Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch

    Sep 30, 2019, 1:53 PM

    Lisa Outhwaite: “Have you ever read The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch? It’s a reproduction of a speech supposedly given by Willie Lynch, slave-owner, around the early 1700s, in Virginia. It’s a guide on how to produce hard-working but docile slaves. Essentially he describes in detail on how to condition the female slave – it all works via the female. He would take a female slave, preferably one pregnant or with young children, and force her to watch the beating into submission of the most confident or masculine of the male slaves. The natural tendency in women to seek the most dominant protector and provider then suffers a crisis – she cannot rely on her own men for survival. This instinct for provision, that is at its most profound during pregnancy or when she has young children, is then transferred onto the slave owner. Despite his horrific abuses, he is seen as the dominant male and therefore the source of all security. The woman then is entirely submissive to him but, more importantly, she will raise all subsequent offspring to be obedient as that, to her mind at least, is the only way to secure their survival.  … The relentless ridiculing of Western men within our media works in a similar fashion. Western women have shifted loyalty over to the slave-owner – the state. She then raises her children to respect this new source of provision and protection.”

  • The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch

    Sep 30, 2019, 1:53 PM

    Lisa Outhwaite: “Have you ever read The Making Of A Slave by Willie Lynch? It’s a reproduction of a speech supposedly given by Willie Lynch, slave-owner, around the early 1700s, in Virginia. It’s a guide on how to produce hard-working but docile slaves. Essentially he describes in detail on how to condition the female slave – it all works via the female. He would take a female slave, preferably one pregnant or with young children, and force her to watch the beating into submission of the most confident or masculine of the male slaves. The natural tendency in women to seek the most dominant protector and provider then suffers a crisis – she cannot rely on her own men for survival. This instinct for provision, that is at its most profound during pregnancy or when she has young children, is then transferred onto the slave owner. Despite his horrific abuses, he is seen as the dominant male and therefore the source of all security. The woman then is entirely submissive to him but, more importantly, she will raise all subsequent offspring to be obedient as that, to her mind at least, is the only way to secure their survival.  … The relentless ridiculing of Western men within our media works in a similar fashion. Western women have shifted loyalty over to the slave-owner – the state. She then raises her children to respect this new source of provision and protection.”

  • We Are Unique

    —” We (european men) must stop making this mistake: we must stop thinking, wishing, or hoping that other groups (including our own women) are like us.”— by John Mark

    This mistake has plunged us into long dark ages before. Let’s not do it again. Let’s learn this lesson once and for all.

  • We Are Unique

    —” We (european men) must stop making this mistake: we must stop thinking, wishing, or hoping that other groups (including our own women) are like us.”— by John Mark

    This mistake has plunged us into long dark ages before. Let’s not do it again. Let’s learn this lesson once and for all.

  • Hard to Unpack but Insightful

    Hard to Unpack but Insightful https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/hard-to-unpack-but-insightful/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 23:30:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267599446306689035

  • Hard to Unpack but Insightful

    Hard to Unpack but Insightful https://t.co/otTUj6cdVF

  • Hard to Unpack but Insightful

    —“They have the moral high ground… based around defending the subjective experience of all those lower in agency. Which should be the job of high agency males, but we’ve allowed the women to believe their subjective experience is the one we live and die by. In fact, most men believe this too… more afraid of dying alone than violently.”– Benny Burke

  • Hard to Unpack but Insightful

    —“They have the moral high ground… based around defending the subjective experience of all those lower in agency. Which should be the job of high agency males, but we’ve allowed the women to believe their subjective experience is the one we live and die by. In fact, most men believe this too… more afraid of dying alone than violently.”– Benny Burke

  • Our Lack of Consumer Protection Is Criminal

    –“Quote: If FAMGA dropped off the face of the Earth, “Nearly all of your electronic devices would either stop working or would disappear, the internet would become nothing short of mass chaos, nearly all e-commerce activity would halt, and your undying thirst to watch cat videos would forever go unquenched.””—Matt Hulbert

    These companies are protected by a combination of 1) effectively unlimited access to speculative credit markets; 2) domestic intellectual property rights; 3) ability to grind the court process; 4) unconstitutional (irreciprocal) disintermediation of the public from juridical defense in matters of the commons; 5) unhealthy american habit of inaction on consumer protection; 6) the slow pace of american legal adaptation to novel monopolies (Oil, Telecom, now internet service providers); 7) And at least, recently concern that such interference cascade would expose the weakness of the economy and its dependence on debt (financialization) and a narrow distribution of tech companies whose assets are being duplicated in china where none of these american ‘issues’ are a problem. I’m a conservative libertarian but our lack of consumer protection is criminal – tech is just obvious. Credit is even more criminal. I’ve lived in a very poor country (Ukraine) born costs in many, and there is no reason for most of the absurd costs we pay for what have converted from luxuries to infrastructure. Google is the national resource location platform, amazon the national shopping and delivery platform, and Facebook the national communication platform.

  • Our Lack of Consumer Protection Is Criminal

    –“Quote: If FAMGA dropped off the face of the Earth, “Nearly all of your electronic devices would either stop working or would disappear, the internet would become nothing short of mass chaos, nearly all e-commerce activity would halt, and your undying thirst to watch cat videos would forever go unquenched.””—Matt Hulbert

    These companies are protected by a combination of 1) effectively unlimited access to speculative credit markets; 2) domestic intellectual property rights; 3) ability to grind the court process; 4) unconstitutional (irreciprocal) disintermediation of the public from juridical defense in matters of the commons; 5) unhealthy american habit of inaction on consumer protection; 6) the slow pace of american legal adaptation to novel monopolies (Oil, Telecom, now internet service providers); 7) And at least, recently concern that such interference cascade would expose the weakness of the economy and its dependence on debt (financialization) and a narrow distribution of tech companies whose assets are being duplicated in china where none of these american ‘issues’ are a problem. I’m a conservative libertarian but our lack of consumer protection is criminal – tech is just obvious. Credit is even more criminal. I’ve lived in a very poor country (Ukraine) born costs in many, and there is no reason for most of the absurd costs we pay for what have converted from luxuries to infrastructure. Google is the national resource location platform, amazon the national shopping and delivery platform, and Facebook the national communication platform.