Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “When leaders again run the real risk of execution, we will again let them reign

    —“When leaders again run the real risk of execution, we will again let them reign as kings.”— Steve Pender

    (warranty = skin in the game)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-08 17:11:00 UTC

  • Um without Property Mother Is Knowable, with Property Father Is Knowable.

    Father=Property=Civilization —“So was Gimbutas, the woman behind the Kurgan hypothesis, which postulated that the Proto-Indo-Europeans originated on the East European steppe. She said that the Old Europeans were peaceful, matriarchal goddess-worshippers while the Proto-Indo-Europeans were warlike, patriarchal nomads in an attempt to construe their invasion as a negative event, and yet the opposite ensued and people were glad that they got rid of the degeneracy of the previous population. She wanted things to be a certain way and it backfired.”—Alexander Zavialov  Well, (a) yes it’s gimbutas that ‘discovered’ the urheimat. But (b) her feminist (matriarchy) theory I’m pretty sure went out the window. (c) it is true that in very primitive (early) societies households consisted of women and their men ‘rotated’ to fuck what they could. In this sense it was matrilineal. But that’s because YOUR MOTHER IS ALL YOU KNOW IS TRUE in a consanguineous band. It’s once you have property and divide up property and women that you get paternalism. Why? Because PROPERTY AND EXcluSIVITY IS KNOWABLE. (mostly). There aren’t any consanguineous bands left. Why? They can’t survive and compete without property.

  • Um without Property Mother Is Knowable, with Property Father Is Knowable.

    Father=Property=Civilization —“So was Gimbutas, the woman behind the Kurgan hypothesis, which postulated that the Proto-Indo-Europeans originated on the East European steppe. She said that the Old Europeans were peaceful, matriarchal goddess-worshippers while the Proto-Indo-Europeans were warlike, patriarchal nomads in an attempt to construe their invasion as a negative event, and yet the opposite ensued and people were glad that they got rid of the degeneracy of the previous population. She wanted things to be a certain way and it backfired.”—Alexander Zavialov  Well, (a) yes it’s gimbutas that ‘discovered’ the urheimat. But (b) her feminist (matriarchy) theory I’m pretty sure went out the window. (c) it is true that in very primitive (early) societies households consisted of women and their men ‘rotated’ to fuck what they could. In this sense it was matrilineal. But that’s because YOUR MOTHER IS ALL YOU KNOW IS TRUE in a consanguineous band. It’s once you have property and divide up property and women that you get paternalism. Why? Because PROPERTY AND EXcluSIVITY IS KNOWABLE. (mostly). There aren’t any consanguineous bands left. Why? They can’t survive and compete without property.

  • Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers

    —“Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg Hamilton Women evolved to think of individual children’s (and women’s) needs, while men evolved to think of the tribe (family) survival. Division of production cycles, division of temporal perception, cognition, calculation, and advocacy. We are amazing together, but we are cognitive specialists. We need to understand what part of the production cycle we specialize in. The now, the soon, the later, and the future.

  • Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers

    —“Males are required to make group judgements regardless of outliers. “— Greg Hamilton Women evolved to think of individual children’s (and women’s) needs, while men evolved to think of the tribe (family) survival. Division of production cycles, division of temporal perception, cognition, calculation, and advocacy. We are amazing together, but we are cognitive specialists. We need to understand what part of the production cycle we specialize in. The now, the soon, the later, and the future.

  • Libertarians Are Wrong. War Is the Best Industry After Rule.

    LIBERTARIANS ARE WRONG. WAR IS THE BEST INDUSTRY AFTER RULE.
    https://news.stanford.edu/2018/05/03/war-drove-18th-century-industrial-revolution-great-britain/
    WAR, RULE, FINANCE … Everything else is just noise.

  • Libertarians Are Wrong. War Is the Best Industry After Rule.

    LIBERTARIANS ARE WRONG. WAR IS THE BEST INDUSTRY AFTER RULE.
    https://news.stanford.edu/2018/05/03/war-drove-18th-century-industrial-revolution-great-britain/
    WAR, RULE, FINANCE … Everything else is just noise.

  • Bringing Psychology to Its Final Conclusion

    —“Curt Doolittle I noticed MBTI has turned into a sort of religion for a-lot of people. Unfortunate how this always happens.”—Candice Mary As I’ve said elsewhere sixteen (4×4) with archetypal names, is about as complex as the average person can manage to ‘calculate’ with. I would much rather have people use MBTI and understand that we have different categories, relations and values, than to attempt to use the freudian model to dominate them into a uniform ideal, by casting everything as a ‘disease’ that doesn’t conform to that ideal. Freudianism is freaking evil. MBTI and Jung are crayons and fairy tales yes, but like fairy tales they contain a lot more than a grain of truth. Among my clan of people so to speak, big 5/6 factors and underlying dimensions we get greater precision but with the same empathy at the cost of losing the utility of archetypes. If you understand my work you lose empathy completely, and see people as clockworks, lacking nearly all agency. Then you are faced with having to just love people for the joy of it, and not blame them for their failings. Which is the optimum understanding that the very wisest of us (particularly catholics) eventually arrive at, and is one of the reasons the very top scholars in the world cease their irreligiosity while the public intellectuals preserve atheism. Hence my multi-year quest to understand how to produce a religion that free of abrahamic sophism, deceit, and immoralism, but achieves what we all desire from religion: the peace of mind and frequent elation that comes from surrender to running with the pack. It is wolves and dogs running in packs in the wild we should study – because it is precisely that emotion of safety in belonging and the sharing of perception and understanding by nothing but body language that we verbal and rational creatures long for. Domesticated wolves are our friends for this reason. Just as the wolfman is a subconscious archetype: we are the apes who hunt like wolves. We simply had the advantage of two feet and opposable thumbs, and extraordinary heat dissipation so we could pass those wolves and domesticate ourselves. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Bringing Psychology to Its Final Conclusion

    —“Curt Doolittle I noticed MBTI has turned into a sort of religion for a-lot of people. Unfortunate how this always happens.”—Candice Mary As I’ve said elsewhere sixteen (4×4) with archetypal names, is about as complex as the average person can manage to ‘calculate’ with. I would much rather have people use MBTI and understand that we have different categories, relations and values, than to attempt to use the freudian model to dominate them into a uniform ideal, by casting everything as a ‘disease’ that doesn’t conform to that ideal. Freudianism is freaking evil. MBTI and Jung are crayons and fairy tales yes, but like fairy tales they contain a lot more than a grain of truth. Among my clan of people so to speak, big 5/6 factors and underlying dimensions we get greater precision but with the same empathy at the cost of losing the utility of archetypes. If you understand my work you lose empathy completely, and see people as clockworks, lacking nearly all agency. Then you are faced with having to just love people for the joy of it, and not blame them for their failings. Which is the optimum understanding that the very wisest of us (particularly catholics) eventually arrive at, and is one of the reasons the very top scholars in the world cease their irreligiosity while the public intellectuals preserve atheism. Hence my multi-year quest to understand how to produce a religion that free of abrahamic sophism, deceit, and immoralism, but achieves what we all desire from religion: the peace of mind and frequent elation that comes from surrender to running with the pack. It is wolves and dogs running in packs in the wild we should study – because it is precisely that emotion of safety in belonging and the sharing of perception and understanding by nothing but body language that we verbal and rational creatures long for. Domesticated wolves are our friends for this reason. Just as the wolfman is a subconscious archetype: we are the apes who hunt like wolves. We simply had the advantage of two feet and opposable thumbs, and extraordinary heat dissipation so we could pass those wolves and domesticate ourselves. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Selling Degrees vs Indulgences

    —“Academia is the modern priesthood.”— Bill Anderson  It should be. The academy evolved out of the church instead out of the greek and roman upper middle class and aristocracy. And who filled the void of the church when the church failed to adapt to modernity? The church-in-waiting. However, the church and it’s selling of Indulgences had NOTHING on the academy selling degrees that are meaningless. I mean, the academy is the greatest scam since monotheistic religion.