Form: Quote Commentary

  • CULL THE WEAK OF CHARACTER by Daniel Gurpide I think Curt SHOULD also slaughter

    CULL THE WEAK OF CHARACTER

    by Daniel Gurpide

    I think Curt SHOULD also slaughter the sacred cows of Ariosophists, Traditionalists (with capital “T”) and the rest of that motley crew.

    Evola, for example, a third rate “philosopher” in the 20s and 30s, was brought back to life after world war II by the eternal losers: all those nostalgic Fascists and co. who thought they were winning the war – now in another reality dimension: their own delusional ‘phantasy’ world.

    In Evola, Guenon (even worse) and Heidegger (slightly better) there’s nothing but occultism, obfuscation, denial of reality, inferiority complex, biological and intellectual barrenness, impotence (mental and sexual).

    (CD: well that was pretty clear 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 14:34:00 UTC

  • “We have limited cognitive information processing capacity: shall we optimize fo

    —“We have limited cognitive information processing capacity: shall we optimize for fitness or shall we optimize for truth?”— Herbert Vogelsang

    he presupposition there is that truth and fitness are not identically competitive propositions.

    I think, instead, that men are unequal and we must use the tools of cognition availble to each. If men are subhuman we must understand that they can only comprehend framing for the subhuman. If men are transcendent from the beast and fully human, then they can comprehend framing by the truth.

    So what your question implies (besides an unnecessary dichotomy) is whether we should choose the least common denominator, or as I recommend, choose the hightest possibleddenominator and heremly humor and manage those that remain.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 07:15:00 UTC

  • by Morgan Warstler Moldbug and reactionaries don’t stare into the abyss. Human d

    by Morgan Warstler

    Moldbug and reactionaries don’t stare into the abyss. Human domination is not cultural. It is value driven. There are big dumb guys and smart little guys and the guy who can muster the big dumb guys is the one who can drive the most ROI VALUE out of the rest, by organizing them to his plan. As such value creators are judged by the only true god, the market. Xianty & Western Civ WON bc it best approximated Capitalism. Most of 10 commandments are basically valorizing property rights and servicing “god” (the market). Cultures then / States – are ALWAYS controlled by VALUE CREATORS. Cuba, Russia, US, France – the smart guys best able to drive ROI are the NORMATIVE HEGEMONY. In any system, the same guys win. Reread that. HOWEVER, in each system, based on history, geography, natural resources, and on and on, the Value creators establish states and then states (controlled ALWAYS by the value creating crowd underneath COMPETE. The logical contraction of Rx guys? THEY ARE NOT THE VALUE CREATORS, they are guys who want to have power bc they GREW UP IN the winningest state. Describing the problem does not create value. In real terms this means: NOBODY BUT GOD KING ENTREPRENEURS get to decide the value of man. He can be black, Chinese, white – the ONLY and FINAL say of that mans worth? The value creator who says, I CAN MAKE $2/hr ROI and keep him sated.” There is no state, no culture, no gelatinous tribe that that CAN OVERRULE one value creator who says, this man is profitable to me. Said simply: RX fails bc it doesn’t know it is my tribe’s bitch. And push comes shove, we’ll remove them from the gene pool.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-26 00:07:00 UTC

  • SPENGLER: “ANGLOS ARE ESSENTIALLY VIKING PIRATES” Spengler: Liberalism works for

    SPENGLER: “ANGLOS ARE ESSENTIALLY VIKING PIRATES”

    Spengler: Liberalism works for the English because they are essentially Viking pirates

    —“England did away with the principle of the organized state, and put in its place the notion of the free private citizen.

    The citizen demands permission to fight alone in the ruthless struggle for existence, for this is the only way he can satisfy his Viking instincts.

    Buckle, Malthus, and Darwin later postulated that the basic essence of “society” was the naked struggle for existence. And they were absolutely right, at least as far as their own country and people were concerned.

    To be sure, in modern England this principle operates in a highly refined and perfected fashion.

    But evidence of a more rudimentary adherence to it can be found in the Icelandic sagas, where such behavior is obviously spontaneous and not borrowed from another culture.

    The forces with which William the Conqueror took England in 1066 could be called a “society” of knightly adventurers, and English trading companies have subdued and expropriated entire countries—most recently, since 1390, the inland regions of South Africa. Gradually the entire English nation assumed the characteristics of a “society.”

    The Old Norse instinct for piracy and clever trading has, in the end. influenced the Englishman’s attitude toward all of reality, including property, work, foreign peoples, and the weaker individuals and classes among his own people. The same instinct has also yielded political techniques that are extremely effective weapons in the struggle for mastery of the globe.

    A concept complementary to that of “society” is the “private citizen.” He represents the sum of certain positive ethical qualities which like all great. ethical virtues are not acquired through training or education, but are borne in the blood and perfected after “passing through generation after generation.

    The peculiarly English style of politics is essentially one that involves private citizens or groups of such individuals. This, and only this, is the very meaning of parliamentary government.

    Cecil Rhodes was a private citizen who conquered foreign countries. The American billionaires are private citizens who rule foreign countries by means of an inferior class of professional politicians.

    German liberalism, on the other hand, is ethically valueless. It merely says “No!” to the state, and is unable to justify its opposition by offering equally high-minded and vigorous positive- suggestions.”— Spengler

    ( via Rorik Svalbard )


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 18:39:00 UTC

  • Facts about (Facebook) friends by Tyler Cowen 1. For the population of the avera

    Facts about (Facebook) friends

    by Tyler Cowen

    1. For the population of the average county, 62.8% of FB friends live within 100 miles.

    2. Over distances of less than 200 miles, the elasticity of friends to distance is about – 2.0, and about – 1.2 for distances greater than 200 miles.

    3. Conditional on distance, social connectedness is significantly stronger within state lines.

    4. “Counties with a higher social capital index have less geographically concentrated social networks.”

    5. Social connectedness predicts trade flows, even after controlling for distance, and it also predicts patent citations.

    That is all from a new NBER working paper by Bailey, Cao, Kuchler, Stroebel, and Wong. Here is an ungated version.

    (CURT: Not true for me at all.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-25 07:24:00 UTC

  • “Reading Curt’s posts has probably kept me out of a certain amount of trouble –

    —“Reading Curt’s posts has probably kept me out of a certain amount of trouble – but sometimes my wife is annoyed when I read them to her.”— Diarmuid O’Donnegan

    (you aren’t supposed to talk about fight club with wives. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 18:28:00 UTC

  • THREE QUESTIONS ON MY OWN CONVERSION —“Hi Curt. I’ve been following you for a

    THREE QUESTIONS ON MY OWN CONVERSION

    —“Hi Curt. I’ve been following you for a long time. Your radical ideas inspired me to change my own life. I wanted to tell you I think you’re probably one of if not the best voices out there for young men. I was wondering what inspired your change from a more libertarian scientific worldview to a much more revolutionary pagan worldview like you have now.”— Dagon

    Well you know, this kind of thing matters to me a lot. It always makes my day. And If I can help young men then that is as good or better as being remembered in the history of thought.

    You’re giving me a great opportunity to talk in personal rather than analytic terms. So thank you for the questions.

    I’m going to break this up into three separate posts.

    See those that follow.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 13:39:00 UTC

  • “Lets face it, underclass fathers dont stick around, and are not monogamous gene

    —“Lets face it, underclass fathers dont stick around, and are not monogamous generally, and not reliably employed so they require maintenance from the females of the species for lodging. The female is less violent and given access to state resources and benefits. The financial capacity of the community is dictated externally and distributed through underclass females so the selection criteria for mating is not determined by a mate’s economic value but by other criteria, education not one of them.”— anon


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-23 10:24:00 UTC

  • London school: statistical management of estates scaled too fast to be governed

    London school: statistical management of estates scaled too fast to be governed by natural law.– Josh Jeppson


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-22 11:27:00 UTC

  • by Daniel Gurpide Scientific and technological developments undermined belief in

    by Daniel Gurpide

    Scientific and technological developments undermined belief in the existence of God. Already in the eighteenth century the idea of intellectually proving the existence of God was abandoned, and Rousseau and Kant may be found positing a belief in God based instead on emotions or values. In a culture in which God had died owing to the development of science, the values of Judeo-Christian slave morality were duly taken up by the causes of democracy, socialism, equal rights – and other movements of the weak and ‘oppressed’.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-07-21 05:38:00 UTC