Why isn’t ratio-scientific man an interregnum between timid aggressive man and hyper aggressive man? Why do we fail to pacify them?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 04:51:00 UTC
Why isn’t ratio-scientific man an interregnum between timid aggressive man and hyper aggressive man? Why do we fail to pacify them?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 04:51:00 UTC
Why isn’t subsaharan Africa or Arab or steppe aggression+IQ a superior evolutionary strategy? East and West resisting them for millennia.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-13 04:50:00 UTC
Did the protests of the 50’s and 60’s advance racial equality? What did they achieve? With what externalities?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-12 15:28:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708676054282592256
Reply addressees: @ggreenwald @ThomasEWoods
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708665934941200384
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/708665934941200384
Please explain to my why the Italians can design a car but not build one while the Japanese can build but not design one.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-10 08:46:00 UTC
Q: HOW DO CUSTOMERS REACT TO YOUR PHILOSOPHICAL WORK?
—“You’re an entrepreneur and a scholar who goes to places like TRS and now RIR and you say what you say and you don’t hide your identity. It takes balls. Great to have people like you on our side.”—-
This is a great question.
1) in my experience customers are willing to pay people who will tell them the truth regardless of their personal political biases. In my case, I have found the fact that I am a radical to be a positive influence with my customers.
2) When dealing with my customers I act entirely in their interest using my skills and the only way my political preferences enter into the customer relationship is that I will not engage in anything I find immoral. Which again tends to be beneficial for customers.
3) In advertising, marketing, and customer experience (the web), the truth spoken elegantly and succinctly is attractive for both merchant and consumer. And my emphasis on truth helps that.
4) You probably notice that I don’t hate ANYBODY. I view problems as philosophical, informational, and institutional not personal. I don’t discount people’s feelings, or their interests, or their agendas. I just go with what makes people engage in mutually beneficial cooperation regardless. My solutions are all matters of voluntary cooperation.
5) When I go on very nationalist shows or very racist shows, I tend to be the voice of moderation rather than criticism. If you ask me why others have their behaviors I don’t say that they’re bad, I say only that we must defend against immoral and unbeneficial behaviors.
6) What most customers seem to feel is this: “he will fight for me if I am right. he solves my problems. he is unstoppable. He will make us more money. He will help advance my career. And if he is that truthful in public he is going to be that truthful with me.”
7) I have very few direct relationships with customers. Most of the time I solve the initial problem, and the staff maintains the relationship and performs the work. If it is a strategy question I will run the strategy sessions (requirements gathering). And I will often help with design. But I find my greatest value is in gathering the truth from the customer in a way that it is inescapable, and then using the truth to sell the rest of the organization on it. So it’s not like customers get to spend a lot of time talking to me. In fact, it’s more common that they are overly concerned with using my time.
I have only had one negative experience, and it was from a woman when I made the statement on my personal blog that all women are beautiful and desirable as long as they can keep the weight off. Well, the problem is, that it’s true. I told the customer and my sales staff, that its’ my job and our job to speak the truth, because that is what the consumer wants. If something is true, it just is true. Knowing the truth we must discover some way to make use of it. But we cannot ever escape the truth without creating more problems than we solve.
So while I am sure there are people who are disinclined to hire a conservative libertarian, or someone willing to get into tough discussions, I am only interested in those customers that want to use the truth in advertising, marketing, and experience to forge better relationships with customers for mutual gain.
And as a specialist in truth, incentive and exchange, I kind of doubt I will run out of customers interested in truth, incentive and mutually beneficial exchange.
Because that is what the world wants from big corporations that can afford to pay guys like me to solve their problems: they want the truth. it can be spun one way or another, but it must be true.
Curt.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-09 04:37:00 UTC
Does it mean that you think christianity can be restored? Or is there some meaning to attache to “Reaction”?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 20:28:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707301928724787200
Reply addressees: @soapjackal @retroch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707295183709216768
IN REPLY TO:
@soapjackal
@retroch @curtdoolittle this was the turn that made me stop reading his blog. I’ll still wait for the book.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707295183709216768
Just out of curiosity, what do you refer to with ‘turn’? I’ve had the headline “a radical” for years.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 20:27:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707301767034363906
Reply addressees: @soapjackal @retroch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707295183709216768
IN REPLY TO:
@soapjackal
@retroch @curtdoolittle this was the turn that made me stop reading his blog. I’ll still wait for the book.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/707295183709216768
http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings/worldwide-caution.htmlSomeone want to tell me how this can be interpreted in any other terms than that we are at war with the islamic nations who allow this export to survive?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 14:31:00 UTC
Lets assume that there are a hundred couples in the world that have a deformed baby today. What percent of men would agree to euthenize it. What percent of women would agree to euthenize it. Every career policeman will tell you that by the age of 8 they can tell you if a child will be a criminal or not. If at the age of 8, how many fahters would agree and how many mothers? If at the age of 14 the son comitted an act of deceit, theft, violence, or conspiracy, how many fathers would see the boy as bad and in need of correction and how many mothers would justify his behavior and blame others for it. If at the age of 22 a young man commits an act of terrorism, how many fathers will deny he could do it, and how many mothers would deny it? If at the age of 35 a man is caught as a serial killer, then how many fathers would deny it, and how may mothers would deny it? If at the age of 40 it becomes clear that there will be either war or conquest will require great sacrifice from the family what percent of men will carry it and what percent of women?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-08 11:04:00 UTC
Do you read Scott Adams’ blog? He does some good work, and then he says things like this which seems like something you’d say:
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-06 07:30:00 UTC