Form: Quote Commentary

  • at his best… set to music

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=GYLCu7855bo&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D50ZQEA0VkJA%26feature%3Dsharehttps://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=GYLCu7855bo&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D50ZQEA0VkJA%26feature%3DshareHoppe at his best… set to music.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:02:00 UTC

  • at his best… set to music

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=GYLCu7855bo&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D50ZQEA0VkJA%26feature%3DshareHoppe at his best… set to music.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:02:00 UTC

  • “The will to AGENCY (power) In Transformation of the Universe versus the will to

    —“The will to AGENCY (power) In Transformation of the Universe versus the will to DOMINANCE (power) Over Others.” —Nick Heywood


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 08:49:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia): @curtdoolittle As someone who

    Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia):

    @curtdoolittle As someone who read the entire summary page of propertarianism, YOU WILL LEARN TO LOVE READING, OR YOU WILL UNDERSTAND NOTHING ABOUT IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 02:21:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006360793984700417

  • “It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But,

    —“It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But, tis best not to expect others to kill their own, at least not without assistance.”—Neil A. Bucklew


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 02:03:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006356255177310209

  • Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia): @curtdoolittle As someone who

    Retweeted Adherent of Columbia (@A_Of_L_Columbia):

    @curtdoolittle As someone who read the entire summary page of propertarianism, YOU WILL LEARN TO LOVE READING, OR YOU WILL UNDERSTAND NOTHING ABOUT IT.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:21:00 UTC

  • “It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But,

    —“It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But, tis best not to expect others to kill their own, at least not without assistance.”—Neil A. Bucklew


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:03:00 UTC

  • by Alex Macleod The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the supersed

    by Alex Macleod

    The criminalisation of speech, thought and emotion, the superseding of common law, treason incorporated into law. The state demanding a monopoly of violence, a monopoly of truth, and using the monopoly of violence to enforce the monopoly of truth. And the state conducting alien colonisation is treason by itself.

    (genius)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 14:12:00 UTC

  • “Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law

    —“Slaughter your sacred cows because the growing market demand is for rule of law by natural law, reciprocity, order, a competent militia willing to implement incremental suppression of parasitism, and nature (god). The gods (forces of nature) can no longer tolerate lies (superstition, ignorance, bias, deceit, wishful thinking, pseudoscience, parasitism, and theft). Religion is for peasants, truth is for sovereign men and the demand for them is growing.”— Curtus Maximus (who’s real name i do not know)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:01:00 UTC

  • Dugin’s Book Says:

    DUGIN’S BOOK SAYS: The book declares that “the battle for the world rule of [ethnic] Russians” has not ended and Russia remains “the staging area of a new anti-bourgeois, anti-American revolution”. The Eurasian Empire will be constructed “on the fundamental principle of the common enemy: the rejection of Atlanticism, strategic control of the USA, and the refusal to allow liberal values to dominate us.“[9] Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook believes in a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded by the Russian special services. The operations should be assisted by a tough, hard-headed utilization of Russia’s gas, oil, and natural resources to bully and pressure other countries.[9] The book states that “the maximum task [of the future] is the ‘Finlandization’ of all of Europe”.[9] In Europe: Germany should be offered the de facto political dominance over most Protestant and Catholic states located within Central and Eastern Europe. Kaliningrad oblast could be given back to Germany. The book uses the term “Moscow–Berlin axis”.[9] France should be encouraged to form a “Franco–German bloc” with Germany. Both countries have a “firm anti-Atlanticist tradition”.[9] The United Kingdom should be cut off from Europe.[9] Finland should be absorbed into Russia. Southern Finland will be combined with the Republic of Karelia and northern Finland will be “donated to Murmansk Oblast”.[9] Estonia should be given to Germany’s sphere of influence.[9] Latvia and Lithuania should be given a “special status” in the Eurasian-Russian sphere.[9] Poland should be granted a “special status” in the Eurasian sphere.[9] Romania, Macedonia, “Serbian Bosnia” and Greece – “Orthodox collectivist East” – will unite with “Moscow the Third Rome” and reject the “rational-individualistic West”.[9] Ukraine should be annexed by Russia because “Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics”. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.[9] In the Middle East and Central Asia: The book stresses the “continental Russian–Islamic alliance” which lies “at the foundation of anti-Atlanticist strategy”. The alliance is based on the “traditional character of Russian and Islamic civilization”. Iran is a key ally. The book uses the term “Moscow–Tehran axis”.[9] Armenia has a special role: It will serve as a “strategic base,” and it is necessary to create “the [subsidiary] axis Moscow-Erevan-Teheran”. Armenians “are an Aryan people … [like] the Iranians and the Kurds”.[9] Azerbaijan could be “split up” or given to Iran.[9] Georgia should be dismembered. Abkhazia and “United Ossetia” (which includes Georgia’s South Ossetia) will be incorporated into Russia. Georgia’s independent policies are unacceptable.[9] Russia needs to create “geopolitical shocks” within Turkey. These can be achieved by employing Kurds, Armenians and other minorities.[9] The book regards the Caucasus as a Russian territory, including “the eastern and northern shores of the Caspian (the territories of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan)” and Central Asia (mentioning Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan).[9] In Asia: China, which represents a danger to Russia, “must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled”. Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking Tibet–Xinjiang–Mongolia–Manchuria as a security belt.[1] Russia should offer China help “in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia” as geopolitical compensation.[9] Russia should manipulate Japanese politics by offering the Kuril Islands to Japan and provoking anti-Americanism.[9] Mongolia should be absorbed into Eurasia-Russia.[9] The book emphasizes that Russia must spread Anti-Americanism everywhere: “the main ‘scapegoat’ will be precisely the U.S.” In the United States: Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke “Afro-American racists”. Russia should “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics”.[9] The Eurasian Project could be expanded to South and Central America.[9]