Curt Doolittle

Form: Quote Commentary

  • ACCELERATION By James Santagata I really cannot believe how fast this is all blo

    ACCELERATION

    By James Santagata

    I really cannot believe how fast this is all blowing up.

    The NPC meme is off the f—king charts now!

    At the same time, fist fights going on all over – just that media is blocking it out. Portland proud boys, american nationalists etc: 20 guys took on 100 antifa and kicked the living s–t out of them

    Antifas throwing white paint, urine, using sticks

    and police just sat there. Between that inaction + these “1st amendment audits” where the police at their stations

    beat anyone with a camera on public sidewalk – despite the supreme court rules okay.

    Everyone who matters red pilled. Now it is just a matter of scaling and helping people understand what their roles are and how to get immediately actionable training.

    Even if it is to sit in regular meetings at the govt with shitlibs and morph into a SJW , and record it all on your iphone and leak.

    NPC is a beautiful meme, because it is a metaphor for gaming

    BUT also triggers emotional dissociation and dehumanization – and we all know why that is necessary.

    This is why THE LEFT are sh—ting themselves.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 10:47:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD AS EMPIRICISM: QUOTE AND COUNTER EXPLANATION —“Edmund

    CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD AS EMPIRICISM: QUOTE AND COUNTER EXPLANATION

    —“Edmund Burke was an English politician who wrote his Reflections on the Revolution in France to express his disdain for the destructive havoc wrought by the French Revolution. As a traditionalist-conservative, he thinks about social change in a cautious and incremental way and characterizes the social contract as binding on those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are yet to be born. Studying the anti-Enlightenment differs from the study of the Enlightenment because traditional conservatives of the Burkean school reject the idea of formulating a theory upon which to base society. Their views can be more accurately characterized as attitudes or dispositions. Social change is possible, but it must reflect the thinking of “the man on the Clapham omnibus.” Thinkers like Burke and Devlin place individuals as subordinate to society and its traditions.”—

    This is a misrepresentation – individuals are not ‘subordinate’ to society and its traditions. It’s that man in every era overestimates his ability and insight (dunning-kruger), so the use of intergenerational contract property and exchange limits intertemporal action to the empirical just as contract and property do in the temporal, and prices and property and exchange do in the immediate.

    British (Anglo Saxons) are empiricists. They have been empiricists for a very long time. Burkean Conservatism (“Conservatism”) is merely the application of EMPIRICISM to all affairs, using time, property, contract, and markets to limit the hubris of the well intentioned, and the evil of the ill intentioned.

    ALL DOMINANT MALES ARE NATURALLY BURKEAN (CONSERVATIVE): EMPIRICAL.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 09:31:00 UTC

  • THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING —“lots of

    THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF SLAVERY AND PEASANTRY USE FEMININE REASONING

    —“lots of words, lots of confusion mixed with lots of true facts which are unfortunately unrelated to the topic. It’s all very simple: The essence of Marx and Marxism is economic class. Marx and real Marxists focus on economic class–rich vs. poor, owners vs. employees, etc. Real Marxists call themselves “Marxists”. So-called “cultural Marxists” do not call themselves “cultural Marxists”, and they mainly ignore economic class. They focus instead on everything BESIDES economic class. Their thinking is in many important ways the OPPOSITE of Marxism. It’s very simple. I don’t know why so many people refuse to even acknowledge these basics.”– Illarion B. Bykov

    Because you’re confusing what people intend. Instead it matters:

    1) What method of argument (sophism, and self deception)

    2) Whether they are making true or false claims on true or false premises,

    3) What people intend(or claim) vs the operations and consequences that they produce,

    4) Whether they are advocating reciprocity and production and eugenics, or proportionality, parasitism, and dysgenics.

    IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT YOU MEAN. It matters what you do, and the consequences of doing so. and whether you’re advocating theft and dysgenia, or reciprocity and eugenia.

    1) People were not oppressed. inferior humans were incrementally domesticated just like all other animals, in the most peaceful way possible: manorialism, criminal prosecution, incompetence in the face of nature, and winter, disease, and war weeding them.

    And;

    2) The classes exist because of competency despite nepotism and regression to the mean, because (a) we are materially different in the distribution of personality traits, and weighted to the bottom without continuous eugenic administration; (b) we are different in utility to one another due to Pareto distribution of ability (ten percent of people do half the work, recursively unto the last person); and (c) man MUST organize by Pareto (power) distributions for the same reason that the Iron Law of Oligarchy exists: decisions must be made from a distribution of coincidences of wants.

    And;

    3) There are only three means of organizing people with those traits: force, remuneration (reward), and ostracization (conformity vs reputation destruction).

    And;

    4) There are only three means of transforming the universe for our use: labor (physical transformation), calculation (numbers, science, etc), organization (priests, managers, executives), and rule (force law violence war). The use of which means of coercion (force/law/truth/science, religion/philosophy/ideology, commerce/law/credit) can be specialized into a monopoly (east), specialized into a market (west), or conflated into a monopoly (egypt, mesopotamia.

    5) We do not believe, and the evidence is, marxists-postmodernist-feminists (and the feminine equalitarian mind in general) does not, possess the AGENCY (self awareness) to understand what they do, only what the experience and intuit and therefore seek to justify. It is inconceivable to a masculinist (conservative, aristocracy, meritocracy, reciprocity, loyalty, purity) how much time and effort marxist/postmodernist/feminist/ex-serf/slave (liberal, socialist, equalitarian, proportionality, individualist, devotional, impurist) worries about ‘being left behind’ (equality). Why? The pack can intuit the herd, but the herd can’t intuit the pack. Masculine Great Ape Packs, Female Great Ape Herds. And our minds (brains) are structured (evolved) for each bias.

    SO YES IT’S SIMPLE: IT DOESN’T MATTER WHAT EXCUSES YOU MAKE FOR THE ARGUMENTS, ACTIONS, AND OUTCOMES YOU ADVOCATE.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • The Scientist Is “the One Who Knocks”

    October 12th, 2018 9:54 AM THE SCIENTIST IS “THE ONE WHO KNOCKS”

    —“As a philosopher or theologian, how do you feel when scientists boldly venture into your field, making dogmatic statements? Should what is good for the goose also be good for the gander?”—- Quora User

    [W]ell, I’m an anti-philosophy Philosopher. I use the framework of philosophy (Aristotle’s Categories) and some of the terminology to undermine the sophistry so common in nearly all of philosophy; and I argue fairly frequently that philosophy shares more with religion’s sophism, conflation, fictionalism, and lack of external correspondence. In my understanding, I write Law (Testimony). Law requires tests of the logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal and complete (limits and full accounting). So law requires far more survival criteria than do logic, physical science, and the soft sciences of psychology and sociology. As I understand it, what I do is in fact, Science – if science consists of ‘necessary due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.’ I find plenty of folly in religion, literature, philosophy, economics, law, soft science, hard science, logic, and mathematics. So every field has it’s people who presume. And the reason they tend to presume is that they understand the FRAMES of just one discipline rather than either Frames of ALL disciplines, or the ONE frame that remains constant across all disciplines: Hypothesis, Due Diligence, Testimony, and Warranty. So while logic and mathematics can intrude on science, and science can intrude on philosophy, and philosophical rationalism can intrude on theology, the opposite cannot be true (ever). The reason being that what we can testify to decreases as we move from math, to logic, to science, to philosophy, to theology. And without testifiability we cannot make truth claims. Because that is what truth means: testimony that is consistent, correspondent, coherent, and complete. The universe is not complicated. It’s the host of little comforting lies we tell ourselves that cloud our reason, intuition, and comprehension. And so to borrow an edgy quote, I don’t fear a scientist knocking at my door. Because “I am the one who knocks”.

  • The Scientist Is “the One Who Knocks”

    October 12th, 2018 9:54 AM THE SCIENTIST IS “THE ONE WHO KNOCKS”

    —“As a philosopher or theologian, how do you feel when scientists boldly venture into your field, making dogmatic statements? Should what is good for the goose also be good for the gander?”—- Quora User

    [W]ell, I’m an anti-philosophy Philosopher. I use the framework of philosophy (Aristotle’s Categories) and some of the terminology to undermine the sophistry so common in nearly all of philosophy; and I argue fairly frequently that philosophy shares more with religion’s sophism, conflation, fictionalism, and lack of external correspondence. In my understanding, I write Law (Testimony). Law requires tests of the logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal and complete (limits and full accounting). So law requires far more survival criteria than do logic, physical science, and the soft sciences of psychology and sociology. As I understand it, what I do is in fact, Science – if science consists of ‘necessary due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit.’ I find plenty of folly in religion, literature, philosophy, economics, law, soft science, hard science, logic, and mathematics. So every field has it’s people who presume. And the reason they tend to presume is that they understand the FRAMES of just one discipline rather than either Frames of ALL disciplines, or the ONE frame that remains constant across all disciplines: Hypothesis, Due Diligence, Testimony, and Warranty. So while logic and mathematics can intrude on science, and science can intrude on philosophy, and philosophical rationalism can intrude on theology, the opposite cannot be true (ever). The reason being that what we can testify to decreases as we move from math, to logic, to science, to philosophy, to theology. And without testifiability we cannot make truth claims. Because that is what truth means: testimony that is consistent, correspondent, coherent, and complete. The universe is not complicated. It’s the host of little comforting lies we tell ourselves that cloud our reason, intuition, and comprehension. And so to borrow an edgy quote, I don’t fear a scientist knocking at my door. Because “I am the one who knocks”.

  • Democracy: a massive spoliation of resources from the producer

    October 12th, 2018 10:00 AM

    —“Democracy should be understood as an institutionalised collective crime and a massive spoliation of resources from the producers to the free riders: A vast pigouvian tax, but in a reverse sense.”—Jose Francisco Mayora

  • MEAN INFORMATION PROCESSING MACHINES —“Researchers discovered Asperger’s indiv

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025372LEAN MEAN INFORMATION PROCESSING MACHINES

    —“Researchers discovered Asperger’s individuals’ scores are much higher when they are evaluated by a test called Raven’s Progressive Matrices, which encompasses reasoning, novel problem-solving abilities, and high-level abstraction.

    By comparison, scores for non-Asperger’s individuals are much more consistent across different tests. Interestingly, Asperger participants’ performance on Raven’s Matrices was associated with their strongest peaks of performance on the traditional Wechsler.

    A previous study by the same group found very similar results for autistic individuals as well, whose peaks of ability are perceptual, rather than verbal as in Asperger individuals.

    This observation suggests that individuals with autism spectrum disorders have a common information processing mechanism for different aspects of information (verbal vs. perceptual).”—

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025372

    (h/t: @[100011784153824:2048:Drew Schibsted] )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 16:48:00 UTC

  • “Democracy should be understood as an institutionalised collective crime and a m

    —“Democracy should be understood as an institutionalised collective crime and a massive spoliation of resources from the producers to the free riders: A vast pigouvian tax, but in a reverse sense.”—José Francisco Mayora

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 14:00:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050748086245609473

  • RT @sbkaufman: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are with Robert Plomin (things start to g

    RT @sbkaufman: How DNA Makes Us Who We Are with Robert Plomin (things start to get feisty around the 53:00 mark) | The Psychology Podcast h…

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-12 13:23:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050738766929952768

  • (“All mammals die of accumulated cellular damage. Dominant males accumulate more

    (“All mammals die of accumulated cellular damage. Dominant males accumulate more cellular damage faster.”) https://twitter.com/PsychoSchmitt/status/1050528359971741696