Form: Quote Commentary

  • TESTIMONY (P AND CONTINGENCY) by Robert Danis What I like most about your writin

    TESTIMONY (P AND CONTINGENCY)

    by Robert Danis

    What I like most about your writings for P is that your breaking it down into the smallest possible component. Most people try to take a something as a whole and you can’t – you have to break it down into components.

    ===IMPORTANT==

    Continuous recursive disambiguation

    Convert all speech to transactions stated in a series of subjectively (humanly) testable operations.

    Meaning: first causes. 😉

    And as first causes, there are no contingent premises.

    And as non-contingent P is closed to deception by suggestion that is dependent upon ambiguity and contingency.

    This is why P defeats set logic – which is forever contingent.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:59:00 UTC

  • TESTIMONY by Robby Thorne I had given up on saving Western Civilization until I

    TESTIMONY

    by Robby Thorne

    I had given up on saving Western Civilization until I found you. Because of you, I’ve gotten off the couch, away from the TV, and spend my days coordinating 2A events. Last night while I was at work, people from our small militia, basically strong armed a small town to go 2A. Still, I had a hand in it. This morning I’m in my car in the cold, waiting to see if I have motivated people in my community to get some exercise. So rather than cuss you for putting me to work, I think you for giving me something worthwhile to do, and giving me hope for the future. You might not see the fruits of your labor, but I’m starting to pick apples here in VA. You really are my hero Curt. Have a great day my friend.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:51:00 UTC

  • DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS —“You know, P language reminds me of a di

    DOOLITTLE VS DENNETT ON CONSIOUSNESS

    —“You know, P language reminds me of a direction I think Danial Dennett was going with how to study consciousness (Phenomenology), but P is more complete. It was in his book “consciousness explained”.”— Adam Jacob Robert Walker

    Yes, well we are all subject to the same information and converging on the same solution. And I’m just the one who put it all together first.

    Probably because I started with ai, programming and economics instead of philosophy and psychology.

    So as the neurological revolution unfolded over the past twenty years I had less of a paradigm shift than the other thinkers.

    And I don’t have pressure to publish. So I just kept working without anchoring myself.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 10:36:00 UTC

  • THINKING THINGS THRU IS SCARY —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan –

    THINKING THINGS THRU IS SCARY

    —“Faith without works is dead.”—John Brennan

    —“Faith without works is free riding. It’s a crime. ;)”—Curt Doolittle

    —“Faith without works is:

    1 – Baiting into hazard for oneself in both religious and logical terms,

    2 – Making an unfalsifiable promise to the commons (i.e believe in Jesus and be saved in afterlife),

    3 – Parasitism on others within the higher-trust group of other faithful

    All of which are violations of reciprocity.

    Even though faith attempts to define reciprocity as “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” it lacks the grammar to break it down to what it really means and how to apply it.

    P. solves that problem.”—James Dmitro Makienko


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 09:24:00 UTC

  • “The West had two chances to save Russia, and ultimately the West (not counting

    —“The West had two chances to save Russia, and ultimately the West (not counting Crimean war). Simply roll in and back the White Army during the first and second Bolshevik revolutions and elminate all of them, and their families.”—James Santagata


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 22:40:00 UTC

  • “I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated

    —“I can only imagine the fallout from telling a significant other during a heated discussion that her emotions were simply a response to a perceived change in property.”—Michael Churchill


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 19:57:00 UTC

  • By Martin Štěpán Emotions are not moral or immoral, they just measure changes in

    By Martin Štěpán

    Emotions are not moral or immoral, they just measure changes in property. At most, you can say they’re bad when they’re measuring incorrectly but that’s not about morality but about the brain working sub-optimally.

    I think what might also be going on is conflation with Christian deadly sins. But these, as far as I know, are judged by actions.

    So, greed can motivate a rational agent to accumulate wealth by engaging in reciprocal exchanges where parasitism and predation are sufficiently dis-incentivized.

    Lust can motivate one deepen connection with his mate and to produce a next generation, especially, again, where the alternatives are sufficiently dis-incentivized.

    Vengeance can lead one to punish what deserves to be punished and thus dis-incentivize the recipient of vengeance from repeating it (or else removing him from the society and the gene-pool) as well as dis-incentivize other from doing the same.

    Self-deception might lead to behave in more moral ways, such as when one deceives himself that there is an afterlife and morality our actions in this life will determine whether it will be pleasurable or painful.

    Empathy can often be extended to people who deserve none or who cannot or wouldn’t reciprocate, enabling parasitism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 14:50:00 UTC

  • “People (division of labor) and prices (distribution of knowledge) have differen

    —“People (division of labor) and prices (distribution of knowledge) have different long term incentives. People have children, prices do not.”—Luke Weinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 11:39:00 UTC

  • “As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patter

    —“As economic concerns disappear in first world countries, K-select mating patterns are increasingly centered on aesthetics — for which height is a solid measure for men. Thus we already see speciation: K-select high-IQ whites with tall attractive children, and then a larger mass of the opposite. Andrew Yang talked about exactly this phenomonon in his campaign.”—Michael Churchill


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 16:11:00 UTC

  • By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog. —“today’s races are very young (outs

    By Ricardo Duchesne via MacDonald’s blog.

    —“today’s races are very young (outside Africa), and did not appear until about 12,000 to 10,000 years ago; and it may be that the European race is the youngest race, the last evolutionary stage of homo sapiens.”—

    —“According to Sandra Wilde et. al. “strong selection favoring lighter skin, hair, and eye has been operating in European populations over the last 5000 years”. In terms of these physical markers, Europeans are a very young race emerging in the course of centuries from a preceding people that were not European. This evolution, of course, was not merely about the evolution of “white” physical traits, though we should not underestimate the importance of these traits. It stands to reason that there were other key traits, including behavioral traits, which did not emerge at once but through time, which means that it is difficult to state with any definiteness when the inhabitants of Europe became “European”.”—

    —“We need to think of Europeans as a race that evolved through thousands of years inside Europe, not always gradually, but at an accelerated pace from about 10,000 years ago, in response both to the unique ecology of Europe and to their own unique cultural activities.”—

    —“Europeans were a race that evolved certain anatomical and behavioral traits by reason of breeding for thousands of years within a geographical area we call Europe. The I-Es were not a “mysterious” people who came from outside Europe but a people native to this continent. The official geographical definition of the “continent of Europe” is consistent with the cultural history of this continent in comprising “European Russia”, the Pontic Steppes located north of the Black and Caspian seas, present day Ukraine, the original homelands of the I-Es. … Other than the EFs who came from Anatolia, who already had genes for white skin, and then evolved into Europeans in Europe, there is strong genetic evidence showing that once a European race emerged out of the three populations MacDonald highlights, Europe did not experience any major genetic mixing from non-European immigrant races.”—

    —“Angles and Saxons who colonized Britain around AD 400-600 came from the Proto-Germanic Corded Ware and Bell-Beaker cultures that had melded during the Nordic Bronze Age (1730-760 BC) in Jutland, or what is present day Denmark. “—

    —“Europeans evolved in the course of time inside Europe and have remained European through almost their entire history until mass immigration came to be promoted in the last three decades.”—

    Its reversible.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 15:01:00 UTC