, but once correcting the condition one and one’s people must maintain competitive advantage sufficient to eliminate repetition of conquest by other means.
That is what I propose … because I am not ‘infantile’, ignorant, and lacking experience with incentives, organization, strategy, logistics, and scale.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424748798008982
THE ECONOMICS AND ETHICS OF ENDING DEMOCRACY
—“He [Doolittle] understands the what, but not the why. People are being dumbed down not because they are forced to, but because they desire to be. We naturally seek the path of least resistance, the easy and uncomplicated.”—Jeni Bolotovski
(…Aside from the fact that yes, dumbing people down, eradicating their history, traditions, customs, and laws, has been an intentional ambition of the marxist, socialist, postmodernist program….)
I would frame it differently as we seek the greatest return in the shortest time at the least effort, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest risk.
(Return, Time, Effort, Certainty, Risk.)
And that at present the possibility of marginal improvement for marginal increase in knowledge is questionable.
And the only harm is that it makes democracy impossible, and requires we return to demonstrated proficiency before obtaining influence over others.
In other words, without incentive to work for the franchise, or to work for membership in consumption (the middle class) then there is no return on reduction of ignorance.
And I agree. Ergo. Return to demonstrated ability to participate in the franchise (application of violence/force by means of voting).
We can either educate everyone sufficiently to participate in those decisions that require knowledge of math, science, history, economics, psychology, sociology, and law – or, recognizing the failure our our experiment – we can once again limit participation in decisions to those that demonstrate it by achievement (economically self sufficient intergenerational families free of criminal activities, owners of business (small) and industry(large) who risk personal capital, and territorial governors (cities vs territories), and a decider of last resort (monarchy) who has veto power over all of the above.
So I agree….
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:37:51 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424737939020144
—“Adult neuronal networks are composed of neurons that are born sequentially during development and slowly mature according to genetic and environmental cues. Once established, those circuits, although plastic to some extent, cannot be dramatically altered.”—
You are born with neurons (switch boxes (routers?)) and axons (cables) that cannot be replaced, even if dendrites and axon terminals (plugs), and synapses (wires) can grow (create), connect (update), reinforce (read), and disconnect (delete.)
The fundamental problems of neurons are, that a neuron cell body must supply its entire mini-network of dendrites, axon, axon terminals and synapses, that and memories are structurally(physically) retained.
We know a heart is good for 3B beats and there is not much we can do about it. I do not know the equivalent durability of a neuron but because of massive parallelization, redundancy, continuous memory reformation, and continuous abstraction of general rules, we can tolerate a great deal of decline and decay and still function at the cost of new learning, rates of recognition, and overall calculation, because calculation in the brain is a process of competition for successful prediction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:35:40 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424729368297652
—“Good tort law punishes frivolous lawsuits sufficiently to keep them to a manageable level. If you want to sue somebody for not warranting their speech you are going to have to warranty the speech you use to accuse them in your lawsuit. … Reciprocity in all things.”—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:33:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424719696889043