RT @elonmusk: If you don’t think there’s at least a tiny chance you’re an NPC … you’re an NPC
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-31 13:21:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1609178001375383552
RT @elonmusk: If you don’t think there’s at least a tiny chance you’re an NPC … you’re an NPC
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-31 13:21:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1609178001375383552
RT @ContraFabianist: @WalterIII One cannot conserve second-order civilizational capital in a condition where the first-order capital it is…
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-31 03:58:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1609036180330512385
RT @ContraFabianist:
One who is opposed in action, word, and deed to the incremental strategies of civilizational warfare waged upon the West.
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-31 03:58:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1609036148717899776
–“no matter how many writs of mandamus the Court produces—going against the will of the president—and no matter how many warrants the Court writes up for arrest of the President, these are next to meaningless in the face of a president who chooses not to cooperate.”–
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-29 21:34:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608577204304187392
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608574398675709952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
AFAIK a state can only violate a judgment of the supreme court if it is beyond their constitutional authority. Their constitutional authority is outlined in the constitution, bill of rights, and amendments. Among those is the right to bear arms.
What happens then when states do?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1608574398675709952
-“A federal judge orders compliance with a Writ of Mandamus. If the official served the writ refuses to comply, he can be held in jail for contempt until he agrees to comply. If met with resistance, Federal Marshals, National Guard, or Troops may be sent in to force compliance.”-
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-29 21:28:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608575636439982080
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608574398675709952
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
AFAIK a state can only violate a judgment of the supreme court if it is beyond their constitutional authority. Their constitutional authority is outlined in the constitution, bill of rights, and amendments. Among those is the right to bear arms.
What happens then when states do?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1608574398675709952
Rees Mogg for Tory Leader?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ol_x-63WvU
OMG a smart person in a political position? Is that still possible?
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-29 19:01:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608538678032228353

RT @Peter_Turchin: And elite overproduction strikes again… https://t.co/fyJzr7EAOT

Source date (UTC): 2022-12-29 18:18:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608527812465508357
–“The facts of the world won’t stick with her. There’s no world model. Only a social one.”– Michael
I frame it as emotional/social consistency vs systematizing/physical consistency. But I love the simplicity of:”There is no world(physical) model, only a social(emotional) one.”
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-29 17:28:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1608515307982692358
-“I’m unsure the Christians aren’t talking themselves INTO the apocalypse.”– Brandon Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-27 17:07:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1607785312435986432
–“We don’t wanna do that crashy thing.”– Brandon Hayes
(Referring to how much no one wants to crash their civilization).
Source date (UTC): 2022-12-27 17:07:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1607785166637858825