Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Critics Speak

    —“The view of some people against your character: Overly arrogant (narcissistic and gets very defensive when challenged); uses GRSM when speaking against it; talks about being aristocratic but is not noble (i.e 3 ex-wives, not fit, and likely not even capable of fighting a war) (hypocritical). Some people suggest your king of the hill tactics is just an excuse to use GRSM.”—

    I can see that. Also, I’m intolerant, fickle, find the populi rather vulgar, am kind but not nice, ruthless, and probably not a very good person either. Of course, none of that is a criticism of my work. It’s a demand for christian equality and subsidy of their education, not aryan aristocracy and demand for demonstration of achievement in exchange for education. 😉 Different frames are inconceivable. Nietzsche was still a christian, a continental, and a german. Aristotle wasn’t. And Odin sure wasn’t. I’ve internalized it: Religion Appeals, Law Demands.

  • Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus

    –“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble

    —“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael

    Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.

  • Aristotle Got as Close to It P as Archimedes Got to Calculus

    –“I wonder what they called P before all the great libraries were destroyed.”—Andrew Gribble

    —“I’m pretty confident that Aristotle got as close to it P as Archimedes got to calculus.”—Luan Raphael

    Archimedes: 287 BC. Epicurus 341 BC Alexander 356 BC Aristotle 384 BC When Alexander Crosses the Hellespont 334 BC, he conquered the persian empire at the expense of infecting europe with oriental despotism. We should not look at alexander as a hero, but as a fool who brings greece to an end, as napoleon that brought europe to an end. It took us until: newton-liebniz to rediscover calculus descartes to restore us to geometry (reality) Davinci to restore roman engineering It takes until the royal society before we institutionalize it again and reach greek and roman levels of schools. (1660) We don’t restore ‘physical’ thought until the industrial revolution ~1700-1830, physical thought We don’t restore administration and military order until Napoleonic France. It takes until Darwin before we reach aristotelian ‘cleanliness’ of thought. The main innovations are technological, and the main innovation in logic returning to Archimedes with Babbage by accident and Turing by design. We are, I am, still trying to restore aristotle, our original frame of european thought. I mean, realistically, the worst thing that ever happened is letting the barbarians across the hellespont. but there is no natural barrier in anatolia like there are in the caucuses to build a wall upon. so Anatolia must be lost.

  • Revolutionaries Always Look Like the Bad Guys Until….

    —“That’s also why revolutionaries always look like the bad guys until they build something better”—Micah Pezdirtz

    —“The rewards of fighting back are better than that of submission, they just dont know it yet…”–Chris Novalis

    —“Propertarianism is where the truth will lead you, if you can accept it. Unfortunately, many cannot.”—Benny Belige

    —“The gilded cage. The comfortable don’t revolt.”—Andrew Clayton That is why creating ‘discomfort’, by removing comforts, is the first step in revolution. 😉

  • Revolutionaries Always Look Like the Bad Guys Until….

    —“That’s also why revolutionaries always look like the bad guys until they build something better”—Micah Pezdirtz

    —“The rewards of fighting back are better than that of submission, they just dont know it yet…”–Chris Novalis

    —“Propertarianism is where the truth will lead you, if you can accept it. Unfortunately, many cannot.”—Benny Belige

    —“The gilded cage. The comfortable don’t revolt.”—Andrew Clayton That is why creating ‘discomfort’, by removing comforts, is the first step in revolution. 😉

  • “Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. C

    —“Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. Causing more opportunities for theft via rent seeking.”—Ryan Williams

  • “Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. C

    —“Monarchy disambiguates the oligarchy that is in charge. Republics obscure it. Causing more opportunities for theft via rent seeking.”—Ryan Williams

  • Is the Rate of Scientific Progress Slowing Down?

    Is the Rate of Scientific Progress Slowing Down? https://t.co/8i4mCkmJ2E

  • —”The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or re

    —”The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or reasonable. In short they completely lack agency, and therefore must be domesticated by any means necessary.”—-Chris M. Silbaugh

    (Quote Reposts)

  • —”The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or re

    —”The enemy does not care about being perceived as sane, cogent, rational, or reasonable. In short they completely lack agency, and therefore must be domesticated by any means necessary.”—-Chris M. Silbaugh

    (Quote Reposts)