Q: —“Is there even one major globally influential power economy that isn’t dominated by nutjobs whether Christian, Zionist, Jewish, Muslim, Communist or anti-scientific (the ideology of racial, gender, religious or class equality)?” — RelateToReality https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1290772331057610754
Source date (UTC): 2020-08-04 22:22:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1290775210757586945
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1290772331057610754
Q: —“Is there even one major globally influential power economy that isn’t dominated by nutjobs whether Christian, Zionist, Jewish, Muslim, Communist or anti-scientific (the ideology of racial, gender, religious or class equality)?” — RelateToReality https://t.co/AcDUNpDqW2
Accusations of Narcissism? Self Defense. https://t.co/nqRqPAnXPQ
[T]he Complete Answer – in Proper Propertarian Fashion It’s hard to know what you’re asking given the sentence structure of the question. If you mean ideals as in aspirations, or metaphors, or if you mean ‘truths’ – most people who ask this category of question are trying to preserve some form of malinvestment in their education, or some form of lying to themselves, or some form of lying to others, or some form of social construction of lying along with others. I don’t know why your asking. I’ll assume for purely intellectual reasons. So we only “reject” in so far as people use them to state falsehoods, lie, and defraud. P is as language, logic, and science of testimony in court, for the purpose of detecting, prosecuting, demanding restitution and punishment for failure of due diligence against falsehoods, deceits, and frauds. P is law a formal logic, meaning science of Law. It is not philosophy. it is not ideology. I (we) then use this logic to understand and explain the world, to make arguments and resolve disputes, and to construct laws, constitutions, governments, and policies within those governments. I (we) demonstrate a bias to maximize the suppression of falsehood and irreciprocity in a polity by recommending a political system that applies this law. Whether this constitutes and application of human science (truth), a philosophy (choice), or a preference (choice), is something else. As far as I know I just state what truthful government would be and let people choose from there what to do about it. What Is P? P is a formal operational logic, like software programming. Not a set logic (language). A system of measurement by which we can compare almost anything across any discipline. And we‘re comparing it to what’s testifiable. We can develop the logic of operations (actions,), measurements (mathematics), of scriptural interpretation or textual interpretation, or numerology (reading INTO something), or we can resort to emotional free association (tea leaves, divination, entrails, astrology). P provides a complete system of decidability in matters of dispute across all disciplines. It tells us what is un-testifiable, false, deceitful, and fraudulent. Under decidability (not choice, not preference, but decidability), anything that is not false, or irreciprocal, is either amoral or moral, useful or not useful. Under P-epistemology (cognitive science), all contents of the brain are produced by sensation, perception, integration, auto-association, and recursive auto-association, in a continuous search for utility – usually a caloric discount. The means by which one performs free association, whether under realism, naturalism, operationalism (demonstrated), verbal analogy and idealism, or imaginary occult and supernatural has no bearing on anything. Instead, we perform due diligence by a sequence of rational or logical testing, empirical testing, and market testing. And P provides a checklist of testifiability for those tests. And either a Promise, Claim, Statement, or Theory is testifiable and therefor ethical (non-criminal) to use in communication, education, persuasion, and argument, or it isn’t. There are three reasons I invented P, all of which I consider accomplished: (a) so that Europeans could describe their history, group strategy, traditions, norms, and values in rational and scientific terms. (b) So that political discourse could be conducted rationally instead of dishonestly. (c) And later on, so that we could end the industrialization of lying made possible in the twentieth century by the second Abrahamic wave of deception (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism), by extending our law on fraud to false promises that bait us into hazard, which is the Abrahamic method of deceit. So to answer your question, **we all find ‘wisdom’ in narratives **whether scientific (descriptive), historical(analogical), fictional(archetypal), magical and pseudoscientific (pseudoscience and pseudomathmatics), sophistry and idealism (philosophy), or supernatural and occult (theology). The question is only whether you’re deceiving or defrauding yourself or others by claiming any of these things are true and testifiable, whether outright or used in premises for further deduction, rather than vague analogies from which we can get ideas to benefit from (or denial to sedate or escape from reality.) And most of the time appeals to the untestifiable are attempts to preserve some form of malinvestment in their education, or some form of lying to themselves, or some form of lying to others, or some form of social construction of lying along with others. And since we test for incentives to engage in falsehood, deception, and fraud, we are only seeking whether you are engaging in deception or fraud or in analogy and ideation. Most people are. The degree to which most people lie constantly is exasperating once you know the P-Method. How Does This Method Work? 1) Propertarianism is a via-negativa methodology for detecting falsehood, ignorance, bias, deceit, and irreciprocity. Where philosophy tends toward justificationism, or a test of falsificationism, Propertarianism is adversarial: the competition between construction and application of a claim (theory, promise). (Methodological Adversarialism is the First Innovation in P.) 2) Propertarianism consists of the completion of the scientific method, by producing the criteria for testimony. We tend to think of the scientific method as something you do while investigating, but that’s false – and that’s the result of the failure to discover a via-Positiva scientific method. Instead, the scientific method consists of criteria we must meet in order to TESTIFY to speaking Truthfully: meaning free of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism(the spectrums of physical: magic to pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry to idealism, or imaginary: supernatural to occult), or outright fiction (deceits), by limiting ourselves to testifying to what is testifiable: realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, ensuring we’ve defined limits (no overgeneralization), fully accounted within them (no cherry-picking), and where we warrant (subject ourselves to the crime of perjury) if we don’t perform these due diligences. In other words, we illustrate that science evolved in European civilization as it did, and nowhere else, as an extension of our ancient, traditional, European common law of tort. (Formal Logic of Reciprocity in display, word (Testimony), and deed (action) is the second Innovation in P) 3) This methodology includes the technique of precise definitions limited to realism(materialism), naturalism(first cause of entropy), operationalism(actions), internal consistency, external correspondence, rational choice, and reciprocity et al. This technique is called “Disambiguation by Serialization, Operationalization”. Meaning we collect all terms that describe a spectrum of constant relations (say the color spectrum of red> orange > yellow > green > blue > indigo > violet is obvious, but say, morality: *immoral <unethical < amoral > ethical > moral *may not be. We then disambiguate each term and define it, modify its definition, or redefine it, so that the spectrum creates a subsystem of measurement of whatever constant relation. (Disambiguation by Serialization inherited from Computer Science is the third innovation in P) 4) Next, we use complete sentences, in the promissory form (“I promise that …”) in operational vocabulary, without the verb to-be (which is how most sophistry is created), that describe complete transactions – of changes in state, including externalities. So try to say anything without the verb to be and you will find most philosophical questions that appear difficult are just errors in grammar. This means we have produced what amounts to accounting entries, free of ‘assumptions’ by the audience or ‘suggestions’ by the speaker. (Transformation from performative and promissory truth to Formal Grammar of Testimonial Speech is the fourth innovation in P) 5) Next, we produce a ‘periodic table of the grammars’ which like the periodic table of the elements describes the evolution of all ‘logical paradigms’ from say, math, to sciences, to testimony, to ordinary language, to storytelling, to fictionalisms, to outright deceits. (The Grammars are the fifth innovation in P) 6) Together this methodology produces a universally commensurable, value-neutral, language of all disciplines. In other words, a system of measurement for speech. We call this P-Logic. (This is the result of the P-Project. A formal, value-neutral, logic, grammar, and vocabulary of truthful speech across all disciplines. A universal language of the sciences.) 7) We then write arguments in what looks very much like computer software. That’s because we have combined testimonial speech, operationalism (computation) transactions, the economics of human behavior, to write strictly constructed law – or what we would call a ‘Formal Operational Logic” of cognitive science, language, psychology, sociology, and group strategy. this provides us with the ‘missing’ formal logic of the human sciences and unifies the formal sciences (logics, grammars), physical sciences, and human sciences (psychology, sociology, group strategy, and ethics, law, economics, politics). Write the law in this form and we call this ‘P-Law’. (This is the second result of the P-project. The solution to strictly constructed law that is absent from modern law and constitutions, and why the law is no longer ‘respected’ as in the past as a logic rather than arbitrary judgments)
[T]he Complete Answer – in Proper Propertarian Fashion It’s hard to know what you’re asking given the sentence structure of the question. If you mean ideals as in aspirations, or metaphors, or if you mean ‘truths’ – most people who ask this category of question are trying to preserve some form of malinvestment in their education, or some form of lying to themselves, or some form of lying to others, or some form of social construction of lying along with others. I don’t know why your asking. I’ll assume for purely intellectual reasons. So we only “reject” in so far as people use them to state falsehoods, lie, and defraud. P is as language, logic, and science of testimony in court, for the purpose of detecting, prosecuting, demanding restitution and punishment for failure of due diligence against falsehoods, deceits, and frauds. P is law a formal logic, meaning science of Law. It is not philosophy. it is not ideology. I (we) then use this logic to understand and explain the world, to make arguments and resolve disputes, and to construct laws, constitutions, governments, and policies within those governments. I (we) demonstrate a bias to maximize the suppression of falsehood and irreciprocity in a polity by recommending a political system that applies this law. Whether this constitutes and application of human science (truth), a philosophy (choice), or a preference (choice), is something else. As far as I know I just state what truthful government would be and let people choose from there what to do about it. What Is P? P is a formal operational logic, like software programming. Not a set logic (language). A system of measurement by which we can compare almost anything across any discipline. And we‘re comparing it to what’s testifiable. We can develop the logic of operations (actions,), measurements (mathematics), of scriptural interpretation or textual interpretation, or numerology (reading INTO something), or we can resort to emotional free association (tea leaves, divination, entrails, astrology). P provides a complete system of decidability in matters of dispute across all disciplines. It tells us what is un-testifiable, false, deceitful, and fraudulent. Under decidability (not choice, not preference, but decidability), anything that is not false, or irreciprocal, is either amoral or moral, useful or not useful. Under P-epistemology (cognitive science), all contents of the brain are produced by sensation, perception, integration, auto-association, and recursive auto-association, in a continuous search for utility – usually a caloric discount. The means by which one performs free association, whether under realism, naturalism, operationalism (demonstrated), verbal analogy and idealism, or imaginary occult and supernatural has no bearing on anything. Instead, we perform due diligence by a sequence of rational or logical testing, empirical testing, and market testing. And P provides a checklist of testifiability for those tests. And either a Promise, Claim, Statement, or Theory is testifiable and therefor ethical (non-criminal) to use in communication, education, persuasion, and argument, or it isn’t. There are three reasons I invented P, all of which I consider accomplished: (a) so that Europeans could describe their history, group strategy, traditions, norms, and values in rational and scientific terms. (b) So that political discourse could be conducted rationally instead of dishonestly. (c) And later on, so that we could end the industrialization of lying made possible in the twentieth century by the second Abrahamic wave of deception (marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism), by extending our law on fraud to false promises that bait us into hazard, which is the Abrahamic method of deceit. So to answer your question, **we all find ‘wisdom’ in narratives **whether scientific (descriptive), historical(analogical), fictional(archetypal), magical and pseudoscientific (pseudoscience and pseudomathmatics), sophistry and idealism (philosophy), or supernatural and occult (theology). The question is only whether you’re deceiving or defrauding yourself or others by claiming any of these things are true and testifiable, whether outright or used in premises for further deduction, rather than vague analogies from which we can get ideas to benefit from (or denial to sedate or escape from reality.) And most of the time appeals to the untestifiable are attempts to preserve some form of malinvestment in their education, or some form of lying to themselves, or some form of lying to others, or some form of social construction of lying along with others. And since we test for incentives to engage in falsehood, deception, and fraud, we are only seeking whether you are engaging in deception or fraud or in analogy and ideation. Most people are. The degree to which most people lie constantly is exasperating once you know the P-Method. How Does This Method Work? 1) Propertarianism is a via-negativa methodology for detecting falsehood, ignorance, bias, deceit, and irreciprocity. Where philosophy tends toward justificationism, or a test of falsificationism, Propertarianism is adversarial: the competition between construction and application of a claim (theory, promise). (Methodological Adversarialism is the First Innovation in P.) 2) Propertarianism consists of the completion of the scientific method, by producing the criteria for testimony. We tend to think of the scientific method as something you do while investigating, but that’s false – and that’s the result of the failure to discover a via-Positiva scientific method. Instead, the scientific method consists of criteria we must meet in order to TESTIFY to speaking Truthfully: meaning free of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism(the spectrums of physical: magic to pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry to idealism, or imaginary: supernatural to occult), or outright fiction (deceits), by limiting ourselves to testifying to what is testifiable: realism, naturalism, operationalism, rational choice, reciprocity, ensuring we’ve defined limits (no overgeneralization), fully accounted within them (no cherry-picking), and where we warrant (subject ourselves to the crime of perjury) if we don’t perform these due diligences. In other words, we illustrate that science evolved in European civilization as it did, and nowhere else, as an extension of our ancient, traditional, European common law of tort. (Formal Logic of Reciprocity in display, word (Testimony), and deed (action) is the second Innovation in P) 3) This methodology includes the technique of precise definitions limited to realism(materialism), naturalism(first cause of entropy), operationalism(actions), internal consistency, external correspondence, rational choice, and reciprocity et al. This technique is called “Disambiguation by Serialization, Operationalization”. Meaning we collect all terms that describe a spectrum of constant relations (say the color spectrum of red> orange > yellow > green > blue > indigo > violet is obvious, but say, morality: *immoral <unethical < amoral > ethical > moral *may not be. We then disambiguate each term and define it, modify its definition, or redefine it, so that the spectrum creates a subsystem of measurement of whatever constant relation. (Disambiguation by Serialization inherited from Computer Science is the third innovation in P) 4) Next, we use complete sentences, in the promissory form (“I promise that …”) in operational vocabulary, without the verb to-be (which is how most sophistry is created), that describe complete transactions – of changes in state, including externalities. So try to say anything without the verb to be and you will find most philosophical questions that appear difficult are just errors in grammar. This means we have produced what amounts to accounting entries, free of ‘assumptions’ by the audience or ‘suggestions’ by the speaker. (Transformation from performative and promissory truth to Formal Grammar of Testimonial Speech is the fourth innovation in P) 5) Next, we produce a ‘periodic table of the grammars’ which like the periodic table of the elements describes the evolution of all ‘logical paradigms’ from say, math, to sciences, to testimony, to ordinary language, to storytelling, to fictionalisms, to outright deceits. (The Grammars are the fifth innovation in P) 6) Together this methodology produces a universally commensurable, value-neutral, language of all disciplines. In other words, a system of measurement for speech. We call this P-Logic. (This is the result of the P-Project. A formal, value-neutral, logic, grammar, and vocabulary of truthful speech across all disciplines. A universal language of the sciences.) 7) We then write arguments in what looks very much like computer software. That’s because we have combined testimonial speech, operationalism (computation) transactions, the economics of human behavior, to write strictly constructed law – or what we would call a ‘Formal Operational Logic” of cognitive science, language, psychology, sociology, and group strategy. this provides us with the ‘missing’ formal logic of the human sciences and unifies the formal sciences (logics, grammars), physical sciences, and human sciences (psychology, sociology, group strategy, and ethics, law, economics, politics). Write the law in this form and we call this ‘P-Law’. (This is the second result of the P-project. The solution to strictly constructed law that is absent from modern law and constitutions, and why the law is no longer ‘respected’ as in the past as a logic rather than arbitrary judgments)
THE COMPLETE AND EXASPERATING ANSWER – A PAINFUL TRUTH YOU MAY NOT BE READY FOR Yes. And moreover, a theological (Abrahamic) religion is a barrier to success. And contrary to our intuition, the evidence that supernatural organized religion is the most destructive institution a people can bear. And that Abrahamic religion, in particular, is the most deadly and destructive force responsible for the most death, destruction, harm, and suffering outside of the great plagues and diseases. GREECE AND ROME Rome eventually developed a public religion of State, A cultural Religion of Paganism (Heroic Archetypes), Animistic Cults (Nature Worship or ‘Hethensm), and private religions of Aryanism (Supremacy), stocism(Self Discipline in Ordinary Life), epicureanism (Joy in Ordinary Life). The Roman weakness was it’s an emphasis on the military to secure trade, commerce, and tolerance. When had they thoroughly prosecuted Christians and Jews we might never have had the dark age that was Abrahamic religions. So was Rome atheist? No, but it followed the Indo European Traditions of (a) the primacy of man, not gods, (b) the primacy of (joy of) life, not ‘netherworlds’, (c) the primacy of prosperity by heroic expansionary, militaristic, materialistic, paternalistic, sky worshipping, technological, commercial. (d) Reality as tragic and the Conquest of the reality as a heroic achievement – not abandoning reality, or ignoring reality, nor tolerating reality, but conquering it. CHINA (EAST ASIA) China is already majority atheist, (and they ridicule westerners for our superstition). Confucianism and Daoism are “Wisdom Literature”, as were stoicism, epicureanism, and closest to Aristotelianism. The difference is western civilization is purely aristocratic, meaning purely military, grants self-determination to everyone (sovereignty) that serves, and produces individualism, as a consequence. China maintained a minority military aristocracy and the ritual was invented to control their outrageous hyperconsumption,. BUDDHISM Buddhism, or reformed Hinduism, only reluctantly devolved from a ‘pseudoscientific’ competitor to stoicism, into a religion. Unfortunately, the extreme pacifism was discovered by aristocracies, just as Christian pacifism and both were imposed in order to suppress male heroism to conquer the forces of nature and man, convert it to feminine heroism in submission to external forces of heroism and man. Both Christian and Buddhism claims of heroism and martial virtues are circumstantial, and antithetical, not intrinsic. HINDUISM Hinduism isn’t a religion so much as mythological wisdom literature. It’s mythology closest to Confucianism is a rational ‘wisdom literature of harmony and reasonableness’. And India did – although lost it – have a period of political philosophy as sophisticated as the greeks and only lacked the martial discipline of the Romans, so they failed to maintain it. Hinduism fills the borderline between religion and wisdom literature. THE SUPERNATURAL RELIGIONS OF THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD CHRISTIANS, Europe didn’t recover from the invasion of Jewish-Christianity until the restoration of Aristotle in 1200. And we are still trying to escape the curse of Christianity, restore nature, ancestor and hero worship (debt), restore truthful empirical speech to levels found in greek and roman thought. *(My specialty is existential truth, the formal logic of the human sciences, and the formal logic of law – mostly for the purpose of suppressing fraud in political speech. The greatest resistance comes from Christians. They behave like addicts. ) MUSLIMS Islam managed to destroy every single great civilization of the ancient world, all their institutions, all their learning, all their arts, all their religion, their philosophy and reduced them to mandatory ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia from high rates of reproduction at the bottom, inbreeding and slave-cross breeding and no means of natural selection like far east and northwest. Every great civilization: Rome, Byzantium, North Africa, Egypt, Persia, The Levant, Mesopotamia, NW India, were defeated by raiding commercial transactions (sieges), converted by the threat of 30% increase in taxes for not doing so, the civilizational capital rapidly consumed and exhausted; Persia tried temporarily to collect the information of the known world just as Spain raided the gold of the New world, Napoleon raided the arts of Europe, and Britain raided the monuments of the ancient world, but in the end, as soon as the capital was exhausted, the natural consequence of Islam was the gravity of fundamentalism, and the continuous expansion of ignorance, superstition, and decline, until the Turks, destroyed the Persian hopes of restoration, finally destroyed Byzantium, and as a consequence caused Europeans to develop the Age of Sail to Bypass the Turks. In doing so the entire economy of the middle east, as the market at the nexus of four continents, was eliminated and the ability for the aristocracy to fund militaries and profit from taxing trade was irradicated, and the superstition, ignorance, tribalism, and dysgenia of the Islamic states that had made them unproductive, but so easy to rule, was exposed. Without being gatekeepers to trade, without any civilization left to exploit. Without the ability and trust to form institutions. Without the genetics to educate into an industrial workforce. The middle east fell to Subsaharan African levels, other than for the oil that buoyed them to the present. JEWS, Jews were the most literate subgroup in Europe, just as Gypsies mastered specialization in prostitution and petty crime, Jews would not demonstrate loyalty to the Empire so were conquered, and male Jews fled into the diaspora (cities of the various empires) and started out as money changers and sellers of expensive wares to elites, married local woman (mostly italian) then migrated into the mastery in organized crime, and specialized in ‘baiting into hazard’: usury (300% credit), and seducing people into debt then forcibly taking their property and reselling it for profit, they industrialized immorality on credit, including prostitution, spreading alcoholism by selling it on credit (today’s drug dealers), and corruption, working with the government to collect taxes (corruption), and turn the profits into rent-seeking(extractive industries), slaving, all profitable if semi-criminal industries, for which they were consistently cast out of over a hundred countries. Yet they contributed absolutely nothing to human knowledge until they were offered enfranchisement in exchange for abandoning their superstition and adopting western scientific enlightenment (Aristotelianism). THE NEW PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC RELIGIONS There is no difference between: (a) the Abrahamic Religion’s war by Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to conquer, consume, and destroy – against the European discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical laws of the universe, natural laws of cooperation and evolutionary laws of the incremental domestication of animal man – by the Abrahamic false promise of life after death, the denial of reason and agency, the denial of reality, the primacy of the afterlife, the primacy of gods over man, in exchange for undermining the aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world.
(b) the Abrahamic pseudoscientific religions of Marxism to undermine markets between the classes, and the natural eugenics that results; Neo-Marxism to undermine the cultural norms traditions values aesthetics and institutions that allow us to prosper together despite the tragedy of the physical nature and evolutionary laws; Both Ancient Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Modern Judaism, Marxism, Neo-Marxism and Postmodernism, and Islamism, which exist for no other reason than to cast Indo-European civilizations as oppressors rather than the discoverers of, adaptors to, and appliers of, the physical, natural and evolutionary laws – and to foment resentment by those who cannot compete under those laws, against Indo-European peoples as a proxy for their resentment of and hatred of God or gods, for creating those laws of our universe, which Europeans discovered, adapted to and applied. They sell you the lie that you can defeat the laws of the universe by creating an illusion in your mind, by social construction of reality, through repetition of falsehoods, and the profit from that deception. They profit from the incremental destruction of mankind, the reversal of evolution, and the running-down of the hourglass of time. They teach the great lie that there is freedom from those laws if they gain freedom from the government of the Indo-European people. When in fact, they are the genetic, cultural, and informational cancer that seeks to reverse evolution and doom mankind to failure to pass thru the great filter, in this brief 12,000 years of geological, solar, and galactic peace. ONE TRUE RELIGION There is only one healthy political religion, that is ‘true’.
Because under the European (and Japanese) military tradition, every man has a duty and is due respect regardless of rank for having done it. Every man is sovereign in his property for having done it. Every man develops mindfulness for having done it. Every man overcomes his limits for having done it. And every man intuits rightly that he ‘owns’ a share of his civilization for having done it – and is in debt to no one for it. Only then is he sovereign in mind, intuition, and body. This is the secret of western and Japanese high trust civilization. And it is the combination of piety in faith, piety in court, and piety in military service that made western man ‘unique’ and able to create large complex organizations ‘relatively’ or at least comparatively free of corruption. Only Japan and Western Europe were able to develop these traditions. And only Japan survived the spread of the addiction of the Abrahamic cults, retaining their Ancestor Worship, National Worship, Ritual Work, Martial Discipline, and relative empiricism. And the postwar attempt by the Jewish left, to bring marxism to the west, has worked every single day to undermine that high trust, that martial character, and all the goods that arrive from it – so that the jews can reduce to ashes from within as they did in Russia, and Germany, what the Muslims have reduced to ashes from without to the lost civilizations of the ancient world.
THE COMPLETE AND EXASPERATING ANSWER – A PAINFUL TRUTH YOU MAY NOT BE READY FOR Yes. And moreover, a theological (Abrahamic) religion is a barrier to success. And contrary to our intuition, the evidence that supernatural organized religion is the most destructive institution a people can bear. And that Abrahamic religion, in particular, is the most deadly and destructive force responsible for the most death, destruction, harm, and suffering outside of the great plagues and diseases. GREECE AND ROME Rome eventually developed a public religion of State, A cultural Religion of Paganism (Heroic Archetypes), Animistic Cults (Nature Worship or ‘Hethensm), and private religions of Aryanism (Supremacy), stocism(Self Discipline in Ordinary Life), epicureanism (Joy in Ordinary Life). The Roman weakness was it’s an emphasis on the military to secure trade, commerce, and tolerance. When had they thoroughly prosecuted Christians and Jews we might never have had the dark age that was Abrahamic religions. So was Rome atheist? No, but it followed the Indo European Traditions of (a) the primacy of man, not gods, (b) the primacy of (joy of) life, not ‘netherworlds’, (c) the primacy of prosperity by heroic expansionary, militaristic, materialistic, paternalistic, sky worshipping, technological, commercial. (d) Reality as tragic and the Conquest of the reality as a heroic achievement – not abandoning reality, or ignoring reality, nor tolerating reality, but conquering it. CHINA (EAST ASIA) China is already majority atheist, (and they ridicule westerners for our superstition). Confucianism and Daoism are “Wisdom Literature”, as were stoicism, epicureanism, and closest to Aristotelianism. The difference is western civilization is purely aristocratic, meaning purely military, grants self-determination to everyone (sovereignty) that serves, and produces individualism, as a consequence. China maintained a minority military aristocracy and the ritual was invented to control their outrageous hyperconsumption,. BUDDHISM Buddhism, or reformed Hinduism, only reluctantly devolved from a ‘pseudoscientific’ competitor to stoicism, into a religion. Unfortunately, the extreme pacifism was discovered by aristocracies, just as Christian pacifism and both were imposed in order to suppress male heroism to conquer the forces of nature and man, convert it to feminine heroism in submission to external forces of heroism and man. Both Christian and Buddhism claims of heroism and martial virtues are circumstantial, and antithetical, not intrinsic. HINDUISM Hinduism isn’t a religion so much as mythological wisdom literature. It’s mythology closest to Confucianism is a rational ‘wisdom literature of harmony and reasonableness’. And India did – although lost it – have a period of political philosophy as sophisticated as the greeks and only lacked the martial discipline of the Romans, so they failed to maintain it. Hinduism fills the borderline between religion and wisdom literature. THE SUPERNATURAL RELIGIONS OF THE ABRAHAMIC METHOD CHRISTIANS, Europe didn’t recover from the invasion of Jewish-Christianity until the restoration of Aristotle in 1200. And we are still trying to escape the curse of Christianity, restore nature, ancestor and hero worship (debt), restore truthful empirical speech to levels found in greek and roman thought. *(My specialty is existential truth, the formal logic of the human sciences, and the formal logic of law – mostly for the purpose of suppressing fraud in political speech. The greatest resistance comes from Christians. They behave like addicts. ) MUSLIMS Islam managed to destroy every single great civilization of the ancient world, all their institutions, all their learning, all their arts, all their religion, their philosophy and reduced them to mandatory ignorance, superstition, and dysgenia from high rates of reproduction at the bottom, inbreeding and slave-cross breeding and no means of natural selection like far east and northwest. Every great civilization: Rome, Byzantium, North Africa, Egypt, Persia, The Levant, Mesopotamia, NW India, were defeated by raiding commercial transactions (sieges), converted by the threat of 30% increase in taxes for not doing so, the civilizational capital rapidly consumed and exhausted; Persia tried temporarily to collect the information of the known world just as Spain raided the gold of the New world, Napoleon raided the arts of Europe, and Britain raided the monuments of the ancient world, but in the end, as soon as the capital was exhausted, the natural consequence of Islam was the gravity of fundamentalism, and the continuous expansion of ignorance, superstition, and decline, until the Turks, destroyed the Persian hopes of restoration, finally destroyed Byzantium, and as a consequence caused Europeans to develop the Age of Sail to Bypass the Turks. In doing so the entire economy of the middle east, as the market at the nexus of four continents, was eliminated and the ability for the aristocracy to fund militaries and profit from taxing trade was irradicated, and the superstition, ignorance, tribalism, and dysgenia of the Islamic states that had made them unproductive, but so easy to rule, was exposed. Without being gatekeepers to trade, without any civilization left to exploit. Without the ability and trust to form institutions. Without the genetics to educate into an industrial workforce. The middle east fell to Subsaharan African levels, other than for the oil that buoyed them to the present. JEWS, Jews were the most literate subgroup in Europe, just as Gypsies mastered specialization in prostitution and petty crime, Jews would not demonstrate loyalty to the Empire so were conquered, and male Jews fled into the diaspora (cities of the various empires) and started out as money changers and sellers of expensive wares to elites, married local woman (mostly italian) then migrated into the mastery in organized crime, and specialized in ‘baiting into hazard’: usury (300% credit), and seducing people into debt then forcibly taking their property and reselling it for profit, they industrialized immorality on credit, including prostitution, spreading alcoholism by selling it on credit (today’s drug dealers), and corruption, working with the government to collect taxes (corruption), and turn the profits into rent-seeking(extractive industries), slaving, all profitable if semi-criminal industries, for which they were consistently cast out of over a hundred countries. Yet they contributed absolutely nothing to human knowledge until they were offered enfranchisement in exchange for abandoning their superstition and adopting western scientific enlightenment (Aristotelianism). THE NEW PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC RELIGIONS There is no difference between: (a) the Abrahamic Religion’s war by Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to conquer, consume, and destroy – against the European discovery, adaptation to, and application of the physical laws of the universe, natural laws of cooperation and evolutionary laws of the incremental domestication of animal man – by the Abrahamic false promise of life after death, the denial of reason and agency, the denial of reality, the primacy of the afterlife, the primacy of gods over man, in exchange for undermining the aristocratic civilizations of the ancient world.
(b) the Abrahamic pseudoscientific religions of Marxism to undermine markets between the classes, and the natural eugenics that results; Neo-Marxism to undermine the cultural norms traditions values aesthetics and institutions that allow us to prosper together despite the tragedy of the physical nature and evolutionary laws; Both Ancient Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Modern Judaism, Marxism, Neo-Marxism and Postmodernism, and Islamism, which exist for no other reason than to cast Indo-European civilizations as oppressors rather than the discoverers of, adaptors to, and appliers of, the physical, natural and evolutionary laws – and to foment resentment by those who cannot compete under those laws, against Indo-European peoples as a proxy for their resentment of and hatred of God or gods, for creating those laws of our universe, which Europeans discovered, adapted to and applied. They sell you the lie that you can defeat the laws of the universe by creating an illusion in your mind, by social construction of reality, through repetition of falsehoods, and the profit from that deception. They profit from the incremental destruction of mankind, the reversal of evolution, and the running-down of the hourglass of time. They teach the great lie that there is freedom from those laws if they gain freedom from the government of the Indo-European people. When in fact, they are the genetic, cultural, and informational cancer that seeks to reverse evolution and doom mankind to failure to pass thru the great filter, in this brief 12,000 years of geological, solar, and galactic peace. ONE TRUE RELIGION There is only one healthy political religion, that is ‘true’.
Because under the European (and Japanese) military tradition, every man has a duty and is due respect regardless of rank for having done it. Every man is sovereign in his property for having done it. Every man develops mindfulness for having done it. Every man overcomes his limits for having done it. And every man intuits rightly that he ‘owns’ a share of his civilization for having done it – and is in debt to no one for it. Only then is he sovereign in mind, intuition, and body. This is the secret of western and Japanese high trust civilization. And it is the combination of piety in faith, piety in court, and piety in military service that made western man ‘unique’ and able to create large complex organizations ‘relatively’ or at least comparatively free of corruption. Only Japan and Western Europe were able to develop these traditions. And only Japan survived the spread of the addiction of the Abrahamic cults, retaining their Ancestor Worship, National Worship, Ritual Work, Martial Discipline, and relative empiricism. And the postwar attempt by the Jewish left, to bring marxism to the west, has worked every single day to undermine that high trust, that martial character, and all the goods that arrive from it – so that the jews can reduce to ashes from within as they did in Russia, and Germany, what the Muslims have reduced to ashes from without to the lost civilizations of the ancient world.
Has anyone at all – anyone who wasn’t there – commented on the content of the speech, which was the reason we were there? None. Not a single one. This is what the right is reduced to – kids who watch cartoons.
How does the left win? By baiting the right into stupidity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-31 17:12:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289247451019448324
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1289240042494361602
Has anyone at all – anyone who wasn’t there – commented on the content of the speech, which was the reason we were there? None. Not a single one. This is what the right is reduced to – kids who watch cartoons.
How does the left win? By baiting the right into stupidity.
Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @realgalaxyjesus @JohnnyR84030075 @ramzpaul
Read page 25+ in The Great Transformation. The relationship between aristocracy and peasantry, and the despotism in china goes back forever.
Conversely, why was that relationship different in europe?
Militia.
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Transformation-Beginning-Religious-Traditions/dp/0375413170/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 17:20:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288887156392501251
Reply addressees: @bishkebab3 @Coronakrise5
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288876110189477888