Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Warren-Buffett-considered-republican-or-democrat-Why/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=e1e41bdf&srid=u4QvFrom the period between the civil war and the 1970’s, the south held animosity toward the republican party over Lincoln’s civil war. This led to the Democratic and Republican parties having both conservative and classical liberal members.

    Beginning between 76 and 80 this began to change because the democratic party had been captured more aggressively by the radical left and the feminists. Plus the left had used immigration starting in 1964 as a means of achieving the socialist revolution (tearing down the american experiment) through demographic warfare where they had failed by propaganda and pseudoscience (marxism, boazianism, freudianism, cantorian mathematics, and keynesian post marxist economics.)

    By and large the democratic effort has been effective for large business and finance. So many large business owners that serve the unproductive, laboring, working, and lower middle classes (what he invests in), are better off with policy that increases consumption.

    Whereas the republican (Aristocratic) is far more concerned with accumulating capital in Human (eugenic), behavioral (normative), institutional (rule of law by tort reciprocity – not rule BY legislation), and territorial than current consumption which consumes human capital (dysgenic, dysnormative, discretionary rather than reciprocal.)

    So between his AGE, his REGION, and his INTERESTS he votes for conservative democratic policies.Updated Dec 28, 2017, 7:38 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 19:38:00 UTC

  • RUNS IN THE FAMILY…. On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Repor

    https://everipedia.org/wiki/Doolittle_Report%2C_1954/IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY….

    On intelligence agencies…..

    Summary

    The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA.

    (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.)

    Personnel

    The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”.

    ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. )

    (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )Updated Dec 28, 2017, 6:32 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:32:00 UTC

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/28/russia-bomb-confirmed-terror-putin-calls-terrorists-liquidated-spot/PUTIN. REPLACES “PHYSICAL REMOVAL” AND “HELICOPTER RIDES” WITH “ON THE SPOT LIQUIDATION”Updated Dec 28, 2017, 4:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 16:21:00 UTC

  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’”

    Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-27 06:14:00 UTC

  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’” Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

  • “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical car

    “Who is secure in all his basic needs? Who has work, spiritual care, medical care, housing, food, occasional entertainment, free clothing, free burial, free everything? The answer might be nuns and monks, but the standard reply is ‘prisoners’” Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn

  • “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, wha

    “When accordingly it is inquired, whence is evil, it must first be inquired, what is evil, which is nothing else than corruption, either of the measure, or the form, or the order, that belong to nature.” (Augustine)

  • THIS (via karl brooks)Updated Dec 25, 2017, 11:13 AM

    http://lithub.com/why-i-gave-homer-a-contemporary-voice-in-the-odyssey/READ THIS

    (via karl brooks)Updated Dec 25, 2017, 11:13 AM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-25 11:13:00 UTC