Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. OPTIONS: SURROGACY – BYPASS THE FEMINIST GENERATIO

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    OPTIONS: SURROGACY – BYPASS THE FEMINIST GENERATIONS

    Estimated cost for traditional surrogacy ranges from $40,000 to $65,000 while for gestational surrogacy prices range from $75,000 to $100,000.

    How Much Does Surrogacy Cost – Parent Palace
    parentpalace.com/2011/09/how-much-does-surrogacy-cost/

    If we could produce legit credit lines for this I bet it would go thru the roof. I mean. There are women who would make a living doing nothing but earning 50K a year tax free for turning out surrogate children, and utterly bypassing the marriage and reproduction problem for men.

    I mean… If you could buy yourself a generation? If we did as I recommended, which is to elminate interest on home loans nearly every man could affort two or three of his own children and have zero chance of divorce, aliminony, child support. And train his chidlren as he saw fit.

    The feminist generations are suicidal. So, men just need to outlast them. By making an industry out of reproductivity. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 17:01:32 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUP

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.

    —“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793

    Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.

    Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).

    I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.

    I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 16:20:40 UTC

  • TOO MANY LAZY BETA MEN IN SOCIETY —“The way women pursue and the way men pursu

    TOO MANY LAZY BETA MEN IN SOCIETY

    —“The way women pursue and the way men pursue is very different. Women make themselves selectively available to men they find attractive. They seek to be in his orbit. Men then pick out a woman who has made herself available and “take” her. …. The number one complaint that my female clients share is that when they make themselves available to a man he often fails to take any sort of leadership actions such as ask them out. Instead he just beta orbits hoping she will mother him. We have too many untrained, lazy, beta men in society.”— Noah Revoy

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 15:27:00 UTC

  • ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT. —

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.

    —“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793

    Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.

    Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).

    I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.

    I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC

  • ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT. —

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793WHITES ARE LESS CLANNISH (RACIST) THAN OTHER GROUPS – THATS JUST THE SCIENCE OF IT.

    —“Interesting thought from Kevin MacDonald that I haven’t pondered before – many high-performing whites so aspie that they feel nothing for their people?”— John Mark

    https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1023311716422049793

    Jayman and HBDChick both suggest that we developed lower clannishness, and the research supports it. The question is why. Either the value of human life in low population density (cold), or the cold’s influence on neoteny, or both.

    Since it does not appear in the siberians/alut/amerindians (they are super predators) but it does in the east asians who have even greater neoteny than we do (to their detriment – although they use nationalism and racism as a defense against the weakness).

    I suggest that it’s more likely the result of the mixture of pastoralism agrarianism metalworking, and winters, and the downward expansion of the middle class under manorialism.

    I also suggest whites have far greater agency than any others, which is a male genetic property. This is why we differ from east asians. We have greater agency despite our parallel neoteny.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-01 12:20:00 UTC

  • This Fracas Ought to Get Interesting

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578
    “Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews” (As far as I know it’s true. the original plans were relocation. I do not know what altered that plan other than the economics of warehousing and resettlement. Hitler often took the lead from Stalin, and Stalin had been extremely successful with the use of relocation. I am not really interested in this topic so much as interested in how to expel large numbers of invaders as have others, including the spanish, germans, and russians, over the centuries.) link: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578 Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews Prime minister tells World Zionist Congress that Hitler only wanted to expel the Jews, but Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti convinced him to exterminate them, a claim that was rejected by most accepted Holocaust scholars. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler’s mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them. In a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem, Netanyahu described a meeting between Husseini and Hitler in November, 1941: “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jew. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here (to Palestine).’ According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: “What should I do with them?” and the mufti replied: “Burn them.” Netanyahu’s remarks were quick to spark a social media storm, though Netanyahu made a similar claim during a Knesset speech in 2012, where he described the Husseini as “one of the leading architects” of the final solution.

  • This Fracas Ought to Get Interesting

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578
    “Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews” (As far as I know it’s true. the original plans were relocation. I do not know what altered that plan other than the economics of warehousing and resettlement. Hitler often took the lead from Stalin, and Stalin had been extremely successful with the use of relocation. I am not really interested in this topic so much as interested in how to expel large numbers of invaders as have others, including the spanish, germans, and russians, over the centuries.) link: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578 Netanyahu: Hitler Didn’t Want to Exterminate the Jews Prime minister tells World Zionist Congress that Hitler only wanted to expel the Jews, but Jerusalem’s Grand Mufti convinced him to exterminate them, a claim that was rejected by most accepted Holocaust scholars. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Tuesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler’s mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them. In a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem, Netanyahu described a meeting between Husseini and Hitler in November, 1941: “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jew. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here (to Palestine).’ According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: “What should I do with them?” and the mufti replied: “Burn them.” Netanyahu’s remarks were quick to spark a social media storm, though Netanyahu made a similar claim during a Knesset speech in 2012, where he described the Husseini as “one of the leading architects” of the final solution.

  • ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahami

    ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahamism: |REVOLTS| Monotheism > Marxism > Postmodernism All three are underclass revolts against the dominant class; All three are attacks against western technologies of reason > enlightenment (empiricism) > science. We engage over millennia in attack and counter attack. The weapons change but those wielding them remain the same. They attack Christianity not because of what it is, but because of the people who remain Christian today.

  • ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahami

    ATTACK AND COUNTER ATTACK by Andy Lunn Postmodernism is an evolution of Abrahamism: |REVOLTS| Monotheism > Marxism > Postmodernism All three are underclass revolts against the dominant class; All three are attacks against western technologies of reason > enlightenment (empiricism) > science. We engage over millennia in attack and counter attack. The weapons change but those wielding them remain the same. They attack Christianity not because of what it is, but because of the people who remain Christian today.

  • THEIR MILLENNIA OF INTELLECTUAL TERRORISM —“Their crimes are millennia long. T

    THEIR MILLENNIA OF INTELLECTUAL TERRORISM

    —“Their crimes are millennia long. They are the premier intellectual terrorists.”— Andrey Sokoloff

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 19:45:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1024380557566861313