Form: Question
-
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz. -
(to paul krugman via twitter) What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capi
(to paul krugman via twitter)
What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 22:09:00 UTC
-
What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic p
What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:20:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968838235374923777
Reply addressees: @paulkrugman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059
IN REPLY TO:
@paulkrugman
Merchants of death watch, more or less literally: the reason FedEx won’t drop its special deals with the NRA is that it makes a lot of money shipping guns https://t.co/3Fd4HnXV3J
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059
-
JEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi )
JEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi ) -
JEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi )
JEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi ) -
THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( @[1009658288:2048:Jean Bar
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/why-finland-is-tearing-down-walls-in-schools?utm_content=buffera3adb&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=bufferJEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( @[1009658288:2048:Jean Barresi] )
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/why-finland-is-tearing-down-walls-in-schools?utm_content=buffera3adb&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-20 08:41:00 UTC
-
THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi )
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/why-finland-is-tearing-down-walls-in-schools?utm_content=buffera3adb&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=bufferJEAN, THOUGHTS? HOW WOULD ‘NO CLASSROOM’ EFFECT TEACHING? ( Jean Barresi )
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-20 08:41:00 UTC
-
Do You Believe Your Political Views Are Objective Or Subjective?
As far as I know, and the research is increasingly conclusive, your political preference is 80% genetic. Just like everything else you think and feel.
The blank slate is a lie, and dunning kruger constrains all but the few.
https://www.quora.com/Do-you-believe-your-political-views-are-objective-or-subjective
-
Who Are The Leading Scholars/experts On Human Stupidity?
(You know, it’s very hard to find research on Via-Negativa subjects. Books on Lying and Deceit are laughable. Books on dishonest argument are positioned as the study of error. Works on intellectual fraud (marx, freud, boaz), are positioned as analysis of error rather than deception. Works on stupidity are actively suppressed, and work on intelligence is only slightly less suppressed.)
(See current month’s nature. I just took 100 cites from the article on the (genetic) heritability of intelligence.)
https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-leading-scholars-experts-on-human-stupidity
-
Who Are The Leading Scholars/experts On Human Stupidity?
(You know, it’s very hard to find research on Via-Negativa subjects. Books on Lying and Deceit are laughable. Books on dishonest argument are positioned as the study of error. Works on intellectual fraud (marx, freud, boaz), are positioned as analysis of error rather than deception. Works on stupidity are actively suppressed, and work on intelligence is only slightly less suppressed.)
(See current month’s nature. I just took 100 cites from the article on the (genetic) heritability of intelligence.)
https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-leading-scholars-experts-on-human-stupidity