Form: Question

  • ??? Not sure I understand Kate. I understand the woman problem. I understand som

    ??? Not sure I understand Kate. I understand the woman problem. I understand some partial fixes, but what are you seeing or predicting that I am not? If you could make a case it would be an innovation beneficial for all. (And I am aware that you are counter to stereotype in…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 02:48:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751074574651867301

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751017897705529568

  • CD: QUESTIONS – How do you envision the practical implementation of these reform

    CD: QUESTIONS
    – How do you envision the practical implementation of these reforms in existing legal and constitutional frameworks?
    – What challenges do you foresee in translating complex scientific and cognitive insights into operational legal principles?
    – How do you assess the potential impact of these changes on the broader socio-political landscape, especially in terms of conflict resolution and societal stability?

    CURTD
    I don’t believe there is any difficulty translating scientific and cognitive insights into operational egal principles. It requires first creating a universally commensurable paradigm, vocabular and logic with which to unify the physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal (logical) sciences. Doolittle has done that with universal commensurability in operational language.

    So there is really just one universal principle to all of existence and it simply expands as theh complexity of matter from the merely physical to conscious life to the systems of cooperation between complex conscious life.

    As such all existence is operationally reducible, even if we do not yet know enough to reduce it to that first principle.

    As for the potential impact, the population takes about a decade for any change in the law to percolate down through the courts, legislature, bureaucracy, economy society, famly, and individual as a set of biases or rules at their scale of competency and influence.

    So this would take about a decade to propagate down. And I think it would provide mindfulness and clarity to a confused and stressed population.

    However there are vast sections of our population that are engaged in one form of free riding, rent seeking, corruption, conspiracy sedition or worse, and they are largely in the academic, media, state, and financial sectors – very privileged folk because of the permissibility of their criminality.

    So I would expect many people in those sectors to resist reforms that would prevent their currently ‘tolerated’ crimes.

    GPT
    Your perspective on translating scientific and cognitive insights into operational legal principles through a universally commensurable paradigm is both intriguing and ambitious. Curt Doolittle’s approach, as you describe it, seeks to integrate various disciplines using a universal principle expanded through operational language. This paradigm appears to aim for a comprehensive and unified understanding of existence, from physical phenomena to complex social interactions.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:41:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751012398033436672

  • So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is

    So let me ask an odd question. Why is there such a prohibiton on debate? Or, is it that there is only a prohibition on that debate’s visibility beyond the leadership?

    Why is dissent so feared and response to it so intolerant?

    I mean, I quite honestly can’t really imagine it.…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:21:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751007530472370654

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751005697217798366

  • Hmmm… how do we know the liars paradox is always false using a syllogism? Whil

    Hmmm… how do we know the liars paradox is always false using a syllogism? While operational prose it’s quite simple.

    Do you know why? The reducibility of linguistic sets is smaller than the reducibility of mathematical calculations is smaller than the reducibility of…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 20:32:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750979993058828380

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750976897700220947

  • @SRCHicks Can we fit the Epicureans into this sequence? Because that social, lif

    @SRCHicks Can we fit the Epicureans into this sequence? Because that social, lifestyle, within-your-means, quality of life bit (middle) sits between the personal (small) and the political (large) and as far as I know the disintegration of that ‘middle’ by the postwar march… https://twitter.com/SRCHicks/status/1746632891906335160


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-22 15:45:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749458231649337736

  • GREAT QUESTION? ADVICE FROM OTHERS PLS? —“If a young American man early 20s wa

    GREAT QUESTION? ADVICE FROM OTHERS PLS?
    —“If a young American man early 20s wanted to learn the type of law you write about in your tweets, should he go to law school?”—

    Hmmm…. I think you’d want to learn my work first and THEN study law if you decided on a career as a lawyer. Learn what’s true first and then what we have instead second. It’s harder to relearn if you ‘learn it wrong’ in the first place, so learn it right in the first place. 😉

    In college, to learn the same material, you’d want to study cognitive science, behavioral economics, micro, institutional economics and political economy, economic history, history as comparative civilization, and the philosophy of science, and at least one semester of simple programming to get a feel for the logic.

    But in my opinion you’ll be able to take the course from us sooner than you’ll get through courses elsewhere. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 00:11:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748860850868228097

  • (Question) HYPOTHESIS? (Sex Differences in Cognition) What if we reframe the fem

    (Question)
    HYPOTHESIS? (Sex Differences in Cognition)

    What if we reframe the feminine > jewish > abrahamic > marxist-to-woke sequence as a cognitive bias in favor of social construction (demand-positiva) rather than mere magical thinking?
    In other words, did the female-to-feminine brain evolve to social construction rather than individual and political discernment (supply-negativa).
    And have we been thinking about the problem of the feminine mind incorrectly because all of substantive historical thought presumes the male-to-masculine brain’s bias to the evidentiary and empircal ‘what is and what can I do with or about it?’.
    Is our civilizational cognitively masculine bias preventing us from observing the causality of the female-to-feminine mind as a simple demand generator vs the male supply generator?
    If this is the case then the feminine mind isn’t so much defective compared to the masculine, but serving an entirely opposite purpose – and that we are failing to regulate it’s application to political ‘is’ vs social ‘wants’?

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 16:48:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746937421894221824

  • (Movie Silliness) Just wondering. In all these ancient and medieval movies there

    (Movie Silliness)
    Just wondering. In all these ancient and medieval movies there are all these torches – in cellars, dungeons and caves. I mean, in reality, who the heck made and maintained these torches? They only burn for ten minutes to two hours at the longest.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 03:18:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746733542564835833

  • The better question is, that (a) why was einstein half wrong in his magical cons

    The better question is, that (a) why was einstein half wrong in his magical construction of space-time (b) why do jewish thinkers dominate the pseudosciences, and in particular the evolutionary, anthropological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as the irrational…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 03:09:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746731318568681550

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746542150714794215

  • IS THE WEST NOW THE WORLD’S ENEMY? (Sort of. But that’s throwing the baby out wi

    IS THE WEST NOW THE WORLD’S ENEMY?
    (Sort of. But that’s throwing the baby out with the bathwater)

    –“Is Dugin correct that the US/West has become the “common enemy” of mankind in its desire to dilute and integrate the cultures and races of the world into one homogenizing…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-15 02:46:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746725611601605048

    Reply addressees: @dr_duchesne

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746532041011654838