Form: Quote Commentary

  • WE HAVE A NEW SMART GUY 😉 —“You’re not the first person I’ve encountered for

    WE HAVE A NEW SMART GUY 😉

    —“You’re not the first person I’ve encountered for whom Hans-Hermann Hoppe was the capstone that raised them from intelligent libertarian to dissident right. Sovereigntarianism is the best fleshed-out dissident right philosophy, with perhaps the only real competitor being Nick Landian Dark Enlightenment/accelerationism. But the latter is far more, shall we say, “Continental,” in its nature and outlook. Someone should go to school and smuggle these ideaspheres into academia—upload these right proper dangerous thought viruses straight into the Cathedral’s mainframe. One appealing to spergs like us, and Landianism appealing to schizos. In fact, I may do that myself.”—Duke Newcomb


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 20:36:00 UTC

  • OUCH (KINSELLA) —“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast.

    OUCH (KINSELLA)

    —“I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

    Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak and cowardly, to organise militarily to create rule of law by reciprocity,under demonstrated interests, enumerated as property, and to insure it equally, producing a condition of sovereignty. Liars all.

    —“So, you’re in favor of aggression? Hitting innocent people in the head with bricks, for example? Or not? Just to be clear.”—Stephan Kinsella @NSKinsella

    I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?

    Reciprocity: Productive, Fully informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests, Free of imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated interests of the others by externality. This describes all property possible, not just intersubjectively verifiable, or subjective.

    Which is how Rothbard, in typical fashion, leaves the door open for voluntary, but otherwise ir-reciprocal parasitism, by such means of blackmail, baiting into hazard, the sufficiency of volition alone, despite externalities, and plausible deniability of having done so.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 19:57:00 UTC

  • “Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge

    —“Terminology comes after knowledge, not before; it’s the philosophical knowledge they lack, not terminology.”—Drew John

    Possibly, although paradigms and terms form systems of comparison and measurement. And moreover, although sophism and idealism in philosophy are it’s curse, and I’ve tried I think successfully to solve that which is why I’m no longer sure of the demarcation between philosophy, science, testimony, and law.

    As far as I know the last stronghold of philosophy was truth, and it turns out it’s a scientific discipline, and as such philosophy is now a matter of preference, good, and choice, and math, operational logic, science, economics, and law have fully separated from philosophy.

    Hopefully relegating philosophy to choice preference and good, will end it’s use for sophism.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 15:51:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73053596_142590180472477_80386154959

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/73053596_142590180472477_803861549591560192_n_142590177139144.jpg JUDITH CURRY’S GRAPH

    (via @[512155215:2048:Lisa Outhwaite])

    Lisa pointed out that the witch prosecutions occurred during periods of famine.JUDITH CURRY’S GRAPH

    (via Lisa Outhwaite)

    Lisa pointed out that the witch prosecutions occurred during periods of famine.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 10:14:00 UTC

  • “No compromise. No Debate. Those ships have sailed.”—Griff Draycott

    —“No compromise. No Debate. Those ships have sailed.”—Griff Draycott


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187119466796195841

  • CIVIL LAW WAS COMMON ACROSS EUROPE —“Originally civil law was one common legal

    CIVIL LAW WAS COMMON ACROSS EUROPE

    —“Originally civil law was one common legal system in much of Europe, but with the rise of nationalism in the 17th century Nordic countries and around… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491322538131308&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:28:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187118672864796672

  • ENGLISH COMMON LAW Common law developed after the Norman Conquest of England. In

    ENGLISH COMMON LAW

    Common law developed after the Norman Conquest of England. In 1066 England was peopled with Angles, Saxons, Vikings, Danes, Celts, Jutes, and other groups who were… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491312674798961&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:06:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187113196307566592

  • ANGLO SAXON LAW Anglo-Saxon law WRITTEN BY: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britann

    ANGLO SAXON LAW

    Anglo-Saxon law
    WRITTEN BY: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
    See Article History
    Anglo-Saxon law, the body of legal principles that prevailed in England from the 6th… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491310194799209&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:02:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187112101078323202

  • RT @TheEconomist: Economics is even less popular among girls than maths

    RT @TheEconomist: Economics is even less popular among girls than maths https://econ.st/2W2jQgP


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:36:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187105624745828355

  • “Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not h

    —“Once you understand humanity to the extent Propertarianism explains, it’s not hard to predict the broad strokes. (A key insight is understanding why the left & large segments of humanity cannot be reasoned with.)”— John Mark


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:35:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187105270763347969