Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • Retweeted Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺 (@blaircottrell89): Being white affords you the priv

    Retweeted Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺 (@blaircottrell89):

    Being white affords you the privilege of working until you’re 75 to finance your own ethnic replacement.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 19:34:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Lord Ashcroft (@LordAshcroft): Please retweet if you agree that the Ro

    Retweeted Lord Ashcroft (@LordAshcroft):

    Please retweet if you agree that the Royal Family are a fantastic asset to the U.K. even if like any family there are issues from time to time…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 19:06:00 UTC

  • “If no one wants to avenge your death then you are doing something wrong.”—Noa

    —“If no one wants to avenge your death then you are doing something wrong.”—Noah J Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 18:35:00 UTC

  • “I won’t have any enemies unless I want to do evil. If you pursue good and seek

    —“I won’t have any enemies unless I want to do evil. If you pursue good and seek the truth, you are my brother.”– Aloysius Augustus

    (translated from español)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 18:29:00 UTC

  • “Trolling is forced transfer, intellectual honesty is productive reciprocal exch

    —“Trolling is forced transfer, intellectual honesty is productive reciprocal exchange.”— Steven Kolpek

    (Quote of the day)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 18:28:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness): @AngloRemnant Imagine being so steeped in

    Retweeted Outsideness (@Outsideness):

    @AngloRemnant Imagine being so steeped in racist and sexist evil that you actually discover DNA just to make the point.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-19 17:24:00 UTC

  • The Problem Isn”t Tech It’s Government Usurpation of Judgement Over the Commons

    —“Technology explodes the prevalence of externalities–not just the frequency, but also the variety. The faster the pace of technological evolution, the more urgent the need to develop better and better systems of accounting for externalities, and mechanisms for adequately imposing costs on those who generate them.”— Skinner Layne I would state it as wealth from technology makes it cheap to explore our differences and export externalities, for the simple reason that there is a delay between our development of any technology, the discovery of externalities, and the production of prohibitions on the actions that produce those (negative) externalities. And that the reason is government usurpation of our rights to use the courts to defend the commons as well as private and semi-private property. The wealthier we get the easier it is to use the courts and private interests to police innovations and externalities produced by them. The problem isn’t tech, or fear of tech, but that we have no systematic means of acting to constrain externalities in the commons because government has taken from us that role.

  • The Problem Isn”t Tech It’s Government Usurpation of Judgement Over the Commons

    —“Technology explodes the prevalence of externalities–not just the frequency, but also the variety. The faster the pace of technological evolution, the more urgent the need to develop better and better systems of accounting for externalities, and mechanisms for adequately imposing costs on those who generate them.”— Skinner Layne I would state it as wealth from technology makes it cheap to explore our differences and export externalities, for the simple reason that there is a delay between our development of any technology, the discovery of externalities, and the production of prohibitions on the actions that produce those (negative) externalities. And that the reason is government usurpation of our rights to use the courts to defend the commons as well as private and semi-private property. The wealthier we get the easier it is to use the courts and private interests to police innovations and externalities produced by them. The problem isn’t tech, or fear of tech, but that we have no systematic means of acting to constrain externalities in the commons because government has taken from us that role.

  • “Does that Mean the Thing They Killed Has No Value?”

    —“Curt Doolittle If someone kills something, and nobody punishes them for doing so, does that mean the thing they killed has no value?”— Michael D. Abbott omg that is a really really smart question. Really.. Um, if that person was not insured by others, then it means it did not have sufficient value to insure. That does not mean it had no potential value. —“It’s not only the things we pay for. It’s also the things we punish for as well, yes?”—Michael D. Abbott Um, I would ask you to be more precise but I think, yes. The fact that we punish for it, (insure it) is evidence of the value of something. The fact that we don’t (insure it) is evidence that we don’t’ Lets just remember that we’re a little stupid now and then… 😉

  • “Does that Mean the Thing They Killed Has No Value?”

    —“Curt Doolittle If someone kills something, and nobody punishes them for doing so, does that mean the thing they killed has no value?”— Michael D. Abbott omg that is a really really smart question. Really.. Um, if that person was not insured by others, then it means it did not have sufficient value to insure. That does not mean it had no potential value. —“It’s not only the things we pay for. It’s also the things we punish for as well, yes?”—Michael D. Abbott Um, I would ask you to be more precise but I think, yes. The fact that we punish for it, (insure it) is evidence of the value of something. The fact that we don’t (insure it) is evidence that we don’t’ Lets just remember that we’re a little stupid now and then… 😉