Form: Quote Commentary

  • RT @TheMantle: It’s not just you, there does seem to be a further splitting of p

    RT @TheMantle: It’s not just you, there does seem to be a further splitting of political/ideological groups. Peter Limberg and Conor Barnes…


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 02:27:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047312236677648385

  • Again, I’m promoting this article because it’s the best work so far on our curre

    Again, I’m promoting this article because it’s the best work so far on our current “Tribes”. https://twitter.com/peternlimberg/status/1040392513943687169

  • “Yes they have far higher incidence of homosexuality. … As far as I know homos

    —“Yes they have far higher incidence of homosexuality. …
    As far as I know homosexuality among theirs is more than double ( I assume it’s close to triple) that of ours. Plus, homosexuality… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=299881143942116&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 01:30:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047297737413341184

  • “Politically, socially, or otherwise: as fragmentation grows linearly, the surfa

    —“Politically, socially, or otherwise: as fragmentation grows linearly, the surface area across which a coherent system must retain interfaces grows exponentially. This selection pressure… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=299876563942574&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 01:04:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047291230772764672

  • LIKE I SAID, THEY’RE ALL FEMALE AND THIS IS WHY *Reverse dimorphism* —“Another

    LIKE I SAID, THEY’RE ALL FEMALE AND THIS IS WHY

    *Reverse dimorphism*

    —“Another big study is going on at UCLA, this one of discordant for homosexuality. I believe this is the study that… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=299875057276058&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-03 00:56:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1047289225102725121

  • Oct 2, 2018, 10:43 PM

    https://aeon.co/ideas/religion-is-about-emotion-regulation-and-its-very-good-at-itUpdated Oct 2, 2018, 10:43 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:43:00 UTC

  • NBC PhiladelphiaHeadless Viking Statue Pulled From Schuylkill River a hate crime

    NBC PhiladelphiaHeadless Viking Statue Pulled From Schuylkill Riverhttps://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Thorfinn-Karlsefni-Statue-Schuylkill-River-494894611.htmlIt’s a hate crime. just as confederate statue damage is a hate crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:37:00 UTC

  • Oct 2, 2018, 10:36 PM

    https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Thorfinn-Karlsefni-Statue-Schuylkill-River-494894611.htmlUpdated Oct 2, 2018, 10:36 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:36:00 UTC

  • READ AND UNDERSTAND by Brandon Hayes Humans we are fractionating! This is obviou

    READ AND UNDERSTAND

    by Brandon Hayes

    Humans we are fractionating! This is obvious to those paying any attention. However, instead of being excited for the chance to speciate; we’re panicked; why?

    Well, I’m going to venture a guess it has something to do with the reason the fractionation is taking place.

    If you look at the chart (painstakingly put together I imagine) many of those groups are of the new abstract type mentioned above. They are groups basing their identity on their collective prejudiced opinions of out-groups.

    I’ve written recently about empathy (and compassion) as poor out-group strategies as they favor an out-group over an in-group. However, the action to be taken in lieu of empathy isn’t combat! Nuance people, nuance!

    Cooperation or non-interaction between groups is better (more positive results) than blind empathy (hurts the in-group) or conflict (destroys the weaker group). What the above paper labels as out-group learning, that’s understanding those not in your group, reduces prejudice by a significant margin. Who would have thought understanding those different than you makes you judge them less (typically)! <That’s sarcasm internet; of course this is the case.

    People say don’t judge; this is like asking people not to think. Humans make judgments when they think; they don’t get to turn that off when it comes to humans (or groups of humans). Every man ought to be an adequate and fair judge of reality; it’s a duty.

    We ought to welcome the speciation by creating groups based on in-group preference (mainly) and save the out-group prejudice for those acting to harm us (they exist but it’s not everyone who thinks a bit differently than you).

    If we coalesce into one human race we lose our evolutionary advantages (as these are culture and geographic specific); we squander the human biological platform; we make a joke out of what evolution took 3.5 billion years to create. Just because we can become one, doesn’t mean it is the proper path. [Breeding all the dogs breeds together to make a “super dog” DOESN’T work < this is not how genetics works]

    We can get along without destroying what made us evolutionarily viable. We can cohabitate in peace. Love should wane with each concentric kinship sphere; we should look to cooperate and create “win, wins”; what good is being human if we can’t transcend what makes us animal?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 22:14:00 UTC

  • “Yes they have far higher incidence of homosexuality. … As far as I know homos

    —“Yes they have far higher incidence of homosexuality. …

    As far as I know homosexuality among theirs is more than double ( I assume it’s close to triple) that of ours. Plus, homosexuality goes up with decline in religious observance (or rather, religious observance declines with homosexuality).”—

    The possibility that the genes for female expression are not suppressed would fit the high rates of inheritance. Hopefully that research will come out.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-02 21:30:00 UTC