Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • “The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allo

    —-“The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allocate limited resources, such as mates and food (Sapolsky, 2005), facilitate social learning (Henrich & Mcelreath, 2003), and maximize individual motivation (Halevy et al, 2011; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). By definition, some individuals within the hierarchy – those at the top – will be afforded more resources and benefits than others, thus affecting morbidity and mortality. Despite that fact that there are always losers in this scenario, social hierarchies are highly pervasive across human cultures (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and they appear to emerge naturally in social groups (Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980; Chase, Tovey, Spangler-Martin, & Manfredonia, 2002; Gould, 2002; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Further, this group organization is not strictly a product of human cognition, as almost every group-living species demonstrates a natural tendency to organize into a social hierarchy (Sapolsky, 2004; 2005) where the higher-ranking members possess more power, influence, and advantages than the lower-ranking members (Fragale, Overbeck, & Neale, 2011; Mazur, 1985; Zitek & Tiedens, 2012).”—

    ( h/t Bill Joslin )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 22:06:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 20:29:00 UTC

  • “No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via edu

    —“No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via education or instruction. A high IQ just makes it cheaper.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 18:09:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037764650094551041

  • “No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via edu

    —“No society is rich enough to artificially prop up a nation indefinitely via education or instruction. A high IQ just makes it cheaper.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 14:09:00 UTC

  • “A particular civilisation can withstand all manner of internal or external uphe

    —“A particular civilisation can withstand all manner of internal or external upheavals – climatic, economic, resource scarcity, epidemic etc. and be able to rebuild true to type provided a… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=291081181488779&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 13:49:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1037699335964827648

  • AMERICAN CENSORSHIP IS MERELY PRIVATELY FUNDED —“The West also has its Roskomn

    AMERICAN CENSORSHIP IS MERELY PRIVATELY FUNDED

    —“The West also has its Roskomnadzor (Ros’-ko-mnad’-zor / Роскомнадзор), but it’s private.”— Maxim V Filimonov

    Roskomnadzor: The Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media or Roskomnadzor is the Russian federal executive body responsible for censorship in media and telecommunications

    Founded: May 12, 2008

    Number of employees: 3,019 (2017)

    Headquarters: Moscow, Russia

    Parent agency: Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media of the Russian FederationUpdated Sep 6, 2018, 12:01 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 12:01:00 UTC

  • “A particular civilisation can withstand all manner of internal or external uphe

    —“A particular civilisation can withstand all manner of internal or external upheavals – climatic, economic, resource scarcity, epidemic etc. and be able to rebuild true to type provided a sustainable portion of the founding stock remains. Should the founding stock be replaced, bred-out or overwhelmed by outsiders, there is absolutely no hope of a return to what went before. Religion, ritual, education or any other form of transformative instruction is a thin gild that will always give way over time to the base metal underneath.”— Lisa Outhwaite

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 09:49:00 UTC

  • “Northeast Asians, compared to Europeans, have higher gene frequencies of polymo

    —“Northeast Asians, compared to Europeans, have higher gene frequencies of polymorphisms which make people collectivist, socially anxious, and fearful of anything novel. Kura and his team argue that this is adaptation to a particular ecology, where it is vital to stay in a tightly-bonded group.

    However, they note that scientific innovators tend to combine very high IQ with an optimally low level of collectivism, low social anxiety and low fearfulness of the new. In other words, they have high “Openness-Intellec t”, as psychologists term this trait. This psychological profile means that they can think outside the box and don’t care about the offence to vested interests which their new idea will almost certainly result in.

    This is why, maintains Kura, it is the West that generated the Industrial Revolution, rather than more intelligent Northeast Asians. The West is indeed the Goldilocks Zone for genius.”—

    http://www.unz.com/article/dysgenics-and-low-creativity-why-china-cant-save-civilization/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 02:37:00 UTC

  • “[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intell

    —“[Chinese] are suffering precisely the same process as the West. The most intelligent females are not selecting for the most intelligent Chinese males or, indeed, any males. As in the West, they are dedicating themselves to their education and then their careers, meaning they are simply failing to pass on their genes at all.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-06 02:35:00 UTC

  • Pervasive Social Hierarchies

    September 6th, 2018 10:06 PM

    —-“The purpose of social hierarchies is to organize social groups in order to allocate limited resources, such as mates and food (Sapolsky, 2005), facilitate social learning (Henrich & Mcelreath, 2003), and maximize individual motivation (Halevy et al, 2011; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). By definition, some individuals within the hierarchy – those at the top – will be afforded more resources and benefits than others, thus affecting morbidity and mortality. Despite that fact that there are always losers in this scenario, social hierarchies are highly pervasive across human cultures (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999) and they appear to emerge naturally in social groups (Anderson, John, Keltner, & Kring, 2001; Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980; Chase, Tovey, Spangler-Martin, & Manfredonia, 2002; Gould, 2002; Magee & Galinsky, 2008). Further, this group organization is not strictly a product of human cognition, as almost every group-living species demonstrates a natural tendency to organize into a social hierarchy (Sapolsky, 2004; 2005) where the higher-ranking members possess more power, influence, and advantages than the lower-ranking members (Fragale, Overbeck, & Neale, 2011; Mazur, 1985; Zitek & Tiedens, 2012).”—

    ( h/t Bill Joslin )