Well, given i) faith, ii) belief, iii) theory, iv) guess. What is the difference between those terms?
Supernatural faith, philosophical belief, and scientific theory, ordinary language ‘guess’.
What’s the difference?
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-26 15:00:00 UTC
CREATING THE HIGH-DISGUST PERSONALITY BIAS
(pls discuss)
by Anne Summers
I would argue 2 things… Abrahamic religions are attractive to, and create high disgust personalities. It’s the high disgust, low tolerance mind set that will “win the day”.
(“The Most Intolerant Always Wins”)
Abrahamic religions aren’t the problem, from looking at it from your point of view, it’s the high tolerance nature of the European.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-26 10:55:00 UTC
—“[List of developments under christianity]”—
^ Someone want to identify and explain this logical fallacy?
In other words, (a) range of choices under monopoly religion, (b) because of -vs- in spite of, (c) rates prior and after vs rates during, (d) evidence of demilitarization and feminization to the point of indefensibility (e) evidence of mandated illiteracy, (f) evidence of capital sequestration and rents, (g) rate of development after restoration of pre-abrahamic thought. (h) rate of development after defunding and disempowering the church, (i) rate of development after restoring literacy, (j) rate of development after de-sequestration of capital…. I mean, and the post darwinian collapse of a church unable and unwilling to reform (k) and the greater remaining corruption by longer under the church (l) the church’s movement to prey upon third worlders that they can ‘fool’ rather than reform to serve the european people. the church institutionalized semitic corruption.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-24 10:56:00 UTC
Bob, Serious question. What bias or biases do you suggest drive Krugman’s propagandism? I spent a few months looking into it in 09, but I think you have a deeper understanding…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-18 00:38:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063954479601643521
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063842693804158977
IN REPLY TO:
@BobMurphyEcon
“After further review, the ruling on the field stands. Krugman’s post makes no sense whatsoever.” https://t.co/NQv9DAJlTP
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1063842693804158977
NEAR ZERO CONSUMER INTEREST
1) let’s assume there is only one consumer lender: the treasury. what happens to default rates?
And 2) under single (consumer) lender, with limits by rolling income, why are defaults a problem?
And 3) now let’s distribute liquidity via those same accounts, and what happens?
And (4) if those ‘rents’ on state-secured interest aren’t available where does investment capital seek longer term returns instead?
With the exception that;
(5) black market ‘loan’ might increase (not for sizable), because there is always an unpredictable ‘lottery payment’ coming from insertion of liquidity to maintain the money supply, with zero delay.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-17 12:04:00 UTC
COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY
What degree of indirection is required in order to produce new networks (routes) that attached different weights (emotions, values) to the same (similar) phenomenon?
EXPERIENTIAL TERMS (Neurological)
“Just tell me”
“Just show me “
“let me have a little distance, so I can learn by analogy”
“I can’t go anywhere near it, so I have to learn ENTIRELY by suggestion.”
LOGICAL TERMS
Some things are self evident. (just tell me)
Some requires a bit of analysis (just show me)
Some requires some deduction (just let me have distance…)
Some requires inference. (can’t go there, need suggestion….)
MATHEMATICAL TERMS
Numbers
Addition
Geometry
Algebraic Geometry
Same problem. Same Solution.
Literary suggestion using archetypes combines the possibility of SUGGESTION combined with SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF,
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-14 10:26:00 UTC
what theory is NOT storytelling? The subatomic particles? how about newtonian gravity? what about the evolution of cooperation? What about the evolution of the law? What can yu tell me about anything that ISN”T as story?
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 00:10:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062135495600300032
Reply addressees: @Race__Realist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062132945715126272
IN REPLY TO:
@Race__Realist
@curtdoolittle The only thing I claimed to “know” is that EP is nothing but a storytelling enterprise with no independent verification for any hypothesis.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062132945715126272
I want a platform where I can openly discuss a revolution to restore the constitution. On what platform is that possible?
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-12 01:43:33 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/9040581340850338
how many people died in the civil rights movement? how many in the arab spring? How many in in the irish resistance?
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 17:56:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060591957058207745
Reply addressees: @readomain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060582798946377728
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060582798946377728
Um. You know. If i asked you “How would you go about creating a value-neutral, cross-disciplinary, fully commensurable language that could survive in court under testimony in all matters of conflict.”, I’ll bet you can’t even begin to imagine where to start and how to go about it.
So yeah, that’s Propertarianism (or that’s the spectrum within Propertarianism, including vitruvianism->metaphysics, acquisitionism->psychology, compatibilism->sociology, propertarianism->ethics, testimonialism->epistemology, and algorithmic natural law->politics). And it includes reformation of every one of the grammars (disciplines).
So of COURSE you aren’t going to understand THAT LANGUAGE off the bat. You aren’t going to understand how to convert from IDEAL language (pretense of knowledge) we use today to REAL language (demonstrating knowledge).
Worse you are not going to understand how to convert your thinking from simple human scale justification, to post human scale via negativa falsification, and finally into well formed statements in operational language.
So please don’t waste my time until you catch up to the people who HAVE done so.
Ok. Yeah. Thanks. sigh…
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 15:16:00 UTC