Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • The Two Party System Neutralizes IQ Differences

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 • In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice. • This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology. •Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice. •In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties. Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.) However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views. The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology. Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.

  • The Two Party System Neutralizes IQ Differences

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 • In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice. • This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology. •Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice. •In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties. Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.) However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views. The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology. Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships—relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person.”—

    Roman (Wall) 8 men x 10(80) x 6(480) x 10(4800) (legion)
    American (Packs) 10 x 4(40) x 4.x (175) x 4(700) (battalion) x 6.4(4500+) (Brigade)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 18:14:58 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE COST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EVERY MAN A WARRIOR,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE COST OF SOVEREIGNTY: EVERY MAN A WARRIOR, SHERIFF, INSURER

    —“It’s a bit unclear but let’s say everybody is a free agent and as such free to do what one wants as long as his actions don’t impose additional costs to somebody else…would that be correct..? “—Antonio Simon

    Close, but there is a cost (duty) to pay for such a thing, because free agents are not able to resist opponents, if they are allowed to free ride on the defense of accumulateed and asymmetrically distributed capital.

    Every man a warrior, a sheriff, and reciprocal insurer, and then every man is sovereign, possessing both liberty (capital) and freedom (action and speech).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 17:03:14 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITI

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITIES

    —-”Is it appropriate to racially profile college applicants to promote diversity in admissions?”—-

    If we use exclusively meritocratic entry, and domestic-only entry, then we aren’t harming anyone in the polity because of their race.

    If we use profiling (discriminatory) entry, and include international entry, then we **are harming** people in the polity because of their race.

    The only moral (meaning reciprocal) and non-harmful method of allowing profiling (discrimination) is to allow (create) segregated (race-limited) universities.

    So we are just (reciprocal, moral) **only** when we have EITHER of the two conditions:
    (a) domestic merit only, or we have
    (b) discrimination and voluntary association and disassociation (race – limited universities.)

    And the current condition is harmful, immoral, unethical, and a violation of natural law of reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:38:29 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Lu

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?
    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)
    =================================
    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61
    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72
    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58
    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14
    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03
    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34
    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:24:20 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The irony is that it is only through a pr

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled with ideological courage that Curt Doolittle is able to diagnose a variety of issues with great accuracy.

    But [your prescription] sounds more like radical leftism repackaged. And though there might be some deterministic accuracy to the rise of radicalism in both forms (ends of the political spectrum), I personally would only die for one cause – individual liberty 🗽

    And history shows that this ideology (liberty) is closer to the broader human spirit than accidental ethnic relationships devoid of spirit and culture (real culture).

    Your worldview is self defeating in that your own ideas could have never come to fruition with the your vision of the future. (I do recognize that referring to yourself in such a way disarms the oppositions narrative) but at what cost?”—Rob Ellerman

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:16:30 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SEPARATION IS ENOUGH OF A SOLUTION —“Overt

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SEPARATION IS ENOUGH OF A SOLUTION

    —“Overt action is not always needful for the drastic removal of lower organisms. Very often, if left alone, degenerates cremate themselves. If given control of governmental mechanisms, they immediately commence to grind one another into mincemeat (that is to say, into dividends)” — Redbeard

    (via Brandon Hayes)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 14:55:53 UTC

  • “Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with who

    —“Dunbar’s Number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships—relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person.”—

    Roman (Wall) 8 men x 10(80) x 6(480) x 10(4800) (legion)

    American (Packs) 10 x 4(40) x 4.x (175) x 4(700) (battalion) x 6.4(4500+) (Brigade)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 14:14:00 UTC

  • HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Luke Weinhagen What happens to the fe

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whiteshttp://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whitesWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?

    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)

    =================================

    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61

    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72

    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58

    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14

    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03

    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34

    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:24:00 UTC