Form: Quote Commentary

  • “The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failur

    —“The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failure of the communist East to build a better world, as evidenced by their brutal expansionism and mass slaughters of civilians. They also realized that the West was moving further and further away from appropriating Marx’s doctrines, so they started to concoct new plans. Just as Mao replaced Marx’s concept of the proletariat (trained factory workers) with the masses of unskilled survival farmers, the neo-Marxists foresaw that the Western “proletariat” would never go that route. Hence they started pushing the idea of the revolutionary potential of ALL MINORITY FRINGE GROUPS, such as the Unskilled Third World masses, the feminists and gender benders, the SJW, and lately also the BLM’s and others. They set up the dialectics in such a way that there is one core enemy: whites (esp attacking the traditional concepts of masculinity and feminity). What whites must learn if they are to survive, is that the debate about white survival has been put on the table by people with only one purpose in mind: destruction. The Muslim masses have come to play a central role in this. The core lessons are that these radicals should not be allowed to debate it (well they don’t really debate but shout and cry), and also that the ballot is NOT the forum to decide this.”—Tobie Louw


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 14:29:00 UTC

  • Christianity isn’t so much “reformed”, as is it has been “defanged”.— Anon Chr

    —Christianity isn’t so much “reformed”, as is it has been “defanged”.— Anon

    Christianity was a weapon which justified aryanism. The world wars ended our comfort with aryanism. we need restore aryanism. Christianity on the other hand is a good cult-of-the-feminine. But without arianism – the aristocracy – it is but a cancer on mankind like all abrahamic religions. Because it mutates like judaism and islam into marxism. Or perhaps better said, judaism, islamism and christianity without aristocracy are all attempts at marxism.

    There can be no church without aristocracy.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 09:25:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON RAND AND OBJECTIVISM?” —“I would love to find out yo

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/the-final-word-on-rand-and-objectivism/”Q&A: WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON RAND AND OBJECTIVISM?”

    —“I would love to find out your thoughts on Objectivism? Have you written about it in the past?”—A Friend

    if you are a young male and you do not read rand’s novels you are missing out. Rand is a doorway to philosophy for those who must enter it by means of fictional narrative. And in that function she does well. But it is a children’s book – so to speak- level of discourse on philosophy, just as philosophy proper is a young adult’s discourse on law, science, and history.

    Young men are ambitious but weak and lacking resources and alliances. Rand provides a literary philosophy for the ambitious but weak who lack alliances and resources. However, the strong are strong because of numbers, and rand like all semites cannot seem to envision or comprehend the commons that numbers can produce.

    And the commons is the means by which the west defeated the rest: we can produce them. Almost no one else can.

    So, read her novels when young, and move on. Only silly people are attracted to Objectivism. If you understand Rothbard, then hoppe, the me (or jump right to propertarianism) you will see the evolution of Rand’s childishness and jewish lower class philosophy, through Hoppe’s german middle class philosophy, to my anglo aristocratic class philosophy. And then realize that they were weak and making excuses. I describe defacto how the west outraced the rest.

    Use violence to Rule and possess sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy, or choose not to, and be ruled by those who deprive you of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and subsidy.

    Aristocracy: the organized use of violence to produce sovereignty by denying all others any alternative.

    in other words: natural law.

    SELFISHNESS IS A PLAY ON WORDS

    https://propertarianism.com/2011/04/14/ayn-rands-selfishness-is-a-play-on-words-in-order-to-hook-your-attention/

    FINAL WORD ON RAND AND OBJECTIVISM

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/02/20/the-final-word-on-rand-and-objectivism/

    HOW TO LEARN PHILOSOPHY (the science of choice)

    https://propertarianism.com/2015/08/07/q-how-do-i-learn-philosophy/


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 17:20:00 UTC

  • ROME FELL FROM WITHIN —“You also seem to be under the false impression that th

    ROME FELL FROM WITHIN

    —“You also seem to be under the false impression that the ‘Barbarians’ destroyed Rome. Not really true – Rome destroyed itself from within – much as the Soviet Union did. The Germanics just picked up the pieces.”— Aaron Kahland


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 14:25:00 UTC

  • NOT AN EBOOK BUT PRETTY CLOSE: —“Curt: Do you have an e book out yet?”— The

    https://propertarianism.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/PROPERTARIANISM: NOT AN EBOOK BUT PRETTY CLOSE:

    —“Curt: Do you have an e book out yet?”—

    The idea of an ebook kind of bothers me. I don’t know why I would do that. But if you want the equivalent it’s up on the site.

    That is current thru last fall. At present I’m still working on synthesis ( making it all a little easier to understand), and on completing the work on the formal logic, so that isn’t all in there. But most of the major concepts are in there already.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 14:24:00 UTC

  • “ISIS is left-wing, because they have a stated egalitarian ideology that views a

    —“ISIS is left-wing, because they have a stated egalitarian ideology that views all races as equal and lay a universal claim to political authority, believing that all cultures and governments not subservient to the Islamic State are illegitimate and hence rightful for ISIS to conquer”—Amr Ibn Hisham

    Yes. Test?

    r/left/universal/dysgenic VERSUS k/right/particular/eugenic


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 10:01:00 UTC

  • PURITANISM: A SIGNAL BEAST THAT CANNOT BE SATED —“Puritans are religious fanat

    PURITANISM: A SIGNAL BEAST THAT CANNOT BE SATED

    —“Puritans are religious fanatics that only feed on ignoble utopianism. Throughout history they’ve adopted many causes, none noble. It began with their radicalization in England, and throughout history took on new manifestations once hitting New World shores like collectivism, anti-monarchsm, millenialism, radical abolitionism, universal suffrage, prohibitionism, democratic crusades, etc etc… a beast that cannot be satiated. “—Aaron Kahland


    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 04:27:00 UTC

  • Some Quotes

    Explaining the Church of TED to a college student:  “It’s Oprah for the over-educated classes”. —“Women are hypergamous… Government is the biggest resource and thus the handsomest.”—Anne Tripp   —“Any pretense of humanity having diverged from its most reliable and durable political system (monarchy) is just another load of bullshit virtue signaling. Our kings elect our presidents. We’re just the upscale peasants that think we had a say in the matter.”— Emil Prelic —“Universalism – Proof that “some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could believe them”–Julian le Roux —“There is no greater decadence than virtue signalling against those less fortunate than you.”—Julian le Roux —“As I understand it Curt focuses on building a grammar from the ground up, as it were. Operational grammar staves off assumptions about the ends and emphasises inquiry into the means.”— Nicholas Arthur Catton (I’m glad smart people follow me ’cause I can’t say some of this stuff as smartly as they do.

  • Some Quotes

    Explaining the Church of TED to a college student:  “It’s Oprah for the over-educated classes”. —“Women are hypergamous… Government is the biggest resource and thus the handsomest.”—Anne Tripp   —“Any pretense of humanity having diverged from its most reliable and durable political system (monarchy) is just another load of bullshit virtue signaling. Our kings elect our presidents. We’re just the upscale peasants that think we had a say in the matter.”— Emil Prelic —“Universalism – Proof that “some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could believe them”–Julian le Roux —“There is no greater decadence than virtue signalling against those less fortunate than you.”—Julian le Roux —“As I understand it Curt focuses on building a grammar from the ground up, as it were. Operational grammar staves off assumptions about the ends and emphasises inquiry into the means.”— Nicholas Arthur Catton (I’m glad smart people follow me ’cause I can’t say some of this stuff as smartly as they do.

  • Quote of the Year.

    —“Our generation will sacrifice ourselves for our posterity, rather than sacrifice our posterity for ourselves.”—Karl Grohe Hang the boomers.  Noose Pike and Pyre.  We will make the french, bolsheviks, and the brown shirts look like school girls.