Form: Question

  • yes but how do you establish duty in the first place?

    yes but how do you establish duty in the first place?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 15:45:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096435258373955585

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113

  • this is the ‘german thing’ I want to understand – how do germans learn this (bec

    this is the ‘german thing’ I want to understand – how do germans learn this (become indoctrinated into this). As far as I know it’s entirely cultural. But maybe education?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 13:19:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096398641504358400

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096348311248928768


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096348311248928768

  • What is fascism except radical intolerance for crimes against your people?

    What is fascism except radical intolerance for crimes against your people?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 19:44:00 UTC

  • Who has the religious side of the alt right?

    Who has the religious side of the alt right?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 19:04:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096123089413320704

  • What Are the Legit Crits of Prop? (One More Time!!!)

    WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!) 2019-02-14

    —“Curt: honest question: What are the faults/weaknesses to propertarianism? I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.”—

    Um. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few. They are all reducible to:

    1. Its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. It is. The more I undrestand it myself, the more I understand that this scale of thing has only happened three other times in history. But people want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism. It’s not an ideology. it’s the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to all human thought, embodiment in the law, and means of restoring our civilization.
    2. People want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.

    3. Jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.

    4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.

    5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.

    6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )

    As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever. THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS … are listed in Section 3 Here: https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264

  • DOES P REQUIRE INNATE ABILITY? —“The relevance, of course, is that if the abil

    DOES P REQUIRE INNATE ABILITY?

    —“The relevance, of course, is that if the ability to do programming, in general, is not learnable, but relies on innate facility, then neither should we think that P is broadly learnable, but rather, it relies on innate facility.”—Matt Evans


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 15:03:00 UTC

  • WHO IS THE ALT RIGHT LEADER OF THE CHRISTIANS? Let’s try again. Of the alt-right

    WHO IS THE ALT RIGHT LEADER OF THE CHRISTIANS?

    Let’s try again. Of the alt-right personalities, who has the religious side of the alt right?

    Or to be more direct: who can I direct people to when the are moved by the divine rather than science and reason?

    Or to be more direct: if I want to stop bashing christians and just send them to ‘their sponsor’ who is that?

    The only one I know of is Vox Day.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 14:04:00 UTC

  • WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!) —“Curt: honest question:

    WHAT ARE THE LEGIT CRITS OF PROP? (One More Time!!!)

    —“Curt: honest question: What are the faults/weaknesses to propertarianism? I am a supporter but no human system is perfect and would like to know that you have thought out how to beat your own plan and what are the counters to slow or stop those from happening. Keep up the good work. Thanks if you respond.”—

    Um. I publish legit criticisms all the time. There are a few.

    They are all reducible to:

    1. Its big, complex, deep, and hard to learn. It is. The more I undrestand it myself, the more I understand that this scale of thing has only happened three other times in history. But people want something simple-stupid like libertarianism or progressivism. It’s not an ideology. it’s the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to all human thought, embodiment in the law, and means of restoring our civilization.

    2. People want a political ideology, religion, or secular religion (philosophy) and prop is simply science and law, with ADVICE on religion and secular religion.

    3. Jewish, christian, islamic religion do not come off very well, and I have not found a way to accommodate christian mysticism.

    4. Everyone wants a monopoly (religion, authoritarianism, fascism, anarchism) when we must use each of these components in every society – we cannot have a monopoly on any of them. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred way of organizing society – i use all of them.

    5. I suggest a few methods of governing across various peoples and various conditions with the law being the only constant. People want me to take a stand on THEIR preferred order. I use what is required.

    6. I am an unabashed elitist working in favor of my people, but other than knowing what is good for my people, I do not consider their understanding of the world very valuable. Only the set of demands they have, not their way of satisfying them. ( I do not claim to be a good, a moral, or decent person or anything of the sort, I only claim I am correct. God knows I’ve made the same mistakes everyone else has. )

    As far as I know there are no extant criticisms of the work itself and it will be extremely unlikely such things will arise other than in nuances. This is revolutionary and once you understand it your life will be changed forever.

    THE COMMON LEGIT CRITS

    … are listed in Section 3 Here:

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156982914672264


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-14 09:54:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51968949_10156982798812264_260438863

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51968949_10156982798812264_260438863

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51968949_10156982798812264_2604388634090012672_o_10156982798792264.jpg Serg GioCan you really build the West with Non-Westerners?Feb 13, 2019, 5:09 AMCurt DoolittleAll men who build nations for their peoples are brothers in arms against globalists.Feb 13, 2019, 9:44 AMCurt Doolittleso no. wrong question.Feb 13, 2019, 9:45 AMSerg GioCurt Doolittle We are brothers indeed. I just hope whites will have an exclusive homeland, so that we can survive in a long term.Feb 13, 2019, 11:09 AMCurt Doolittleit is not a matter of hope. it is a matter of choice. so choose.Feb 13, 2019, 11:59 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 21:03:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52387430_10156982779097264_950542190

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52387430_10156982779097264_950542190

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52387430_10156982779097264_950542190352793600_o_10156982779092264.jpg Serg GioDid we (Europeans) over-paicified ourselves and passed “sweet spot” of IQ-testosterone optimal rate?Feb 13, 2019, 5:23 AMNoah J RevoyI could bring about world peace tomorrow, if only I could figure out how to dispose of so many bodies.Feb 13, 2019, 6:41 AMCurt Doolittleculturally not physcallyFeb 13, 2019, 9:19 AMAnne SummersThere is more equality of peace with arms than white flags.Feb 13, 2019, 9:59 AMChristopher M MatthewsWood chippers and steamrollers could be effective.Feb 13, 2019, 10:52 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 20:58:00 UTC