—“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want:… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289818251615072&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 20:42:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036353711419936775
https://aeolipera.wordpress.com/2018/08/28/ego-investment-and-real-reliance/Not a fan of his use of ‘ego’ rather than scientific terms, but this post is worth a read on SEPARATISMUpdated Sep 2, 2018, 7:34 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 19:34:00 UTC
SURE BUT HOW HAVE MEN DROPPED THE BALL?
by Lisa Outhwaite
There’s a lot of talk on how women are particularly gullible when it comes to abandoning their tribe or being vulnerable to psychological attack by subversive movements etc. and I’ve got to say that, whilst I understand the emotional need in intellectually forcing women into submission, the arguments themselves are quite skewed.
How many wars have men been propagandised into fighting on behalf of their enemies? Even as far back as 1900, members of the British Parliament were bemoaning the extent to which the British army was being utilised to serve Jewish interests:
—‘“Wherever we examine, there is a financial Jew operating, directing and inspiring the agonies that have led to this war…the British army which used to be used for all good causes…has become the janissary of the Jews” – John Burns, before a full House of Commons.
Jews have frequently manipulated the Nordic man’s love of heroism and noble warfare, using him as a war-mutt to expand their power base. (CD: as well as neoconservatism in the usa)
It was an all male government, high on universal values and weakened by civilised living, that first granted Jews the right to stand as MPs. Freely handing the reins of power and protection for their tribe over to an openly hostile out-group. Naturally, they made short work of that error by securing 16 further Jewish MPs and a Jewish Prime Minister, who openly advocated for Jewish racial supremacy, in just a few short decades.
That natural nobility in European men and a propensity to seek justice is counterbalanced by an idealism bordering on naive. (CD: the down side of heroism)
I’m happy and willing to discuss where women have dropped the ball but that analysis needs some balance now. If for no other reason than that a continual shifting of blame only serves to further weaken true masculine strength.
(CD: Argument has been made many times that expansionary Christianity, Commerce, and Moralism are just excuses for exercising Aryanism)
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 18:16:00 UTC
YOU GET WHAT YOU TRUST
by Justin Allred
Monarchy – Tyranny
Aristocracy – Oligarchy
Polity – Democracy
x-axis: high trust<->low trust
y-axis: distributed political agency <->concentrated political agency
The government you end up with is determined by what point on this scale your polity equilibriates.
—-
Curt says: And I think distributed vs concentrated reflects (a) homogeneity vs diversity, and (b) Militia vs Professionals, vs Conscripts.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 16:59:00 UTC
—“If you want to know the correct opinion on anything relating to the internet – censorship, privacy, net neutrality, bluecheck privilege – it’s the opposite of what the NIGARFAGTs want: Netflix, Instagram, Gofundme, Amazon, Reddit, Facebook, Apple, Google, and Twitter.”—Michael Andrade
(Via Steve Pender)
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 16:42:00 UTC
BREAK UP THE MONOPOLIES
—“These companies have to be broken up just like Teddy Roosevelt broke up the trusts. These [companies] are run by sociopaths,” he said. “These people are complete… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289745271622370&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 15:59:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036282484835663873
by Alex Macleod
—“There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy” —
For that to be a true statement, those ‘more things’ must be knowable unknowns, known to the speaker but not to Horatio.
Likewise with the electromagnetic spectrum, it was a knowable unknown, but could not be claimed to exist before knowledge of it.
It’s not possible to refer to an unknowable unknown. No one can make a valid (true) claim to the existence of unknowable unknowns, such as ‘god’ or ‘a spiritual experience’ or ‘self-realisation’, unknowable unknowns cannot have any bearing on existence, as they cannot be experienced, testified to or referred to.
They cannot exist. It’s an empty box, so fuck off with your empty box.
A philanthropist might take the time to point out that what people claim to be ‘spiritual’ must be emotion, thought or sensation, and either diseased emotion, thought or sensation, or beautiful emotion, thought and sensation, that the person has been persuaded to have hijacked by someone else’s psychic disease, and flown to the destination ‘I felt god speak to me’ etc
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 14:08:00 UTC
—Christianity is Not ‘false’, just figurative. Not literal. John Warner Mathisen has shown that the stories of the worlds religions are figurative stories(myths) describing the… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289708204959410&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-02 13:53:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036250795044429824
—“Q: What would you be if you were not a Muslim?”— A Quora User—“A: I shall try to be an either Marxist or Maoist.during my boyhood I am a very deep fan of above two scholars or leaders of the political concept. Once you take away the interest based economy for which Islam is targeted so much by the Illuminati type economist of the west there remain only a few superficial stigmas between Communism and Islam.”— Amanullah Kunja, doctorate in philosophy and comparative religion ^ Insightful and true. First Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam. Then Judaism -> Marxist Communism (Pseudoscience and sophism). Then Christianity -> French Postmodernism (Falsehood and Sophism).Meanwhile Islam -> Islam, Islam, Islam, all the way down. (Supernaturalism) But then, this is precisely why the developed world worked so hard to prevent the spread of militant communism to the middle east, and even without the spread of communism, we have seen that militant islam simply adopted the strategy of militant communism. And so our efforts have had to continue. Communism is just a pseudoscientific restatement of supernatural semiticism. Semiticism is simply the pastoralist tribal ethic at war with the agrarian technological ethic. It’s not complicated. Masculine (competition) Agrarian Group strategy vs Feminine (justification) pastoralist Herd Group Strategy. Masculine (indo european) method of argument vs feminine method of argument (semitic). Cain and Able.
—“Q: What would you be if you were not a Muslim?”— A Quora User—“A: I shall try to be an either Marxist or Maoist.during my boyhood I am a very deep fan of above two scholars or leaders of the political concept. Once you take away the interest based economy for which Islam is targeted so much by the Illuminati type economist of the west there remain only a few superficial stigmas between Communism and Islam.”— Amanullah Kunja, doctorate in philosophy and comparative religion ^ Insightful and true. First Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam. Then Judaism -> Marxist Communism (Pseudoscience and sophism). Then Christianity -> French Postmodernism (Falsehood and Sophism).Meanwhile Islam -> Islam, Islam, Islam, all the way down. (Supernaturalism) But then, this is precisely why the developed world worked so hard to prevent the spread of militant communism to the middle east, and even without the spread of communism, we have seen that militant islam simply adopted the strategy of militant communism. And so our efforts have had to continue. Communism is just a pseudoscientific restatement of supernatural semiticism. Semiticism is simply the pastoralist tribal ethic at war with the agrarian technological ethic. It’s not complicated. Masculine (competition) Agrarian Group strategy vs Feminine (justification) pastoralist Herd Group Strategy. Masculine (indo european) method of argument vs feminine method of argument (semitic). Cain and Able.