Yes, Ann Coulter Sounds Like John Mark https://t.co/bQ6zaIlOik
Form: Quote Commentary
-
Yes, Ann Coulter Sounds Like John Mark
—“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann Coulter just a minute ago and she sounds just like John Mark. … She needs to be recruited.” — Jim
We assume she will raise the ‘call to arms’ because she is the most positioned to do so. We are gently keeping Ann ‘informed’ by arms-length distribution of information. But, we created a lot of ‘friction’ during research and development. We don’t want her tainted by association with the collateral damage of our (my) prosecutorial method of working our way through libertarianism, alt right, hard right, traditional right, religious right, and now into the mainstream. We only want her to appropriate our ideas like we want all center left, center, center-right, libertarian, traditional right, christian right, and hard right to appropriate our ideas. In other words, we want to empower Ann and others, not empower ourselves. We don’t need attention. we don’t need recognition or appreciation. We need to produce results restoring western civilization. -Curt Doolittle -The Propertarian Institute
-
Yes, Ann Coulter Sounds Like John Mark
—“Sir: I watched an interview with Ann Coulter just a minute ago and she sounds just like John Mark. … She needs to be recruited.” — Jim
We assume she will raise the ‘call to arms’ because she is the most positioned to do so. We are gently keeping Ann ‘informed’ by arms-length distribution of information. But, we created a lot of ‘friction’ during research and development. We don’t want her tainted by association with the collateral damage of our (my) prosecutorial method of working our way through libertarianism, alt right, hard right, traditional right, religious right, and now into the mainstream. We only want her to appropriate our ideas like we want all center left, center, center-right, libertarian, traditional right, christian right, and hard right to appropriate our ideas. In other words, we want to empower Ann and others, not empower ourselves. We don’t need attention. we don’t need recognition or appreciation. We need to produce results restoring western civilization. -Curt Doolittle -The Propertarian Institute
-
“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra
—“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb
-
“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra
—“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb
-
“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra
—“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb
-
“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent centra
—“The crazy notion that overlapping distributions can still have divergent central tendencies and dispersion. It’s almost as if statistical reasoning doesn’t stop at the door just because we want it to.”—Duke Newcomb
-
Reciprocity Entering the Mainstream
—“There’s that word reciprocity again… Where have I heard that before?!?”— JWarren Warren
We will get there. We will standardize that term as the central object of conflict, thereby replacing equality. We probably wont get credit for it. But we will get there. Everyone will use the term. It is the foundation of western civilization. It’s the reason for our success. Its true and it’s moral. But the harder problem in the future will be preventing the use of abrahamic deceit to undermine that term. And every time they try we will have an opportunity to train the world about abrahamic deceit ,and its cause of past present conflcit dark age, and destruction. THE BIG HISTORY IN P This is the ‘big history’ (as someone said yesterday) provided by my research into Propertarianism. It’s that the war between the masculine eugenic indo-europea, the feminine dysgenic semitic, the masculine eugenic east asian, remains with India providing the most interesting compromise position at the expense of continuous failure to evolve.
-
Reciprocity Entering the Mainstream
—“There’s that word reciprocity again… Where have I heard that before?!?”— JWarren Warren
We will get there. We will standardize that term as the central object of conflict, thereby replacing equality. We probably wont get credit for it. But we will get there. Everyone will use the term. It is the foundation of western civilization. It’s the reason for our success. Its true and it’s moral. But the harder problem in the future will be preventing the use of abrahamic deceit to undermine that term. And every time they try we will have an opportunity to train the world about abrahamic deceit ,and its cause of past present conflcit dark age, and destruction. THE BIG HISTORY IN P This is the ‘big history’ (as someone said yesterday) provided by my research into Propertarianism. It’s that the war between the masculine eugenic indo-europea, the feminine dysgenic semitic, the masculine eugenic east asian, remains with India providing the most interesting compromise position at the expense of continuous failure to evolve.
-
More Fun with Christians
—“Darwin doesn’t even agree with macro evolution. DNA, the eye, Cambrian explosion all disprove any macro evolution not to mention that species actually show just as much entropy as positive gains over time just look at how many useless dogs exist today. To pretend things get better and more organized over time is simply false.”—Charles Schiavo
Did you just try to make sense? Because you didn’t. I’m perfectly able to narrate, almost without checking first, the history of the development of the eye, in at least the two times it evolved. I don’t know how many times blood evolved but I know of two. Darwin didn’t know about DNA, but we do, that’s no argument. DNA merely explains why Darwin was right (massive parallelization, niche exploitation, favoring nothing but increased complexity. The Cambrian explosion is the result of bottlenecking, creating opportunity, increase in oxygen levels increasing available energy – particularly by increasing surface area, and the cliff effect of a new generation of genetic grammars making possible more rapid evolution. So, Energy Density > Entropy > fundamental structure(Tetrahedron?) > fundamental forces > quantum fields > particles > atoms > chemistry > biochemistry > biology > neurons > memory > sentience > consciousness > language > calculation. The same applies for the complexity of biochemical constructions, especially proteins, which function as mechanical devices at the molecular level whose changes in state are powered by changing of charges produced by attachment and detachment of molecules. So there was a Cambrian explosion just as there was a bronze age, steel age, science age, and technological age, and now computational age revolution. Just as the first generations of stars contained little, but made the higher elements, and distributed them through explosion, and laying the seeds for the development of future permutations upon those elements. In evolutionary biology this is called ‘punctuated equilibrium’ where there are periods of explosive growth due to some particular innovation. For example the Indo europeans conquered much of Eurasia in no small part because they developed the ability to drink milk, giving them 40% more calories for the same effort of production. The same for business, economic, state, and civilizational cycles. The entire universe follows the same simple rules from it’s most basic foundations through our most complex inventions. And what on earth would make you think you’re smart enough, knowledgeable enough, intellectually honest enough to make such an argument when the greatest minds of our age make the opposite.