Form: Question

  • A Possibility of Democratic Process?

    Oct 17, 2019, 5:21 PM

    QUESTION: —“Curt I have a question for you. Do you think that there is any possibility of a tyrant getting in charge of the USA should it descend into civil war for separation? Or do we think this can be done by democratic processes in place? The latter one I think realistically doesn’t have a chance.”—

    There is a possibility of democratic process IF we propose a solution that is a superior alternative to certain conflict. This is what I hope to do. But the public won’t accept that until the conflict is certain. Which will happen soon. Any democrat is by definition a tyrant, because any rule by legislation rather than rule by law of reciprocity is by definition despotism. My hope, and most probable is a military takeover of the government. The problem is that the military needs something to enforce. So we must provide them with the market demand (up rising), moral license (to prevent chaos and civil war), and solution (that they can enforce to maintain the peace). We will need to act before the election. That’s all I can tell you. And that is why I’m working so hard to get enough done to provide that solution – at the last minute. Edit

  • Red Queen?

    Red Queen? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/red-queen/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:21:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265664354814504962

  • Red Queen?

    Oct 30, 2019, 3:53 PM

    —“I’m still not exactly sure what do you mean by defeating the red queen because to me, red queen is part of the natural law (or rather one of its causes) and defeating nature is something leftists think they can do.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm. i mean staying ahead of the red queen?

    —“So, staying ahead of whoever happens to be in competition with you at the moment.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm broader. This planet is really dangerous and we are in a very ‘quiet’ period. This solar system is pretty dangerous and we are in a quiet period. This galaxy is in a pretty dangerous, and we are in a quiet period. I mean, until we are able to run around the universe we are kinda in competition with the red queen. After that WE ARE THE RED QUEEN.

    —“Okay, now I see. “You have to keep moving to stay in the same place.” I don’t think we can ever afford to stop moving so to me, ever defeating it remains out of the question. Staying ahead is right.”—Martin Štěpán

  • What Does “Bait Into Hazard” Mean?

    What Does “Bait Into Hazard” Mean? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/what-does-bait-into-hazard-mean-2/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 05:28:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265515118210822144

  • Question: Why Is Interruption Advertising Legal?

    Question: Why Is Interruption Advertising Legal? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/question-why-is-interruption-advertising-legal/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:36:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265502151800954889

  • Question: Why Is Interruption Advertising Legal?

    Dec 1, 2019, 9:17 AM What would happen if we prohibited interruption advertising. in other words, the only advertising possible would be destination. Wouldn’t every company create its own internet channel? Wouldn’t a much smaller number of media companies sell content people wanted rather than advertisers wanted? Why wouldn’t that be better than today?

  • Question: Why Is Interruption Advertising Legal?

    Dec 1, 2019, 9:17 AM What would happen if we prohibited interruption advertising. in other words, the only advertising possible would be destination. Wouldn’t every company create its own internet channel? Wouldn’t a much smaller number of media companies sell content people wanted rather than advertisers wanted? Why wouldn’t that be better than today?

  • Does William James Belong to The “anglo Science” Team?

    Does William James Belong to The “anglo Science” Team? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/does-william-james-belong-to-the-anglo-science-team/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:32:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265501014066634755

  • What Do You Think Is the Most Capitalist Society

    What Do You Think Is the Most Capitalist Society https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/what-do-you-think-is-the-most-capitalist-society/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 03:49:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265490357623627780

  • What About Hiding Advocacy of Ir-Reciprocity and Falsehood in Entertainment?

    Jan 3, 2020, 12:41 PM

    —“How would a society with functioning P-Constitution deal with literature that contains a lot of BS, and claiming it’s just fiction, poetry as an argument to justify the untruths presented and argued in that publication?”—Lauritz Burgunderholm

    We prosecute advocacy of criminality today. We have prosecuted it in the past. We had no means of DEMARCATION in the past. Because of P, we have that means of demarcation now, so there is no problem criminalizing advocacy of falsehood and ir-reciprocity no matter the ‘Grammar’ it is written in. The Law doesn’t say what TO do, and what NOT to do is just what is false or ir-reciprocal. You could write Animal Farm. You couldn’t write the communist manifesto, or pretty much anything postmodern in form.

    —“Thank you.”–Lauritz Burgunderholm