Form: Question

SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT: CHURCH AND ARISTOCRACY?

So the conservative(eugenic, meritocratic) movement is still divided into:

CHURCH(Priest/Morality/family) : Gossip/Shaming/Rallying BURGHER(Merchant/Money/production) : Trade/Payment AND ARISTOCRACY(Warriors/Law/defense) : Violence/Limits

With the Christian Conservatives, the Libertarians, and the Military Aristocracy?

Why do we need a conflict between those ideologies and languages?

We evolved a market for the trade between our divisions. Why do we not return to a market?

Why don’t we divide our profits from commons commerce and trade evenly by house, and within house by person, and policy by the same?

Why does the classical liberal project that sought to take power from the church and aristocracy have some claim to monopoly of control over the commons?

We can reverse the errors of liberalism without reversing its advancements. Why don’t we have houses for each class?

Why don’t we return to a market for the commons where the division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy between the classes and genders?

There is no reason. Except that all the rent seekers and thieves are more interested in preserving their parasitism than in returning to a market for commons that computes the truth of the good rather than uses lies to create lies that produce the bad that we live under.

Western man’s institutions perform like a great calculator of transcendence. All others perform like a great calculator of stagnation.

WHY? WESTERN MAN HAS A GENETIC BIAS TOWARD OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE. AND THE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO MAKE USE OF IT. AND HE FORCED THESE BIASES INTO HIS INSTITUTIONS.