http://www.businesspundit.com/iphone-costs/THE ACTUAL COST OF AN IPHONE 4s
(Of course the argument being made is that we should make them in the states rather than in china. And that’s not going to happen.)
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-30 10:17:00 UTC
http://www.businesspundit.com/iphone-costs/THE ACTUAL COST OF AN IPHONE 4s
(Of course the argument being made is that we should make them in the states rather than in china. And that’s not going to happen.)
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-30 10:17:00 UTC
http://modeledbehavior.com/2012/04/21/the-future-is-not-what-you-want/Adam Ozimek Suggests The Future Will Include More Time In Front Of The Television. đ
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-21 20:43:00 UTC
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/test-scores-and-housing-costs/ITS THE QUALITY OF THE PEOPLE NOT THE QUALITY OF THE SCHOOL
–The Best Ideas Are Always In The Comments–
“the reality of the situation….is it’s the quality of the people who comprise the neighborhood that dictate the quality of the school. Being wealthy is a by-product of the quality of those people. The culture and values of the individual, family and neighborhood matter. The most successful ethnic group in America are Asian-Americans. Why? Confucian-based values, a strong emphasis on family, and a strong work ethic create the environment necessary to raise the next generation of successful individuals. The poor are a by-product of poor individual choices, broken families, and a lack of focus on what is truly important: education.”
Now, lets understand that white, ashkenazi and east asian scores are superior in each area. But that we’re also less impulsive — calmer. Unfortunately, white IQ has declined in the aggregate since 1850 due to rapid breeding by the underclasses. Is that offensive? Maybe. But if you pursue equality with unequal people you’re just tilting at windmills. Lets not blame the schools for the quality of the students. The only blame the schools carry is tenured teachers that the principles can’t fire.
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-20 08:21:00 UTC
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/young-women-are-more-career-driven-than-men-now/IT’S NOT A CHANGE IN WOMEN, IT’S THE ECONOMY STUPID
We need to get these men working. That’s what the numbers say.
The survey results are an aggregate numerical effect, not one that belies any change in male preferences or behavior.
Factors:
a) wider distribution of male abilities than female abilities means the lower part of society is male, plus males are disproportionately affected by the ongoing ‘Man-recession’.
b) fewer men going to college
c) lower male workforce participation rate
d) ongoing effect of the recession
e) the tendency of men to state what is possible as a preference.
f) the fact that males mentally mature more slowly due to how we enforce education today.
Basically:
1) the lower quintiles of males affect the aggregates.
2) The abandonment of the workforce by increasing numbers of men below 30 and above 52.
3) The remaining mailes can’t compensate for the other two groups.
We are not going to have the wonderful world everyone imagined post 1950. The lower classes are abandoning the institutions that made us a ‘society’. Marriage, and the nuclear family will be signals of wealth. And wealth is uncommon. Males will do here, what they have done in the rest of the world when they are no longer bound by marriage.
That’s what they’re doing. That’s what we’re seeing. It’s just data.
Does it matter?
Unemployed disenfranchised women don’t really matter to a polity. Unemployed disenfranchised men create an infinite number of problems. Not the least of which is that they’re a precondition for revolution.
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-20 07:37:00 UTC
On interfuidity, Steve Randy Waldman writes:
We are in a depression, but not because we donât know how to remedy the problem. We are in a depression because it is our revealed preference, as a polity, not to remedy the problem. We are choosing continued depression because we prefer it to the alternatives.
That’s true. We are in a depression because further empowering the state to interfere in our lives is a higher cost than weathering the depression. And it is CHEAPER to disempower the state now, than it would be by alternative, more physical means. A depression that deprives the state of power, is a cheap way of buying freedom. Usually we have to risk our lives, not our pocketbooks.
On interfuidity, Steve Randy Waldman writes:
We are in a depression, but not because we donât know how to remedy the problem. We are in a depression because it is our revealed preference, as a polity, not to remedy the problem. We are choosing continued depression because we prefer it to the alternatives.
That’s true. We are in a depression because further empowering the state to interfere in our lives is a higher cost than weathering the depression. And it is CHEAPER to disempower the state now, than it would be by alternative, more physical means. A depression that deprives the state of power, is a cheap way of buying freedom. Usually we have to risk our lives, not our pocketbooks.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/04/catholic_versus.html#.T40iIE_Z7Ak.facebookCATHOLIC VERSUS PROTESTANT ETHICS
“The “Catholic” approach has extremely high moral standards but enforces them loosely.
The “Protestant” approach has moderate moral standards, but enforces them strictly.”
IMHO: Protestant ethics are concerned with the actions and results needed to produce good works, catholic ethics are concerned with symbols and beliefs in order to create internal purity. Thats why all the entrepreneurs are protestant, and so many philosophers are catholic.
Small things in large numbers have vast consequences.
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-17 04:01:00 UTC
http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/economics/aggregated-confusionAUSTRIAN ECONOMICS “IS HOW ECONOMICS SHOULD BE DONE”
But then, assuming the state will continue to pursue opportunities to increase taxes and decrease unemployment, the austrian approach would put the state in the position of trying to affect change via industrial policy. Meaning, being in bed with industries and unions.
Maybe that isn’t all bad. It’s certainly better than being in bed with the financial sector.
But then the state will always be in bed with someone.
It needs someone to F***.
(Apologies if light guttural humor is over the top. It was just THERE and I had to take it.)
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-16 16:43:00 UTC
http://mises.org/daily/5947/The-Fall-of-Communism-in-MassachusettsWORTH SHARING: MAYFLOWER COMMUNISM. COMMUNISM=DEATH.
I’m glad my ancestors survived.. by coming to New Haven not Plymouth.
Source date (UTC): 2012-04-12 08:52:00 UTC
Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste an article, Taki’s Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don’t get paid for their work. Email editors@takimag.com to buy additional rights. http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire/print#ixzz1rfleMaea