Form: Question

  • Is external correspondence (repeatable experiment) sufficient for a truth claim?

    Is external correspondence (repeatable experiment) sufficient for a truth claim? (no) Why not? Is non contradiction a thought exp?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-17 04:58:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/809986163251494912

    Reply addressees: @Kiarip

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/809985530444337152


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/809985530444337152

  • What’s Your Position on UBI (Welfare 2.0)?

    WHAT’S YOUR POSITION ON UBI (WELFARE)? (I HAVE ONE.

    🙂

  • What’s Your Position on UBI (Welfare 2.0)?

    WHAT’S YOUR POSITION ON UBI (WELFARE)? (I HAVE ONE.

    🙂

  • WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL? For cri

    WHAT SHALL BE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S PUNISHMENT FOR THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL?

    For crimes against humanity, against western civilization, against the united states of america, what shall be the punishment for Columbia University?

    1) Sponsorship of a Natural Law School and Degree?

    2) “Cornell Style” Forcible Restructuring of Curriculum and Staff?

    3) Total Purge of Staff and Replacement?

    4) Closure, Destruction, And Prosecution?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-06 08:18:00 UTC

  • All human action is an attempt to satisfy a human desire. Creating and consuming

    All human action is an attempt to satisfy a human desire.

    Creating and consuming art fulfills a desire.

    What desire is being fulfilled?

    In a population what demand is being satisfied?

    The subjective value of an operation is created by achieving a result, not in the operation itself. The value to OTHERS in articulating operations, is that they as ‘names’ or ‘referents’ they are insulated from bias and suggestion – especially when compared to INTENTIONAL or EXPERIENTIAL descriptions.

    So the value of operations in themselves is contained in the achievement of an end by the actor.

    The value of speaking in a sequence of operations is contained in the improvement of truth content, over intentional and experiential descriptions. The value is that by eliminating intent and experience and error, bias, suggestion, and deceit, we purify the information transferred in the process we call ‘the communication of meaning’.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 17:01:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CURT, WHAT IS A GOOD SOURCE OF NEWS???” —“Can you recommend a good sourc

    Q&A: “CURT, WHAT IS A GOOD SOURCE OF NEWS???”

    —“Can you recommend a good source of news? I mostly read the Economist; neoliberal assumptions aside it’s weighty and thorough.”— Trent Fowler

    Interesting question that I can answer on multiple levels.

    1) Every source of news is ‘good’ if you know what they’re lying about (their bias).

    When I hear news, I don’t take it on face value as a statement of honest moral intent, but I take every single news item i read as a lie of some sort, if for no other reason than it’s stated with sufficient confidence to get your opinion: ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseodorationalism, pseudoscience and deceit.

    So all news is good news if you realize its all lies and you’re looking for possible half-truth candidates by combining enough stories across enough outlets that you can figure out the rational intentions of the people who are being reported upon.

    2) I tend to read this web site every single day: www.rtable.net/index/rt/economics/recent/ Understanding that professors in the academy are always biased toward globalism and think the academy is a good thing instead of the problem.

    I read stratfor, understanding that it’s got a neocon bias.

    I tend to read the Forbes blogs.

    I read the WSJ

    I read pretty much any new paper that’s mentioned on SSRN.

    I let other people SELECT news for me (I follow people on twitter)

    3) But here is the trick. You get to the point where you have enough information, that really, you are rarely learning anything new. Because man isn’t new. Man’s thousands of years old. And all that happens over time is that we make things cheaper, and our speech gets more complex. But otherwise we’re the same as we were when we built the first villages and cities.

    I think news cannot be understood unless history is understood. So I would read my suggested reading list before I would worry about the news. News is just gossip.

    History and science will be the NEWS to you, until you run out of news when reading history and science.

    And you will run out of news once you see it’s just a long history of repetitions of cycles.

    And that’s the most profound thing I can tell you.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 13:47:00 UTC

  • 150 years of pseudoscience.If we can require warranty of performance of goods an

    150 years of pseudoscience.If we can require warranty of performance of goods and services,why not education and information?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 02:44:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804879002905309184

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801580876148543488


    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    Anthropology’s search for scientific truth marches on, impartial and unafraid. https://t.co/QQLAWySPDB https://t.co/W97YTvSCVF

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801580876148543488

  • And the stronger the case for restriction of reproduction of those requiring red

    And the stronger the case for restriction of reproduction of those requiring redistribution,right? That’s the causal problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 02:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804877071331815424

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804414883898851328


    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    The higher the heritability of qualities determining success, the stronger the case for redistribution. As noted in The Bell Curve, BTW. https://t.co/nFirLLwXRo

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804414883898851328