Form: Question

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Trump. 1) Shutdown, 2) Judicial Appointments.

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Trump. 1) Shutdown, 2) Judicial Appointments. Is that the idea?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-31 03:22:52 UTC

  • Trump. 1) Shutdown, 2) Judicial Appointments. Is that the idea?

    Trump. 1) Shutdown, 2) Judicial Appointments. Is that the idea?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 23:22:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hyp

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“As a conservative, would you prefer a hypothetical effeminate capitalist society or a hypothetical masculine socialist society?”—

    STRANGE QUESTION – THE CORRECT ANSWER

    Hmmm…. Socialism(equality) is the result of the female reproductive strategy, and capitalism(markets) is the result of a young (ascendent) male reproductive strategy, and classical liberalism(hierarchy) is the result of the established male reproductive strategy, and authoritarianism (command) regardless of redistributive, market, or extractive, is the result of dominant male reproductive strategy. As far as I know fascism has won the postwar competition as the means of rule, and markets as the means of production, and redistribution as the means of gaining the publics permission to rule. All nations of any scale are now fascists (intolerant) mixed economies, with minor variations in corruption and liberty.

    https://www.quora.com/As-a-conservative-would-you-prefer-a-hypothetical-effeminate-capitalist-society-or-a-hypothetical-masculine-socialist-society/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=418aaf6d&srid=u4Qv


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 13:11:30 UTC

  • —“Curt, What Is Your Proposal for Government?”–

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/
    Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/ A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/ COMMON QUESTIONS (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public. (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice. (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations. (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise. LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW The Natural Law of Reciprocity. A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’) LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR) Monarchy Cabinet (Management Team) LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH) Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons … Territorial, and of classes. LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS) Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.
  • —“Curt, What Is Your Proposal for Government?”–

    https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/
    Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/ A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/ COMMON QUESTIONS (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public. (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice. (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations. (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise. LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW The Natural Law of Reciprocity. A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’) LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR) Monarchy Cabinet (Management Team) LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH) Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons … Territorial, and of classes. LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS) Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.
  • WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”– Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (sho

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/—“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Great question.

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/

    COMMON QUESTIONS

    (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public.

    (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice.

    (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations.

    (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise.

    LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity.

    A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’)

    LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR)

    Monarchy

    Cabinet (Management Team)

    LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH)

    Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons

    … Territorial, and of classes.

    LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS)

    Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:50:00 UTC

  • WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”– Great question. PERFECT GOVERNMENT (sho

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/—“CURT, WHAT IS YOUR PROPOSAL FOR GOVERNMENT?”–

    Great question.

    PERFECT GOVERNMENT (short)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/perfect-government-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PERFECT GOVERNMENT (longer)

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/30/a-short-course-in-perfect-government/

    COMMON QUESTIONS

    (a) checks and balances are performed via the courts, since individuals and groups can provide suit against anyone whatsoever, in matters private or public.

    (b) the monarch can only veto. Veto is a simple process and if law is too complicated it’s veto-able on that grounds alone. So there is no need for specific legal skill. We have jurists for that – it’s not like a monarch cannot ask advice.

    (c) The monarchy in my work is very similar to constitutional monarchy (ceo). Except that they have a lot of intergenerational interests and obligations.

    (d) commons do not use enumerated shares (quantities). In that sense citizens can never have more than one ‘share’ in the commons. Secondly, like any corporation, common shareholders (citizens) only have certain powers. In our case, it’s the franchise.

    LAYER 1) RULE OF LAW

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity.

    A professional Judiciary (‘judicial priesthood’)

    LAYER 2) FASCISM (IN TIMES OF WAR)

    Monarchy

    Cabinet (Management Team)

    LAYER 3) REPUBLIC (IN TIMES OF GROWTH)

    Houses “Juries” for Necessary Commons

    … Territorial, and of classes.

    LAYER 4) DIRECT DEMOCRACY (IN TIMES OF WINDFALLS)

    Direct Choice of Preferential Commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 15:50:00 UTC

  • Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:40:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020680015606960128

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling fami

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Ok. So imagine this. Every city dwelling family and most suburban families have a ‘country house’, even if it’s just a garden shed, or a cottage, and a couple of acres of land.

    How does that change the way of life?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 14:40:41 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post. (any chance this is legit?)

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    (any chance this is legit?)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-20 11:43:02 UTC