Form: Question

  • Why Can’t We Organize Society by Ideology, Philosophy, or Religion – instead of

    Why Can’t We Organize Society by Ideology, Philosophy, or Religion – instead of Law?

    πŸ˜‰ https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640821396774490115

  • Well, what is the difference between norm, consensus(Islam, judaism, continental

    Well, what is the difference between norm, consensus(Islam, judaism, continental), law (european), legislation(european), regulation(most), and commandor dictate(china)?

    What civilizations produce law? (only the west).

    Why? Trustworthiness. The question is, why are we…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 20:57:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640820310327930880

    Reply addressees: @EthanNeal322 @academicagenct

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640818936110301186

  • “Q: WHY WAS THERE, IS THERE, NO AGREEMENT ON ‘BEING LIBERTARIAN’” (As usual, the

    “Q: WHY WAS THERE, IS THERE, NO AGREEMENT ON ‘BEING LIBERTARIAN’”
    (As usual, the truth, and you won’t like it. Because you’re not a libertarian because you’re a good person. But because you’re just a lesser kind of bad person.) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640068867497009155

  • Q: “CURT: WHY DO WOMEN OFTEN PREFER EXOTIC MATES?” (the female operating system

    Q: “CURT: WHY DO WOMEN OFTEN PREFER EXOTIC MATES?”

    (the female operating system is trivially simple. But in the absence of multiple children is put to as ill-use, as the male operating system without responsibility to the group. Ergo, delayed reproduction, marriage, and household formation, in favor of hyperconsumption and tax production at the cost of population collapse is causing the current crisis – because we have exhausted the lingering effects of institutionalized marriage as an exchange between the sexes to solve that problem. )

    CAUSALITY: THE FEMALE BRAIN
    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping) ie: women can judge close genes with skill but not distant genes with skill.

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @cavaller_humil


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 17:54:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640049535698321408

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640006372770082816

  • Q: “CURT: WHY DO WOMEN OFTEN PREFER EXOTIC MATES?” (the female operating system

    Q: “CURT: WHY DO WOMEN OFTEN PREFER EXOTIC MATES?”

    (the female operating system is trivially simple. But in the absence of multiple children is put to as ill-use, as the male operating system without responsibility to the group. Ergo, delayed reproduction, marriage, and household formation, in favor of hyperconsumption and tax production at the cost of population collapse is causing the current crisis – because we have exhausted the lingering effects of institutionalized marriage as an exchange between the sexes to solve that problem. )

    CAUSALITY: THE FEMALE BRAIN
    1) OPPORTUNITY: Identification of novelties is easier (requires less skill) for the brain than excellences (requires more skill) -ie: children’s tastes vs adult tastes. (ie: shopping) ie: women can judge close genes with skill but not distant genes with skill.

    2) CONSUMPTION: The brain identifies novelties that are possible resources for consumption – as such drives our attention to novelties.

    3) HYPERCONSUMPTION: The female brain seeks hyper-consumption for status just as the male seeks hyper-capitalization for status. Acquisition(material loss aversion) and Status(opportunity loss aversion) drive all human priorities.

    4) ATTENTION: The female brain seeks attention because the female brain seeks successful manipulation by the capture of attention, using seduction (from subtle approval to sexual), to acquire hyper-consumption and status.

    5) RESPONSIBILITY EVASION: The female brain fears being wrong, rarely if ever admits error, casts itself as a victim, and avoids responsibility for its instincts, intuitions, and choices at all times. (neurosis)

    6) MAXIMUM UTILITY IN HYPERCONSUMPTION: Novelties, that do not require skill but just basal instincts, offer opportunities for consumption, for hyperconsumption, for status, for attention, for manipulation by seduction, where the female can’t be wrong, produce the greatest incentive available to women (other than defense of her young).

    7) SAFETY: Most women seek safety by maximizing hyperconsumption, hypergamy, social relations, and minimum responsibility, as such they can ‘feel, love, care’ without risk. Why? These traits minimize the risk to her and her offspring. However, in the absence of offspring this becomes what we see as female selfishness and anti-sociality, and in numbers, anti-civilizational warfare (feminism-woke).

    8) NEGATIVE SELECTION: (this might hurt): Men select women by neoteny (fertility, youth, symmetry, gracility, femininity), where women select AGAINST neoteny. In other words, men drive evolution toward human domestication, and women drive evolution toward human primitivization. This is why it’s important to teach women what a ‘good man’ is because otherwise they will ‘race to the bottom’ – at least the vast majority will do so. So again, men created civilization and partly by domesticating women as much as one another.

    That’s about the most accurate description of female behavior you will ever need to understand all female behavior regardless of context.

    Seriously.
    Women are really that simple.
    And yes, men are really wallet objects, and women are really sex objects, and it turns out evolution did that out of necessity. So we develop rituals and myths to romanticize and socialize and institutionalize what is otherwise just physics at work.

    But nature has an inescapable law: “We are not equal and He Who Breeds Wins.”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 17:54:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640049536771973120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640006372770082816

  • Well, sure. It’s by EMJ. πŸ˜‰ But is there a better work to recommend?

    Well, sure. It’s by EMJ. πŸ˜‰
    But is there a better work to recommend?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 17:01:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639673963402911745

    Reply addressees: @GaryClapton2005 @JDPARIZEE70 @enigma3078

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639669555566919680

  • INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES? Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and lite

    INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES?
    Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and literature, there is a difference between a good movie – entertaining and interesting, and a good mythology – deep and meaningful across time. Or what those of us in the last generation educated in the high arts call ‘high art’: mythology.

    And, I can’t really identify many.

    Certainly:
    2001 (new divinity, infinity)
    Blade Runner (life)
    Its a Wonderful Life (moral choice)
    Gone With The Wind (love amidst chaos)
    The Godfather (loyalty)
    Lawrence of Arabia (grand heroism)
    (ie: long time preference)

    And Maybe:
    Gladiator / Kingdom of Heaven (honor)
    Count of Monte Christo (dedication over time)
    Dances with Wolves (simplicity)
    Apocalypse Now / Saving Private Ryan / Full Metal Jacket / Platoon (war)
    No Country for Old Men (evil, the devil, temptation)
    (ie: aristocracy)

    And Not:
    I’ve come to understand the ‘mythology’ of 20th century literature, perhapse going back as far as Dickens, is largely the work of seditions by sympathizers with communism and socialism in their hatred of modernity – and not a contribution to western literary history. Just as the woke movement has destroyed western myth, literature, and entertainment since 2009. So while I want to recommend many other films, such as Citizen Kane as a work of cinematic innovation – thats all those otherwise great works might be.

    As in many things, this is a class thing. πŸ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist @EPoe187


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 01:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639433645864656900

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639401219281281024

  • INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES? Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and lite

    INTERESTING: WHICH MOVIES?
    Just as there is a difference betwen fiction and literature, there is a difference between a good movie – entertaining and interesting, and a good mythology – deep and meaningful across time. Or what those of us in the last generation educated in the high arts call ‘high art’: mythology.

    And, I can’t really identify many.

    Certainly:
    2001 (new divinity, infinity)
    Blade Runner (life)
    Its a Wonderful Life (moral choice)
    Gone With The Wind (love amidst chaos)
    The Godfather (loyalty)
    Lawrence of Arabia (grand heroism)
    (ie: long time preference)

    And Maybe:
    Gladiator / Kingdom of Heaven (honor)
    Count of Monte Christo (dedication over time)
    Dances with Wolves (simplicity)
    Apocalypse Now / Saving Private Ryan / Full Metal Jacket / Platoon (war)
    No Country for Old Men (evil, the devil, temptation)
    (ie: aristocracy)

    And Not:
    I’ve come to understand the ‘mythology’ of 20th century literature, perhapse going back as far as Dickens, is largely the work of seditions by sympathizers with communism and socialism in their hatred of modernity – and not a contribution to western literary history. Just as the woke movement has destroyed western myth, literature, and entertainment since 2009. So while I want to recommend many other films, such as Citizen Kane as a work of cinematic innovation – thats all those otherwise great works might be.

    As in many things, this is a class thing. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-25 01:06:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639433645994680324

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639401219281281024

  • JB: Shouldn’t enough recursion on enough competing predictions over enough time,

    JB: Shouldn’t enough recursion on enough competing predictions over enough time, eventually produce consciousness, if only to make choices?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 22:51:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639037205254381568

    Reply addressees: @Plinz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638836702801195010

  • I wonder how much of our knowledge – meaning those of us with sufficient IQ, suf

    I wonder how much of our knowledge – meaning those of us with sufficient IQ, sufficient disagreeablness, who are both informed, and have life experience, is due to having the TIME as well as the interest to maintain a body of knowledge to observe the patterns and recommend the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:11:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638528738576023552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638523625379889152