Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“Basically, if the West didnât re-develop the military capabilities of the Roman military until Napoleon, then please donât tell me the Dark Ages didnât happen. The Dark Age was real in the only way that matters.”—Daniel Roland Anderson
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 14:53:57 UTC
photos_and_videos/your_posts/36919686_10156484463217264_1121922513723457536_o_10156484463207264.jpg YES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉
(i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)Connor CreeganI read that as “Trayvon Martin” for a hot second.Jul 09, 2018 1:36pmJon JonathanWhen was violence ever removed from politics? Politics is the continuation of warfare by other means.Jul 09, 2018 2:10pmJames KnowlesClausewitz said it right.Jul 09, 2018 2:20pmJon JonathanClausiwitz said it the other way around.Jul 09, 2018 2:24pmJosef Kalinin”Politics is the distinction between friend and enemy.” – Carl SchmittJul 09, 2018 3:36pmJames KnowlesHis reference to war being politics?Jul 09, 2018 6:09pmJon Jonathanwar is a continuation of politics by other means.Jul 09, 2018 6:11pmDylan KnowlesWar is politics in its simplist form. Without violence there are no politics there is no control. Violence aimed outward, Aimed inward, Aimed against everyone or no one. Without violence or the threat there of politics does not exist.Jul 10, 2018 12:21pmYES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉
(i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 13:26:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/36919686_10156484463217264_1121922513723457536_o_10156484463207264.jpg YES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉
(i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)Connor CreeganI read that as “Trayvon Martin” for a hot second.Jul 09, 2018 1:36pmJon JonathanWhen was violence ever removed from politics? Politics is the continuation of warfare by other means.Jul 09, 2018 2:10pmJames KnowlesClausewitz said it right.Jul 09, 2018 2:20pmJon JonathanClausiwitz said it the other way around.Jul 09, 2018 2:24pmJosef Kalinin”Politics is the distinction between friend and enemy.” – Carl SchmittJul 09, 2018 3:36pmJames KnowlesHis reference to war being politics?Jul 09, 2018 6:09pmJon Jonathanwar is a continuation of politics by other means.Jul 09, 2018 6:11pmDylan KnowlesWar is politics in its simplist form. Without violence there are no politics there is no control. Violence aimed outward, Aimed inward, Aimed against everyone or no one. Without violence or the threat there of politics does not exist.Jul 10, 2018 12:21pmYES. WHAT HE SAID! 😉
(i’m too busy writing Doolittleism to Read Doolittleisms.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 13:26:00 UTC
—“Basically, if the West didn’t re-develop the military capabilities of the Roman military until Napoleon, then please don’t tell me the Dark Ages didn’t happen. The Dark Age was real in the only way that matters.”—Daniel Roland Anderson
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 10:53:00 UTC
—“We depend upon Morality in the negotiation between oursleves and others for front row seats (or even seats half way) in the present theater of life. The strong have less of a need to negotiate than the weak. The weak are more fanatic about morality precisely because they lack the (inner) strength to manifest themselves in life. They need the approval of others. And the weaker you are, the more nonsense you drag into the moral negotiation.”—Roger Dols
Good articulation – yes. Also. If you are very wealthy (which i have been), with any degree of influence (power), then you come to understand that nothing changes whatsoever, other than the wealth and influence of those who you compete with, and their decreasing compatibility of interests with you. and you can trust no one. It is nearly as difficult to defend wealth as it is to make it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 10:07:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
FRAMES….
by Bill Joslin
So to distill this down a bit more.
As far as I can tell, cognition has three broad frames, experiential (perceptual), imperative (action-reaction), and consequential (perceptual feedback of action-reaction).
The progress of disambiguation of grammars has been the incremental movement toward accounting for all three frames. The ambiguous grammars have been a reduction in accounting to all three frames (ussually preferences one frame over others).
The accounting and interplay between each frame (a market) decontextualizes the information to the consequential frame (the only frame which encompasses the other two).
What we are doing with testimonialism is translating experiential and imperative data into a consequential frame where it can be tested (falsified)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 00:10:51 UTC
—“The Strategic Answer to the Parasitic Question: Survival Strategies Must Evolve to Combat Parasitism or be subsumed by it.”— Todd Magnusson
h/t: via Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 23:54:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016108357302833153
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“The Strategic Answer to the Parasitic Question: Survival Strategies Must Evolve to Combat Parasitism or be subsumed by it.”— Todd Magnusson
h/t: via Bill Joslin
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 23:54:35 UTC
—“I’m up for via-negativa law, via-positiva fiction, and via-reciprocity trade.”— Bryan Nova Brey
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 21:34:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016072939878404096
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“Iâm up for via-negativa law, via-positiva fiction, and via-reciprocity trade.”— Bryan Nova Brey
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 21:33:49 UTC