RT @WerrellBradley: THE OPERATING SYSTEM OF SUBVERSION
1. Control the money supply. Cash = (sounds like “CASH” in Hebrew) “As Fire.”
2.…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 23:42:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745592115063579013
RT @WerrellBradley: THE OPERATING SYSTEM OF SUBVERSION
1. Control the money supply. Cash = (sounds like “CASH” in Hebrew) “As Fire.”
2.…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 23:42:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745592115063579013
RT @elonmusk: Cis is a heterophobic word. Shame on anyone who uses it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 23:42:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745592068519440673
ISLAMIC LAW HELD BACK THE MIDDLE EAST – BUT THE FAILURE OF WESTERN LAW MADE US VULNERABLE
—“During the period of interest, an institution of great importance to Middle Eastern daily life was the holy la w of Islam (shari’a), also known as Islamic law.
In principle, Islamic law covered all human activity. As a matter of practice, certain spheres of life were governed by rules divorced from religious considerations. In the politica! discourse of the Ottoman Empire (1299-1922) there was even a category of laws known as “ruler’s la w” (kanun), as distinct from Islamic law, and also a third category, customary law (orf), which rested on precedent rather than religious scripture or learning.
In commerce and finance, two areas in which the Middle East fell conspicuously behind, right up to modern times Islamic law played a key role. People entered into contracts that followed an Islamic template and were enforced through Islamic courts. They apportioned estates according to Islamic inheritance rules. Residents of the region’s great cities obtained services mostly from waqfs, which were trusts formed under Islamic law and supervised by officials with religious training. Almost alllawsuits involving at least one Muslim were litigated by Muslirh judges, under Islamic legal principles.”–
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 19:20:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745526186233507840
LAW MATTERS MORE – MUSLIM FAILURE DUE TO MUSLIM LAW
–“… [Asking] why the modern economy took shape in northwestern Europe and not the eastern Mediterranean, the typical answer would contrast western flexibility with Muslim rigidity. Through the Reformation, the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment, many would say, western Christendom liberated itself from Church dogma and gave free rein to creativity. For its part, the Islamic world failed to free itself from the fetters of religious custom. Islam opposes innovation, it is often claimed, so Muslim social structures resisted adaptation and advancement.”–
However, it was the religion and the custom that prevented the reformation of hte law – and as I have written extensively, it is the demographics that generate the need for that custom and religoin that in turn generate ignorance and stagnation, that in turn generated the inability to modify the law.
Islam like Judaism claims monopoly and finality that no other religions and cultures do -and this monopoly and finality is the reason both for the diasporic prosecution of the jews, and the civilizational failures of islam.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 18:45:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745517401267937280
The Biden administration and the FED are misleading you with fake number… https://youtu.be/5GxTSl_E8oU?si=RZIUs-8OxGsPi7k7 via @YouTube
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 13:21:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745435675346796938
RT @LukeWeinhagen: The dysfunctional placeholder aristocracy of today fears the rise of a healthy and functional aristocracy.
‘Certain “el…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 13:18:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745435073988395342
RT @LukeWeinhagen: My ideal for social organization maximizes self-determination within the limits of natural law. Expressed as responsibil…
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 13:18:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745435031382765866
–“If we instead recognize that the fundamental political issue is that of responsibility,”– Luke Weinhagen https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1745228306620805267
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:03:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745295288720322875
https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1745228306620805267
–“If we instead recognize that the fundamental political issue is that of responsibility,”– Luke Weinhagen
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:03:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745295288674160640
ANGLO NATURAL COMMON LAW VS EVERYONE ELSE – (ESPECIALLLY YOU KNOW WHO
–“Among contemporary common-law legal practitioners and Anglophone legal philosophers, “natural law” often simply refers to any approach that treats law as necessarily having a connection to morality.
This meaning is essentially the converse of “legal positivism,” which is often defined, minimally, as the contention that law has no necessary connection with morality.”–
So there exist those of us who hold to the rule that if it is not moral it is not law as we may not be bound to that which is not moral. And there exist those of us who hold that morality does not exist, or is not relevant to the law, and as such law is whatever they say it is. WHne in practice they mean only that a law must be produced by some pretense of legitimacy, not that it must be moral.
This is of course, because they have no means of judging what is moral -for reasons I’ve explained exhaustively elsewhere.
The purpose of my work, is, in part, to produce a science of morality so that we can render attempts at positive law illegal even to propose.
Cheers
CD
PS: In my world it’s smart and moral people vs dim and immoral peole but, hey…. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:03:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745286965396639744