Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “Strong nations are made of strong communities. Strong communities are made of s

    —“Strong nations are made of strong communities. Strong communities are made of strong families. Attacking the family is attacking the nation. Hence, feminism, gender dysphoria, porn, women in the workplace etc.”– Claire Elise II

    EXACTLY… moreover, family, extended family, and community TRAIN DEVELOPMENT when most of these issues are developmental because of (a) schools are bad for people and (b) they are not being socialized (trained), and their going crazy and becoming maladapted, because they’re developmentally being disabled.

    Why? because of “You are a precious individual snowflake needing to express your uniqueness”, rather than a bunch of randomly rolled genes needing to be trained so that you’re a functioning adult able to train the next generation.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:51:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508076336583165

  • “And, stop telling kids they can be whatever they want. It’s a lie. Tell them th

    —“And, stop telling kids they can be whatever they want. It’s a lie. Tell them they can be whatever they’re develop the skill and qualifications to be, given the supply of people with those skills and qualifications, in the market for people with those skills and qualifications.”— Claire Elise II

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:51:28 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508074659512569

  • “You are a precious individual snowflake needing to express your uniqueness”, ra

    —“You are a precious individual snowflake needing to express your uniqueness”, rather than a bunch of randomly rolled genes needing to be trained so that you’re a functioning adult able to train the next generation.”— CD

    This is so true. This generation has been consumed by narcissism. It’s just a trick to make them obedient and anti family.
    –Paul Norris

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508072631820221

  • AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER? —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo

    AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER?

    —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo chamber.”—Alan Levinovitz

    What you mean is, you want to be able to coerce people with disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, reputation destruction, sophism, and pseudoscience rather than exchange value with them in the markets private or common(government).

    I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.

    So what do you have to trade instead of engaging in the straw man critique of “echo chamber” as an act of sophistry to distract from having nothing to exchange, or trying to ‘cheat’ them, when the only moral constraints that exist are those between cooperators not their enemies?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508068996006457

  • “Constitutions put the risk into monarchies. Absolutism removes it.”— Bill Jos

    —“Constitutions put the risk into monarchies. Absolutism removes it.”—

    Bill Joslin

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:49:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508067925885537

  • ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY. —“I’m not su

    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FRAUD, IDEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY.

    —“I’m not sure how pointing out that religions institutionalize echo chambers, in a conversation about echo chambers, means anything like whatever you just said. I’m concerned with ideological homogeneity in all forms. That’s why I criticize it”—

    Good point. So what about ideological competition vs simple truth and reciprocity in everything? In other words what is the purpose of ideology other than power under democracy, philosophy other than power under aristocracy, religion in opposition to aristocracy? Why any of them?

    As far as I know sophism, pseudoscience, fraud, ideology, philosophy, theology, are just means of avoiding engaging in private (economy) and public markets (politics), in order to obtain something by stealing it rather than trading for it. This problem is undermining democracy.

    So, we all create echo chambers and most of the literature, especially in behavioral economics, focuses on various forms of selection bias. The thing is that it’s NECESSARY because groups have different degrees of agency, and the commons is saturated with undecidable falsehoods.

    Those of us with the necessary talents are as ignorant of the demands of the common people given our market for falsehoods, as they are limited by dunning kruger in falsifying them. ie: networks of common paradigms are necessary. Our only universal is law of tort (reciprocity).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508065836578181

  • TRYING TO “FIT” DEMOCRACY —“Well, I guess that means there’s no way to disting

    TRYING TO “FIT” DEMOCRACY

    —“Well, I guess that means there’s no way to distinguish echo chambers from reality?”—Alan Levinovitz

    It means that the only reality is reciprocity, and that people demonstrate demand for different paradigms that suit their degrees of agency. You and I can learn anything and do whatever we set our minds to. This is not true of, or possible for, all. Hence markets and law.

    So, democracy then is limited to small groups with homogenous abilities, interests, and paradigms for the selection of priorities, rather than large heterogeneous groups with hetero abilities, interests, paradigms – hence markets. We must govern the people we have, not wish to.

    Else we result in the current simmering civil war, with opposing group strategies, and a winner-take all government, over a territory and population the scale of empires. So we try to solve a problem of fitting,when the problem is the system we place faith in despite its failure.

    Scientific reality exists, reciprocal reality exists, but the narratives we use to negotiate with one another given heterogeneous abilities and interests in an imperial population are not ‘real’ but imaginary and utilitarian. Science and law decide differences. Stories create opportunities for similarities.

    (Giving you food for thought. -cheers)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:48:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508063636614653

  • —“Can creating family-friendly cities help bridge America’s urban-rural divide?”

    —“Can creating family-friendly cities help bridge America’s urban-rural divide?”—

    It’s working fine. Without third world underclass immigration urbanites would have solved the political divide of individualism vs familialism by reproductive deltas that
    the market and scientific research achieved by hard work and discipline. Oh wait. Children are hard work too.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:48:10 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508061656757454

  • “No matter what, everyone make sure you’re ready to go by summer of next year at

    —“No matter what, everyone make sure you’re ready to go by summer of next year at the latest. Have your teams, plans, etc all drawn up. Coordinate with other groups if possible on non social network sites. My bet is still around election time, but some SF friends of mine are predicting 2022(middle of Trumps 2nd term).”—Corey Harms

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:45:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508050354723887

  • “So, then, “no” to reparations?”—Lee C Waaks The other way ’round. Force them

    —“So, then, “no” to reparations?”—Lee C Waaks

    The other way ’round. Force them to pay for their legacy of thousands of years of bad decisions, by limiting or prohibiting their reproduction in exchange for material subsidy given their ‘birth defect’ of genetic heritage.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:44:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508048799497374