Form: Project Update

  • We call it the Pamphlet but it’s just a short book. That will be published first

    We call it the Pamphlet but it’s just a short book. That will be published first. (sooner rather than later). Then the law, then probably the science then the philosophy. After the remaining volumes will come out as feel most ready to publish them. My health is the limiting factor here. As long as I have the help of the team and my health we’ll make progress.

    Teaching Aids
    The Pamphlet (Summary)
    The Courseware (Foundations) (Hard work)

    Volumes:
    The History
    The Philosophy
    The Science
    The Law
    The Reformation (of disciplines)
    The Prosecution

    — then —
    The Law of Europeans
    The Myths and Religion

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @Turbo_Flux


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-29 20:54:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685393261886578690

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685390903915970560

  • The team and I finished the Natural Law listing the methods of sedition and trea

    The team and I finished the Natural Law listing the methods of sedition and treason. And there are a terrifying scope of crimes of sedition and treason.

    NOTE: Listing means of Sedition and Treason illustrate the recipe for being a leftist.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 17:37:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682444670880698375

  • The team and I finished the Natural Law listing the methods of sedition and trea

    The team and I finished the Natural Law listing the methods of sedition and treason. And there are a terrifying scope of crimes of sedition and treason.

    NOTE: Listing means of Sedition and Treason illustrate the recipe for being a leftist.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 17:37:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682444670939299840

  • Believe it or not the staff is working on exactly that as the “Glossary Project”

    Believe it or not the staff is working on exactly that as the “Glossary Project”. Moritz has been complaining about this for years. Ian has wanted to take it on. But I finally feel confident the staff is capable of doing a good job. Our original thoughts were that we would keep it in a wiki for people to contribute to. But now it’s looking like we’ll just use one of the AI’s that can read it web pages, and maintain the web search.

    Reply addressees: @agent8698


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 20:08:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679583560733163520

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679562862870827009

  • Correct. We are reconstructing the home page and home page menus in particular.

    Correct. We are reconstructing the home page and home page menus in particular. We also work ‘live’ and publish as we go along, so that followers can access the work in the current state. This is much better than waiting until the vast project is complete before publishingโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-11 14:36:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678775243723407362

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII @FarajRashi93307

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678772249393004544

  • NLI UPDATE: PROGRESS ON THE WORK We work seven days a week, as a group for two t

    NLI UPDATE: PROGRESS ON THE WORK

    We work seven days a week, as a group for two to four hours. And we work on three threads 1) staff meeting, strategy, and event planning 2) First principles (Rules of evolutionary computation), and 3) Strict Construction of Rights, Obligations, and Inalienations (ROIs) – which is the ‘hard part’ of the content.

    We are working on an event with speakers – them is the secession vs reform possibilities. The team prefers sooner rather than later, but I’ve done these things before and it’s hard in short time frames. But we’ll remain cautiously optimistic.

    We will finish that draft of ROIs in the next few week days. We work on first principles on the weekend. And we should complete those in two or three weeks. Though, we have one outstanding issue that I need to discuss with a mathematical physicist to be comfortable that I haven’t overlooked anything.

    After, we’ll work on enumerating ROIs (bill of rights so to speak). And then we’ll move our work from the ‘working area’ that we’re using now, and integrate it into the constitution – revising the existing constitution with much more detail. (That’s our workflow.) Then we can link the home page to the major reforms page, and the major reforms sections to the appropriate constitution articles.

    So to get to the heart of our proposals, the user experience should be home page(easily accessible) -> major reforms (accessible) -> Constitutional detail (less accessible legalese.)

    We have so much work to do. And if we think about it, it’s overwhelming (and sometimes depressing). But keep making progress and and I think the timing is going to work out just fine. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-08 01:00:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677482803825463297

  • We need 70-100 people for a venue to be worth the effort of a presentation. We h

    We need 70-100 people for a venue to be worth the effort of a presentation. We have succeeded in NY and in Virginia. But that was before covid/blm/antifa near destruction of our nation, and the subsequent suppression of dissident speech on social media.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-04 16:57:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676274057329664000

    Reply addressees: @Will_of_Europa @aldafa_ir

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1676265200176046082

  • (NLI, Followers) Minor Tweak: Increase in Dominance of Responsibility in Behavio

    (NLI, Followers)
    Minor Tweak: Increase in Dominance of Responsibility in Behavioral Causality, expressed as sex differences in responsibility. ie: further reduction of sex differences in behavior to responsibility.

    So far this year, the work has led to increasingly deeper understanding of the sex differences in responsibility seeking or evading. And this in turn has led to the explanation of female behavior and the past century of decline institutionalized by the introgression of women into economy, education, and polity.

    In other words, all political differences are reducible to sex differences, and all sex differences are reducible to sex differences in pursuit or evasion of responsibility, and sex differences in pursuit and evasion of responsibility are due to sex differences in status seeking by female hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibility for capital to limit risk of conflict and benefit of dependency, vs male status seeking by accumulating responsibility for capital at the cost of risk of conflict and benefit opportunity, and these sex differences in status-seeking are reducible to sex difference in reproductive demands, and sex differences in responsibility for self and fragile offspring in time (prey) versus responsibility for resources: territory, resources, assets, men, women, and children over time.

    Entropy
    … Time
    … … Acquisition
    … … … Demonstrated Interests
    … … Cooperation
    … … … Reciprocity
    … … … … Truth
    … … … … … Productive
    … … … … … Fully Informed
    … … … … … Voluntary Transfer
    … … … … … … (of demonstrated interests)
    … … … … … Free of Imposition of costs
    … … … … … … (by externality on the interests of others)
    … … … … … In the limits of Warranty and Liability
    … … … … … … Responsibility (-)
    … … … … … … … Male Over Time and Space (Predator)
    … … … … … … … Female In Time and Space (Prey)
    … … 3 Means of Influence to Coercion
    … … … Force/Defense
    … … … Boycott/Remuneration
    … … … Undermining/Seduction
    … … Organizations (Scale)
    … … … Elites (Leadership)
    … … … … Institutions (persistence)
    … … … … … Sequence of Institutions (Dependency)
    … … Group Evolutionary Strategy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 05:18:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674286302471114752

  • There we go. World Model Done. Only four more properties to go. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Sensation (vi

    There we go. World Model Done. Only four more properties to go. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Sensation (vibration) >
    … Perception (organization) >
    … … Disambiguation (objects, spaces, places, locations, backgrounds) >
    … … … World model (integration) >
    … … … … Prediction(opportunities, competition)>
    … … … … … Moral tolerability (non-imposition of costs)>
    … … … … … … Operational possibility (change, logic)>
    … … … … … … … Recursion (comparison)>
    … … … … … … … … Attention (choice)>
    … … … … … … … … … Negotiation (Language)>
    (Continuous Recursive Loop)

    https://t.co/D4ItVt60Uc

    Reply addressees: @arankomatsuzaki


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 17:28:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672295543043702810

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672048278886658049

  • FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES (Added another video) A couple of years ago

    FOUNDATIONS OF CONSCIOUSNESS SERIES
    (Added another video)
    A couple of years ago I started producing a series of videos from the basic nervous system through to consciousness. I’d forgotten to publish this one on spaces and places (our sixth sense), and I’ve also recorded the Hippocampal region (where we create episodes and auto-associations, and predictions – where the magic happens).

    I’m not thrilled with the recording quality because I was in ‘constrained’ circumstances taking care of an elderly parent and recording in an auditorium. That said, I’ve written most of the content for everything through the circuits of the brain and yes, the experience of qualia and consciousness.

    My intention was to demystify (end the philosophical sophistry and pseudoscience) and explain with relative clarity how simple the brain, mind, and consciousness really is, despite its massive parallelism. And it really is quite simple. If it wasn’t, then flip-book animations wouldn’t work. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    These videos were the original first course of the Foundations (The Work). But we found we needed to start with a much simpler starting place. So we switched to the discussion of how to present the content, and eventually (almost two years ago) decided to use the first principles, despite my original desire to start with the brain, the logic, then grammars, then the first principles (scientific laws).

    There are content creators today who are doing similar work even if less coherent in explaining the functions of the brain as an ‘operating system we experience’.

    But this will get the point across for those who are interested.

    I will most likely have to re-record the whole series at some point and have someone increase the production quality – when I have the time, which I rarely have.

    For now we are working on the first book and the constitution. From there we will have the foundations to work on the rest of the books and the lessons. for them. But again, we are effectively trying to produce a four year program in multiple disciplines with a tiny team and it’s not easy. Ask anyone who has produced college courseware for stem.

    https://t.co/yC9VUXDIU7


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 00:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670951856032366597