—“Absolutism asserts a preference as a good and then justifies that preference with facts (fits the world around the individual). Scientific Law of Tort models the social world. With this knowledge, the polity asserts its good in the name of the state, and the individuals assert their will to power within those limits for fear of punishment.”—Nick Rosenthal
(genius)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 13:14:00 UTC
—“Talk won’t be so cheap if we make it expensive — I get that. However, are there opportunity costs with the restriction on supply? In other words, Is there profit in falsification and is it empirically verifiable? If these are opportunities to build collective equity in discourse “falsification” — opportunity throughput becomes relevant. Is resistance the price that must be paid for the extraction of “gains” in our quest to build collective knowledge? “— Rob Ellerman
Um. I am not sure exactly what you’re getting at…. More?
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 13:04:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45379023_10156755438262264_5420890494450270208_o_10156755438252264.jpg STEREOTYPES ARE THE NEXT “IQ” DEBATEJohn EdwardFor every individual who’s an exception to a stereotype, there’s someone who is that stereotype to the Nth degree. It balances out!Nov 4, 2018, 12:51 PMBill JoslinAnd why stereotypes are only accurate on the aggregate and not individual level.Nov 4, 2018, 12:55 PMVengefül BobmoranBy destroying the ability of various institutions to provide a more precise discrimination (degrees, diversity hires, section 8…), they are forcing us to fall back to the next best thing. Trying to push for equality increases our reliance on racial stereotypes.Nov 4, 2018, 1:41 PMCurt DoolittlesmartNov 4, 2018, 1:42 PMEthan Tricewe’re perfectly happy to accept broad generalizations like “smokers are likely to die young, therefore they have higher health insurance/life insurance premiums” or “young men are more dangerous drivers, so they have higher car insurance premiums” but as soon as you go into forbidden topics, then it’s suddenly inappropriate to generalize.Nov 4, 2018, 2:38 PMSaul SilverAddendum: for every individual who is an exception to a stereotype, there are plenty more who aren’t.Nov 4, 2018, 2:42 PMBill JoslinFor every individual who typifies one trait of a stereotype, they will deviate across other traits. It’s only across the aggregate that the stereotype fills out a definition and provides predictabilityNov 4, 2018, 2:45 PMVengefül BobmoranThey trick you into buying a universal principle, but they never adhere to it. They never reciprocate your sacrifice.
They are not against sexism.
They are not against racism.
They are not against theft.
They are not against genocide.
They are against you.Nov 4, 2018, 3:12 PMMark DossJust ask about NBA players and owners statisticsNov 4, 2018, 6:45 PMAndrew ParkerDespite making up less than half of the population….Nov 5, 2018, 11:31 AMSTEREOTYPES ARE THE NEXT “IQ” DEBATE
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:48:00 UTC
RT @Steve_Sailer: The biggest scientific accomplishment of psychology since 1900 has been IQ. Yet we are constantly told that IQ is a fraud…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:29:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059060068048617472
RT @ThomasSowell: “Barack Obama’s political genius is his ability to say things that will sound good to people who have not followed the is…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:28:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059059870601756673
RT @DegenRolf: Subjects don’t delight in being “richer” than others, but have a distaste for being “poorer”, with conservatives having a gr…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:26:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059059234174877696
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45351599_10156755169397264_6883728201957244928_o_10156755169392264.jpg ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF RESPONDING TO GSRMSDave NemedikDo you think that the lack of natural or artificial predation to our species contributes to more people exhibiting weakness? Like, if raptors, or perhaps bombs were more of an everyday threat in the US, and people had to focus more so on adapting to practical threats instead of manifesting imaginary problems, there would be less GSRMS present? Curt DoolittleNov 4, 2018, 10:52 AMCiaren CawleyWhy blot out the word female? Also I don’t think that censor algorithms operate on images.Nov 4, 2018, 10:55 AMAlex MackeyI liked it because it is true universally, female brain or not.Nov 4, 2018, 10:59 AMChristopher M MatthewsIt’s a female brain working these arguments even if it’s a male spitting them out.Nov 4, 2018, 11:07 AMCiaren CawleyIt’s simple. Aside from the xenoestrogens in foods, water and packaging that feminises men – exhibiting effeminate behaviour is incentivised by favourable portrayal in popular culture. Being weak and submissive is advertised as being sensitive and ‘in touch with one’s feelings’.
People have been perverted successfully to irrepairably compromise their biological imperatives and general survival instincts, in exchange for the mere simulation of praise, commendation and repute.
Imagine being susceptible to being flattered and bribed to deliberately worsen your quality of life, for the dopamine rush that media and social media afford. It’s quite sick to think of the process mechanically.Nov 4, 2018, 11:07 AMMartin ŠtěpánIt’s part of it, yes. When natural selection becomes mostly irrelevant, sexual selection starts playing much bigger role. Generally, it’s women doing the selection which is why you generally end up with males full of crazy colors and pointless ornaments. And when you alter female preferences with birth-control making them belive they want more feminine men, you’ll start getting more and more of them.Nov 4, 2018, 11:31 AMJennifer DeanWhat word is blacked out at the end?Nov 4, 2018, 11:39 AMJosey Wales“you don’t understand… the moment you speak” 👌🏻Nov 4, 2018, 12:44 PMMark DossHe will be villified by femalesNov 4, 2018, 6:32 PMMark DossAre we countering with GRSM attacks sometimes? Is it ever a good way to counter?Nov 4, 2018, 6:39 PMANOTHER EXAMPLE OF RESPONDING TO GSRMS
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 10:40:00 UTC
Bill Joslin “safety breeds folly” (which is why we must embrace and then tame our animal – not transcend it and leave it behind. )
Michael Hayes “To shield men from the effects folly is to fill the world with fools.”
Taleb: … Anti-fragile….
Nietzsche: … ‘what doesn’t kill us only makes us stronger’
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 10:02:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45420156_10156755021117264_1041177188688199680_o_10156755021107264.jpg photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/45332753_10156755021097264_2277589795217604608_o_10156755021087264.jpg BAD SPEECH IS CHEAPER THAN GOOD SPEECH
Only an equalitarian would ignore costs – as usual.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:32:00 UTC
RETURN TO OUR PRIMARY INDUSTRY: DOMESTICATION
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it.
Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:10:00 UTC