Form: Quote Commentary

  • RT @StevePender: @curtdoolittle There’s increasing disagreement over what should

    RT @StevePender: @curtdoolittle There’s increasing disagreement over what should be defended vs what should be prohibited, which should be…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-09 16:31:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755992772530647109

  • SOUTHERN CULTURE: THE (LAZY) BEHAVIOR OF WHITES LEADS TO THE BEHAVIOR OF BLACKS?

    SOUTHERN CULTURE: THE (LAZY) BEHAVIOR OF WHITES LEADS TO THE BEHAVIOR OF BLACKS?
    Thomas Sowell Doing His Usual Best.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzsY0qlsRgg
    (The economics of the behavior of the celtic fringe)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-08 16:23:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755628453846512198

  • AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY

    AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY 😉

    Summarizing Doolittle’s Style
    In summarizing Doolittle’s style, it’s clear that his work calls for a deeper societal commitment to the responsible stewardship of all forms of capital, especially those behavioral norms that underlie the trust and reciprocity necessary for a society to thrive.

    Advocacy for Responsibility over Capital
    Doolittle’s discourse centers on the stewardship of capital in its myriad forms, extending beyond mere physical assets to include what Friedrich Hayek referred to as “the extended order” — a network of traditions, norms, and behaviors that enable a society to function and flourish. Doolittle extends this notion to advocate for a vigilant guardianship over both private and common capital, emphasizing the role of behavioral capital like truthfulness, trust, and the maintenance of reciprocal relations in society.

    Emphasis on Behavioral Capital and High Trust
    A significant aspect of Doolittle’s work is his focus on the intangible yet crucial capital of behavior, particularly the norms and practices that engender a high-trust society. He argues for a “radical demand for individual responsibility” to suppress and prevent irreciprocity. This perspective underscores the belief that societal health and prosperity are contingent upon each member’s commitment to honesty, trustworthiness, and the enforcement of reciprocal behaviors.

    Interdisciplinary Integration
    Understanding Doolittle’s work requires an appreciation of how he weaves together insights from economics, law, psychology, and evolutionary theory to build his arguments. His interdisciplinary approach provides a comprehensive lens through which to view the complexities of societal interaction and governance, always with an eye towards the preservation and enhancement of societal capital.

    Logical Rigor and Empirical Foundation
    Doolittle employs a methodical and logical approach to argue for the necessity of maintaining and protecting societal capital. His arguments are grounded in empirical evidence and historical analysis, demonstrating how societies that foster high levels of trust and individual responsibility tend to achieve greater prosperity and stability.

    Provocative and Confrontational Style
    In advocating for these principles, Doolittle often adopts a provocative and confrontational tone, challenging readers to reconsider accepted norms and to recognize the often invisible forms of capital that are crucial for societal success. His style is intended to stimulate thought, debate, and, ultimately, action towards the preservation of societal capital.

    Commitment to Societal Reform
    Doolittle’s work is not just analytical but also prescriptive, offering a vision for societal reform that emphasizes the enhancement of trust, truthfulness, and reciprocity. He calls for systemic changes that ensure individuals and institutions are held accountable for their contributions to or detractions from the societal capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 22:27:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755357544816459776

  • “according to layoffs . fyi, over 33,000 tech workers have lost their jobs in 20

    –“according to layoffs . fyi, over 33,000 tech workers have lost their jobs in 2024 already,”–

    LIke I said a few days ago. The government’s employment numbers are pure statistical fiction fearing that the public will recognize the state of the economy is as bad as they intuit it is, and that this will (as it should) result in election differences. Particularly because a Trump economy is a good economy.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 18:10:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755293055588917248

  • HOW XI DESTROYED CHINESE POLITICS (Worth The Watch – Faux Emperors and Empires L

    HOW XI DESTROYED CHINESE POLITICS
    (Worth The Watch – Faux Emperors and Empires Last Ghasp)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7exXFSj8mc


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-06 14:38:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754877329245962477

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @unnnnnggghh @thelampmagazine @herandrews —“Human rights te

    RT @curtdoolittle: @unnnnnggghh @thelampmagazine @herandrews —“Human rights tends to advance alongside American capitalism, … To any wo…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-05 23:32:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754649118733951001

  • “Human rights tends to advance alongside American capitalism, … To any world l

    —“Human rights tends to advance alongside American capitalism, … To any world leader concerned about protecting his country’s sovereignty, it is evidence that human rights is, often as not, a stalking horse for American power.”— From Chris Caldwell

    I think Chris is (and you are) mistaken – sort of.

    Yes, the postwar strategy of the west was (a) to prohibit border conflicts, (b) by directing states to the economic modernization of their populations rather than military expansion (Human Rights) (c) to create free trade despite doing so at the american populations cost and quality of life, (d) and to complete ending of the age of agrarian empires, which is the reason for the world wars, (e) bringing about the era of industrial nation states, free trade, and the resulting world prosperity.

    This is how rule of law and the ‘Smithian’ prosperity is created as well as the reluctance of states dependent upon one another for economic cooperation to war.

    However, the i) definition of human rights was insufficiently articulated, ii) the communists forced the introduction of the last two (or three?) into the enumerated rights that are not possible to be human rights, and iii) this failure opened the door to ‘expanding’ necessary rights (Natural Human Rights) into ‘unnatural’ and therefore seditious claims to such false rights.

    As such it is unwise to claim the problem of human rights, meaning natural rights, all of which are purely cooperative to economic in their purpose, is the problem rather than , as usual, the sedition by the left that has, as it always does, undermined the elegance of the strategy by abuse of it and inserting their seditious, corrupting, immoral perversion on top of it/

    Affections.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @unnnnnggghh @thelampmagazine @herandrews


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-05 23:31:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754649093022875648

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754614749684219921

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @taiwtaiwb8 @BalThomass @Culture_Crit –“If you removed black

    RT @curtdoolittle: @taiwtaiwb8 @BalThomass @Culture_Crit –“If you removed black crime, the US was tied for second as safest country in the…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-05 23:21:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754646526255641023

  • “If you removed black crime, the US was tied for second as safest country in the

    –“If you removed black crime, the US was tied for second as safest country in the world for violent crime. Tied with or behind either Japan and one of the Nordic countries”–

    That is correct. We do not have a violence or crime problem we have a black problem. We do not have civilizational problem we have a women problem. We do not have a low wage problem, we have an offshoring and underclass immigration problem. The only problem then is men not continuing to take responsibility for holding the state and the institutions accountable for the destruction of capital.
    We should never assume that what is wrong with the dysfunctional margins as a core incompetency of the civilization, country, or state. It’s merely a side effect of ‘too much democracy’ producing ‘too much tolerance’ intead of defense of private and common capital both biological, physical, and behavioral.

    Reply addressees: @taiwtaiwb8 @BalThomass @Culture_Crit


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-05 23:21:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754646496379535360

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754635545261858907

  • HOW BIDEN ADMIN IS LYING ABOUT EMPLOYMENT

    HOW BIDEN ADMIN IS LYING ABOUT EMPLOYMENT
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYdfABaX-RU


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-05 14:17:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1754509459395625464