Form: Project Update

  • (NLI, IRONY) Ok. Brad and I have just finished two chapters on ‘stupidity’ – whi

    (NLI, IRONY)
    Ok. Brad and I have just finished two chapters on ‘stupidity’ – which, is the falsificationary equivalent of studying IQ. And in doing so we have explained the hierarchy of malincentives across the structure of the population and the resulting affect on humility, morality, and competency.

    I wasn’t even sure we should include this topic in the volume at all, but it turns out it’s one of the most important in the work. (Certainly the most … painful)

    This is one of those ‘Never count your chickens’ bits of wisdom. Instead, just follow the logic of causal disambiguation until it’s exhausted by reduction to first principles. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2025-06-08 17:53:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1931771601965748499

  • Output of the Runcible staff meeting today was interesting.: –“It’s the long ch

    Output of the Runcible staff meeting today was interesting.:

    –“It’s the long chains of reasoning that make our work challenging, despite the it’s underlying simplicity.”— Eric Adams and Brandon Hayes.

    Eric’s work should result in the capacity to produce a measurement of human capacity for association and induction. This is one of those ‘must have’ measures that we haven’t been able to produce so far in cognitive science.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-06-04 17:16:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1930312761470529994

  • (NLI – Book Thoughts Part II) It appears that my partner in intellectual madness

    (NLI – Book Thoughts Part II)

    It appears that my partner in intellectual madness, His Highness Lord Doctor Bradley Werrell has won the argument as to whether we need the equivalent of a ‘dummies guide’ for each of the volumes given their overwhelming density. I agree and I assume that’s all that most people will read. Only right and proper intellectual nerdmasters (meaning philosophers and social scientists) will endure the crushing burden of the full force of the text. πŸ˜‰ (ok, I’m overdoing it for dramatic effect, but you get the idea: “Cliff Notes”. πŸ˜‰ ).

    For my part, I am happy as long as the team writes them and I just have to review them. I’ve got enough to do. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-31 01:36:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1928626541103296939

  • (NLI – Book Thoughts Part 1) Brad and I had decided to focus on the first four v

    (NLI – Book Thoughts Part 1)
    Brad and I had decided to focus on the first four volumes
    1. Crisis, 2. Measurement, 3. Logic, 4. Law
    But the fourth book in the series was originally:
    4. Science
    Followed by Law.
    The rest of the volumes:
    6. Prosecution, 7. Reformation, 8. History, 9. Religion

    However, as the books progress, I feel the Science is necessary if only because most of the behavioral science is in there and only briefly covered in the logic,

    My thoughts are changing partly due to the velocity with which we can work now that we can feed the drafts of the first four volumes AND so much of the past research work into GPT, which speeds the work so much by the simple virtue of producing the equivalent of a search engine capable of synthesizing topical requests from all those tomes rather than spending hours or days just collecting notes from our prior works.

    Our work consists largely of outlining a book, outlining each chapter, sketching each chapter, then creating a prompt for each section (few paragraphs) interrogating our vast body of work with an AI, composing the section, revising it a bit, and then passing through a set of reviews where we check for what’s missing what’s insufficiently covered and where we need transitions and summaries to assist the reader.

    The gradual refinement as we work through the drafts really has made a profound difference.

    Plus Brad gets to shine with his witticisms. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-31 01:31:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1928625276008935484

  • “CurtGPT” is by and large better than ChatGPT. It’s running off the first four v

    “CurtGPT” is by and large better than ChatGPT. It’s running off the first four volumes of our work in their current state of development. It’s not trained yet. So it’s imperfect at second order and third order derivations. But training will fix that.

    How to Access CurtGPT (Curt Doolittle’s Natural Law GPT):
    https://
    chatgpt.com/g/g-682681bf9f
    54819180437bac589ed838-curt-doolittle-s-natural-law
    …

    Though Ariella found an interesting hallucination today:
    The origin of the germanic to english name “Kurt > Curt”. They are short for germanic to english name “Konrad > Contrad”.

    Funny thing is the CurtGPT defines it also as a shorthand for the natural law framework. ;).

    Which is a hallucination but a cute one. lol

    -Cheers

    Sidebar Nonsense: My given name is Burton (In anglo saxon, it means Bur (Walled) Ton (Town) or fortified town. I was given ‘Curt’ as a nickname. I formally changed my name to Curt a few years ago. Originally, according to my mother, I was named Curt purely by similarity of sound, since I’m the fourth Burton > Burton (Burt) > Burton (“Bep”) > Burton (“Curt”). And we were all living at the same time in the same proximity when I was young.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-30 19:05:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1928528289175580991

  • It’s available if you have the link. Yes I am testing a retrieval based version

    It’s available if you have the link. Yes I am testing a retrieval based version so I can compare it to the trained version we are working on. πŸ˜‰

    Link is earlier in my feed.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-16 22:38:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1923508475667284226

  • (I Iive to serve. πŸ˜‰ But more directly, I’m using this series as drafts for the

    (I Iive to serve. πŸ˜‰ But more directly, I’m using this series as drafts for the chapter on the evolution of the west, and why we’re in the current predicament. I’m trying to write the piece that ties it all together by my stomach isn’t cooperating. lol. )


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-14 22:43:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1922784801607561572

  • We have many opportunities but we are sort of in heads-down mode until the books

    We have many opportunities but we are sort of in heads-down mode until the books are done.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-10 22:35:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921333333746684021

    Reply addressees: @slenchy @patriciamdavis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921331223072243970


    IN REPLY TO:

    @slenchy

    @curtdoolittle @patriciamdavis Anything planned in Europe?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1921331223072243970

  • (NLI) Update: Volume 1- The Crisis of the Age – Finished chapters 11, 12, 13, 14

    (NLI)
    Update: Volume 1- The Crisis of the Age – Finished chapters 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Second draft quality. Will need minor review.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 21:46:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920596271578165632

  • OUR PROGRESS WITH ALIGNING AI WITH TRUTH AND RECIPROCITY (MORALITY) So at NLI an

    OUR PROGRESS WITH ALIGNING AI WITH TRUTH AND RECIPROCITY (MORALITY)
    So at NLI and Runcible we are both creating a formal logic decomposer and compiler AND training an AI to make use of our logical system.
    But strangely enough, If I gave you my system prompt, my user prompt, and the ten or so documents in my Chatgpt Project (“My Work”) you would find that it would produce the correct answer to nearly every question.
    So without training, with just in-memory reasoning, ChatGPT can apply my work (our work) extensively
    So it’s not that we have doubts that we have solved the problem of AI decidability. It’s that we want to ensure that it can produce the level of precision that we as humans do with edge cases.
    So it’s not a question of success.
    It’s just a matter of precision.
    And that’s what we’re doing.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 01:46:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920294141826854912